Central Bank Digital Currencies: A Comprehensive Analysis of Design, Implications, and Global Developments

Abstract

Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) have emerged as a profound and potentially transformative force in the global financial landscape, compelling central banks worldwide to undertake extensive exploration and experimentation. This report provides an exhaustive and in-depth analysis of CBDCs, meticulously examining their various architectural types, critical design choices, far-reaching economic and social implications, and the current global status of research initiatives, pilot programs, and policy considerations. By synthesizing a broad spectrum of existing literature, authoritative central bank publications, and recent real-world developments, this report aims to offer a truly comprehensive and nuanced understanding of CBDCs and their inherent potential to fundamentally reshape and revolutionize existing financial systems, fostering greater efficiency, resilience, and inclusion.

Many thanks to our sponsor Panxora who helped us prepare this research report.

1. Introduction

1.1 The Digital Transformation of Money

The advent of pervasive digital technologies has irrevocably reshaped numerous facets of modern life, with its impact on the financial sector proving particularly profound and disruptive. This digital evolution has catalyzed an intensive global exploration into the concept and feasibility of Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs). These digital currencies, distinctively issued and regulated by a nation’s central bank, represent an innovative new form of money that exists exclusively in digital form. Unlike the myriad of privately issued cryptocurrencies, which are typically decentralized and often characterized by volatile price fluctuations, CBDCs are inherently centralized. Their fundamental aim is to meticulously combine the inherent benefits of digital payments—such as speed, efficiency, and reduced transaction costs—with the unparalleled stability, trust, and sovereign backing traditionally associated with conventional fiat currencies. This foundational report meticulously delves into the multifaceted aspects of CBDCs, encompassing their various classifications, the intricate design considerations that underpin their development, their potentially profound economic and social implications, and a detailed examination of the current state of global initiatives and national pilot programs.

1.2 Defining Central Bank Digital Currencies

A CBDC can be precisely defined as a digital liability of a central bank that is made available to the general public or to a restricted group of financial institutions. It stands as a direct digital equivalent of physical cash for retail use or central bank reserves for wholesale use, distinct from commercial bank deposits, which are liabilities of commercial banks. The motivation for central banks to explore CBDCs is multifaceted and often includes:

• Enhancing Payment Efficiency and Innovation: Addressing the perceived shortcomings of existing payment systems, such as high costs, slow speeds, and limited operating hours, particularly for cross-border transactions.
• Promoting Financial Inclusion: Providing access to safe and efficient digital payment services for populations currently unbanked or underserved by traditional financial institutions.
• Maintaining Monetary Sovereignty: Counteracting the potential challenges posed by the rise of private digital currencies (e.g., stablecoins, cryptocurrencies) and foreign CBDCs, ensuring the central bank retains control over the national currency and payment system.
• Supporting Financial Stability: Enhancing the resilience of payment systems, providing a secure and reliable payment instrument, and potentially offering a new tool for managing financial crises.
• Facilitating Monetary Policy Transmission: Offering new channels for implementing monetary policy, especially in unconventional scenarios.

This report will systematically explore these motivations and their intricate implications, providing a comprehensive framework for understanding the evolving landscape of digital sovereign money.

Many thanks to our sponsor Panxora who helped us prepare this research report.

2. Types of CBDCs and Design Choices

CBDCs are generally categorized into two primary types based on their intended user base and functionality: retail CBDCs and wholesale CBDCs. The specific design choices within each category are critical, influencing everything from technological architecture to privacy safeguards and overall economic impact.

2.1 Retail CBDCs

Retail CBDCs, often referred to as ‘general purpose CBDCs,’ are digital currencies designed for use by the general public, encompassing individuals, households, and non-financial businesses, for their everyday transactions. Their core objective is to provide a widely accessible, digital alternative to physical cash, aiming to significantly enhance the efficiency, security, and inclusivity of domestic payment systems.

2.1.1 Motivations for Retail CBDCs

The compelling motivations behind the exploration and potential issuance of retail CBDCs are diverse:

• Addressing the Decline of Cash: In many advanced economies, the use of physical cash is steadily declining, raising concerns about the future availability of central bank money as a public good and a bedrock of the payment system. A retail CBDC could ensure continued access to risk-free central bank money in a digital format.
• Promoting Financial Inclusion: For individuals and communities underserved by traditional banking services, a retail CBDC could offer a low-cost, universally accessible digital payment method, fostering greater participation in the formal economy. This is particularly relevant in developing economies where financial exclusion remains a significant challenge (Bank for International Settlements, ‘Annual Economic Report 2021’, 2021).
• Fostering Payment Innovation: A CBDC could provide a robust and open platform for private sector innovation in payment services, potentially leading to the development of novel applications and improved user experiences. It could also introduce programmability features, allowing for ‘smart contracts’ or automated payments based on predefined conditions.
• Enhancing Competition: By providing a common, central bank-backed digital currency, a CBDC could foster greater competition among private payment service providers, potentially reducing fees and improving service quality.
• Maintaining Monetary Sovereignty: As private digital currencies and stablecoins gain traction, a retail CBDC allows the central bank to retain its central role in the monetary system and ensure the stability and integrity of the national currency.

2.1.2 Retail CBDC Models: Direct vs. Intermediated

Two primary models for retail CBDC issuance and distribution have been widely discussed:

• Direct CBDC (Single-Tiered): In this model, the central bank directly manages all CBDC accounts for end-users, handling all transactions. While offering maximum control and direct relationship with citizens, this model places a substantial operational burden on the central bank and might compete directly with commercial banks. Most central banks view this as less desirable due to its potential for disintermediation and the immense operational complexities it would entail (International Monetary Fund, ‘Monetary Policy and Financial Stability Implications of Central Bank Digital Currencies’, 2024 [elibrary.imf.org]).
• Intermediated CBDC (Two-Tiered): This is the prevailing model favored by most central banks, often referred to as a ‘hybrid’ or ‘synthetic’ model. Here, the central bank issues the CBDC to commercial banks and other supervised payment service providers (PSPs), who then distribute it to the general public. The central bank remains the ultimate ledger keeper and issuer, but the PSPs manage customer-facing activities, including onboarding, Know Your Customer (KYC)/Anti-Money Laundering (AML) checks, and customer service. This model leverages the existing financial infrastructure, minimizing disintermediation risks and allowing commercial banks to continue their role in credit provision and customer relationships. China’s digital yuan (e-CNY) largely operates on an intermediated model, with state-owned banks and private payment platforms like Alipay and WeChat Pay acting as distributors (Chainalysis, ‘Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDC)’, 2024 [chainalysis.com]).

2.2 Wholesale CBDCs

Wholesale CBDCs are digital currencies specifically designed for use by financial institutions that hold accounts at the central bank, primarily for interbank settlements, clearing, and the settlement of wholesale transactions, such as large-value payments or securities trades. They are not intended for public use.

2.2.1 Use Cases and Benefits

The primary motivations and benefits associated with wholesale CBDCs include:

• Enhanced Efficiency and Security for Interbank Settlements: Wholesale CBDCs, particularly those built on Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT), can enable faster, more efficient, and more secure settlement of interbank payments, reducing settlement risk and improving liquidity management for financial institutions.
• Facilitating Atomic Settlement: DLT-based wholesale CBDCs can enable ‘Delivery versus Payment’ (DvP) and ‘Payment versus Payment’ (PvP) atomic settlements, where the final transfer of two linked assets (e.g., securities and cash, or two currencies) occurs simultaneously. This eliminates counterparty risk and significantly reduces settlement failures in capital markets.
• Improving Cross-Border Payments: One of the most significant potential applications for wholesale CBDCs is the radical improvement of cross-border payments. Project mBridge, a multi-central bank initiative involving the Bank of International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hub, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority, the Bank of Thailand, the Digital Currency Institute of the People’s Bank of China, and the Central Bank of the United Arab Emirates, is a notable example. This project explores a multi-CBDC platform for international payments and foreign exchange (FX) settlement, aiming for faster, cheaper, and more transparent transactions (International Monetary Fund, ‘Digital Money and Central Bank Digital Currencies’, 2023 [elibrary.imf.org]). Other initiatives like Project Jasper (Bank of Canada) and Project Helvetia (Swiss National Bank) have similarly explored DLT for wholesale interbank settlements.
• Reducing Operational Costs: Streamlining settlement processes through DLT could lead to reduced operational costs for financial institutions.
• Increased Transparency: A DLT-based system could offer greater transparency and auditability for wholesale transactions, albeit within a permissioned environment.

2.3 Design Considerations: A Deep Dive

The successful implementation of any CBDC hinges on a series of intricate and pivotal design decisions. These choices reflect a careful balancing act between various objectives, including financial stability, privacy, efficiency, and innovation.

2.3.1 Technology Platform

The fundamental technological infrastructure choice is paramount, broadly categorized into centralized databases or Distributed Ledger Technologies (DLT).

• Centralized Databases: This traditional approach involves a central server controlled by the central bank. It offers well-understood security models, high transaction throughput, and proven scalability, often leveraging existing payment system architectures. Many central banks initially lean towards this option for its robustness and familiarity. Examples include early thoughts on the e-Krona in Sweden.
• Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT): Often associated with blockchain, DLT offers features like immutability, transparency (within a permissioned network), and resilience through distributed consensus. For CBDCs, a permissioned DLT (where only authorized participants can validate transactions) is typically considered to maintain central bank control and meet regulatory requirements. While DLT offers potential for atomic settlement and programmability, it faces challenges regarding scalability for retail volumes, transaction finality, and energy consumption for certain consensus mechanisms. Hybrid approaches, combining elements of both, are also under consideration, such as the digital euro’s investigation phase which evaluated both centralized and DLT options (European Central Bank, ‘Report on the digital euro investigation phase’, 2023).

2.3.2 Access Models

How users interact with the CBDC is a crucial design choice, primarily between account-based and token-based systems.

• Account-Based CBDC: Similar to traditional bank accounts, users would have an account with the central bank (in a direct model) or through an intermediary (in an intermediated model). Transactions are recorded as debits and credits to these accounts, requiring identity verification (KYC/AML). This model offers robust identity management and easier recovery of lost funds.
• Token-Based CBDC: Analogous to physical cash, the CBDC is represented as a digital token that can be held and transferred directly by users, often using cryptographic keys. This model can potentially offer greater privacy, akin to cash, and facilitate offline payments. However, managing security keys and the absence of inherent identity verification pose challenges for AML/CFT compliance and user recourse in case of theft or loss. Some central banks are exploring hybrid models to incorporate the benefits of both.

2.3.3 Privacy Features

Balancing user privacy with the imperative to prevent illicit activities (e.g., money laundering, terrorist financing) is one of the most challenging aspects of CBDC design. The level of privacy can vary:

• Tiered Privacy: This approach could allow for greater anonymity for small, everyday transactions (similar to cash), while larger transactions would require more rigorous identification and traceability. This can be achieved through techniques like transaction value limits for anonymous transfers.
• Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs): Advanced cryptographic techniques like ZKPs could allow users to prove they meet certain criteria (e.g., age, residency) without revealing underlying personal data, offering enhanced privacy while still enabling compliance checks.
• Role of Intermediaries: In an intermediated model, private sector intermediaries would typically conduct KYC/AML checks, with the central bank having access to aggregated or anonymized transaction data, or only obtaining access to specific transaction data under strict legal conditions and for legitimate purposes (e.g., law enforcement investigations) (Bank for International Settlements, ‘Annual Economic Report 2023’, 2023).

2.3.4 Interoperability

Seamless integration of a CBDC with existing domestic and international financial infrastructures is non-negotiable for its success.

• Domestic Interoperability: The CBDC must be compatible with existing real-time gross settlement (RTGS) systems, instant payment schemes, and commercial bank infrastructure to avoid fragmentation of the payment landscape. It should also facilitate integration with point-of-sale (POS) systems, online payment gateways, and mobile wallets.
• Cross-Border Interoperability: For international payments, interoperability can be achieved through various models: direct bilateral linkages between national CBDC systems, common technical standards, or the development of multilateral platforms like Project mBridge. These initiatives aim to overcome the complexities of foreign exchange, differing legal frameworks, and varying regulatory standards to make cross-border payments faster, cheaper, and more transparent (BIS, ‘Project mBridge: Connecting economies through multi-CBDC arrangements’, 2023 [elibrary.imf.org]).

2.3.5 Remuneration and Interest

A critical design choice is whether the CBDC will bear interest.

• Interest-Bearing CBDC: A central bank could choose to pay interest on CBDC holdings, potentially even negative interest rates. This could provide a direct channel for monetary policy transmission, allowing central banks to directly influence demand and savings. However, it could also make CBDC significantly more attractive than commercial bank deposits, potentially leading to disintermediation.
• Non-Interest-Bearing CBDC: Designed to mimic physical cash, a non-interest-bearing CBDC would avoid competing with commercial bank deposits on interest rates, thereby mitigating disintermediation risks. Most central banks currently exploring retail CBDCs lean towards a non-interest-bearing design for this reason.

2.3.6 Limits and Caps

Many central banks are considering imposing limits on the amount of CBDC an individual can hold or transact.

• Holding Limits: Caps on individual CBDC holdings are often proposed to mitigate financial stability risks, specifically the potential for large-scale deposit outflows from commercial banks into CBDC during periods of stress. This aims to preserve the commercial banking sector’s primary role in credit intermediation.
• Transaction Limits: Daily or per-transaction limits could also be implemented to manage the operational load, deter illicit activities, or encourage the use of commercial bank money for larger transactions, maintaining a clear distinction between the roles of central bank money and commercial bank money.

Many thanks to our sponsor Panxora who helped us prepare this research report.

3. Economic and Social Implications

The introduction of CBDCs carries profound and far-reaching economic and social implications, potentially reshaping monetary policy effectiveness, financial stability dynamics, the very fabric of privacy and security, and the landscape of financial inclusion.

3.1 Monetary Policy

CBDCs have the potential to significantly enhance the transmission and effectiveness of monetary policy, offering central banks new, more direct tools to influence economic activity. However, they also present unique challenges.

3.1.1 Enhanced Transmission Mechanism

• Direct Access to Central Bank Money: A retail CBDC could provide a direct conduit for the central bank’s monetary policy impulses to reach the broader economy. Changes in policy rates could instantaneously affect the interest rate on CBDC, influencing aggregate demand and savings behaviour more directly than through traditional bank-centric channels.
• Circumventing the Zero Lower Bound (ZLB): An interest-bearing CBDC, particularly one capable of bearing negative interest rates, could potentially allow central banks to push policy rates below the effective ZLB. In a severe downturn, this could provide additional monetary stimulus, overcoming a constraint faced by conventional monetary policy (CEPR, ‘Monetary policy and financial stability implications of central bank digital currencies’, 2020 [cepr.org]).
• Targeted Stimulus: In crisis scenarios, a programmable CBDC could enable highly targeted fiscal or monetary interventions, such as direct welfare payments or emergency aid, directly to citizens, potentially bypassing commercial bank bottlenecks and accelerating the impact of stimulus measures.

3.1.2 Challenges to Monetary Policy Operations

• Impact on Bank Reserves: If a CBDC leads to a significant shift of deposits from commercial banks to the central bank, it could reduce commercial banks’ reserves, potentially affecting their lending capacity and liquidity management. Central banks would need to adjust their liquidity provision operations to accommodate such shifts.
• Financial Market Operations: The introduction of a CBDC might require central banks to rethink their open market operations and other liquidity management tools to ensure effective control over short-term interest rates and money market conditions.
• Data and Analytics: While a CBDC could generate vast amounts of transactional data, careful consideration would be needed regarding its collection, anonymization, and utilization for monetary policy analysis, balancing insights with privacy concerns.

3.2 Financial Stability

The implications of CBDCs for financial stability are complex, presenting both potential enhancements to systemic resilience and new risks that must be carefully managed through thoughtful design.

3.2.1 Potential for Disintermediation

• Deposit Migration: A primary concern is the potential for ‘digital runs’ or large-scale, rapid shifts of deposits from commercial banks into a perceived ‘safer’ central bank liability (the CBDC) during periods of financial stress. This could severely impact banks’ funding structures, reduce their ability to lend, and necessitate significant central bank liquidity support (IMF, ‘Central Bank Digital Currencies and Financial Stability’, 2024 [elibrary.imf.org]).
• Mitigation Strategies: To counter disintermediation risks, central banks are exploring several design features: imposing caps or limits on CBDC holdings, implementing tiered interest rates (e.g., zero interest up to a certain threshold, negative interest above it), or designing the CBDC to be non-interest-bearing. These measures aim to make commercial bank deposits more attractive for savings and credit intermediation.

3.2.2 Impact on Bank Business Models

• Funding Costs: If deposit funding becomes less abundant or more volatile due to CBDC, commercial banks’ funding costs could increase, potentially leading to higher lending rates for businesses and consumers.
• Liquidity Management: Banks would need to adapt their liquidity management strategies to account for the dynamic flow of CBDC. Central banks would also need to refine their emergency liquidity assistance frameworks.

3.2.3 Enhancing Payment System Resilience

• Alternative Payment Rail: A CBDC could provide a robust, alternative payment rail that is resilient to disruptions affecting private payment networks. In the event of widespread technical failures or cyberattacks targeting commercial banks, the CBDC system could ensure continuity of payments.
• Reduced Settlement Risk: For wholesale CBDCs, atomic settlement of transactions significantly reduces settlement risk in financial markets, enhancing overall systemic stability.

3.2.4 Cybersecurity Risks

While CBDCs can enhance resilience, they also consolidate financial data and value within a single central system, potentially creating a single point of failure. This elevates the importance of robust cybersecurity measures to protect against cyberattacks, data breaches, and counterfeiting attempts. A successful attack on a CBDC system could have systemic implications.

3.3 Privacy and Security

CBDCs raise significant and often contentious issues concerning privacy and transactional security, demanding a delicate balance between individual rights and public interest objectives.

3.3.1 Balancing Privacy and Traceability

• The Privacy Spectrum: Unlike physical cash, which offers anonymity, digital transactions inherently leave a data trail. Striking the right balance is crucial. Too much anonymity could facilitate illicit activities, while excessive traceability could infringe on individual privacy rights and civic freedoms. Many proposals consider a ‘hybrid privacy’ model: pseudonymity for most transactions with the possibility of de-anonymization under strict legal and judicial oversight for specific cases (e.g., AML/CFT investigations, tax evasion).
• Data Governance: Clear frameworks are needed to define who has access to transaction data, under what conditions, and for how long. This involves legal guarantees, strong data protection regulations, and robust technical safeguards against unauthorized access.
• Public Trust: Public acceptance of a CBDC will heavily depend on how effectively privacy concerns are addressed and communicated. Perceptions of government surveillance could severely hinder adoption.

3.3.2 Cybersecurity and Counterfeiting

• System Integrity: The entire CBDC infrastructure, from issuance to settlement and storage, must be impervious to cyberattacks. This requires state-of-the-art encryption, multi-layered security protocols, continuous monitoring, and rapid response capabilities.
• Protection Against Counterfeiting: The digital nature of CBDC necessitates robust cryptographic techniques to prevent unauthorized duplication or alteration of the digital currency units. Public key infrastructure (PKI) and advanced ledger technologies play a crucial role in ensuring the authenticity and integrity of each CBDC unit.
• Resilience: The system must be resilient to various shocks, including power outages, network disruptions, and natural disasters, ensuring continuous availability of payments.

3.4 Financial Inclusion

CBDCs offer a promising avenue to advance financial inclusion, but realizing this potential requires addressing significant challenges.

3.4.1 Bridging the Digital Divide

• Access for the Unbanked: CBDCs can provide a secure and low-cost digital payment method for individuals who lack access to traditional bank accounts or credit cards, often due to high fees, geographical barriers, or insufficient documentation. This could enable greater participation in the digital economy.
• Lower Transaction Costs: For marginalized populations, traditional payment methods can be expensive due to fees. A CBDC, especially if designed for low or no transaction costs, could make financial services more affordable.
• Offline Functionality: To ensure inclusion for populations with limited internet access or unreliable electricity, some central banks are exploring offline CBDC capabilities, allowing transactions to occur without real-time network connectivity, similar to physical cash (Bank of England, ‘The digital pound: A new form of money for households and businesses?’, 2023).

3.4.2 Addressing Barriers to Adoption

• Digital Literacy: Even with accessible technology, digital literacy remains a significant barrier. Education and user-friendly interfaces are crucial to ensure broad adoption, particularly among older populations or those less familiar with digital tools.
• Infrastructure Requirements: Widespread adoption necessitates robust digital infrastructure, including reliable internet connectivity and readily available, affordable smart devices. Gaps in this infrastructure could exacerbate existing inequalities.
• Accessibility for Disabilities: CBDC design must ensure accessibility for individuals with disabilities, incorporating features that cater to diverse needs.

3.5 International Implications

The emergence of CBDCs carries significant international ramifications, influencing global finance, trade, and even geopolitical dynamics.

3.5.1 Cross-Border Payments Transformation

• Efficiency Gains: CBDCs, particularly wholesale ones and multi-CBDC platforms, hold the potential to radically improve cross-border payments by reducing costs, increasing speed, and enhancing transparency. The current correspondent banking system is often criticized for its slowness, opacity, and high fees.
• Reducing FX Risk: Atomic PvP settlement facilitated by DLT-based wholesale CBDCs can eliminate foreign exchange settlement risk, a major concern in international finance.

3.5.2 Currency Competition and Geopolitics

• Reserve Currency Status: While unlikely to immediately dislodge major reserve currencies, the widespread adoption of specific CBDCs, especially by major economic blocs, could incrementally influence global currency hierarchies over the long term. A highly efficient and widely accepted CBDC could enhance a currency’s international appeal.
• Sanctions Evasion: The design of CBDCs, particularly concerning privacy and traceability, could have implications for international sanctions regimes. Central banks would need to ensure their CBDCs comply with international AML/CFT standards and cooperate on information sharing to prevent their use for illicit purposes.
• Interoperability Standards: The development of common international standards for CBDCs will be critical to prevent fragmentation of the global financial system and foster seamless cross-border transactions. This requires significant international cooperation among central banks and regulatory bodies.

Many thanks to our sponsor Panxora who helped us prepare this research report.

4. Global Developments and Pilot Programs

As of 2024, the global landscape for CBDC development is characterized by accelerating activity, with numerous countries moving beyond conceptual research into concrete design and pilot phases. This reflects a worldwide trend towards exploring the practical implications and benefits of digital sovereign money.

4.1 China: The Digital Yuan (e-CNY)

China stands as a definitive frontrunner in the practical implementation and widespread piloting of a retail CBDC, the digital yuan, or e-CNY. Its journey began in 2014 with theoretical exploration, evolving into large-scale pilots by 2020.

• Scope and Scale: The e-CNY has been piloted extensively in over 20 cities and regions, covering a significant portion of the Chinese population. By late 2023, transactional volumes surpassed 100 billion transactions, indicating significant public adoption and integration into daily life (Chainalysis, ‘Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDC)’, 2024 [chainalysis.com]).
• Design and Features: The e-CNY operates on a two-tier system, where the People’s Bank of China (PBOC) issues the CBDC to commercial banks, which then distribute it to consumers via digital wallets. Key features include:
  • Offline Payments: The e-CNY supports ‘dual-offline’ payments, allowing transactions even without network connectivity, which enhances its accessibility in areas with poor internet infrastructure.
  • Programmability: While still in early stages, the e-CNY allows for basic programmability, enabling features like conditional payments (e.g., consumption vouchers that expire or can only be used for specific goods).
  • Controlled Anonymity: The system provides a degree of ‘controllable anonymity’, offering lower levels of identity verification for small, everyday transactions, while requiring full KYC for larger amounts.
• Motivations: China’s motivations extend beyond mere payment efficiency to include maintaining monetary sovereignty in a highly digitized economy (dominated by private payment platforms like Alipay and WeChat Pay), promoting financial inclusion, and potentially enhancing the efficiency of cross-border trade in the long term, although this aspect is still nascent.

4.2 European Union: The Digital Euro

The European Central Bank (ECB) and the Eurosystem have embarked on a comprehensive multi-year project to investigate the potential of a digital euro, driven by the rapid digitalization of payments and the decline of cash.

• Investigation Phase (2021-2023): This phase focused on design and distribution models, privacy, and the digital euro’s impact on financial stability. The ECB has emphasized a non-interest-bearing digital euro, with limits on holdings to mitigate disintermediation risks. A key finding was the need for private intermediaries to handle customer-facing interactions, ensuring a two-tier system (European Central Bank, ‘Report on the digital euro investigation phase’, 2023).
• Preparation Phase (Started late 2023): This phase will lay the groundwork for potential future issuance, including developing rulebooks, selecting providers, and conducting technical preparations. A legislative proposal from the European Commission is also underway to establish a legal framework.
• Key Design Principles: The digital euro aims to be universally accessible, easy to use, resilient, and provide a high level of privacy for small payments, while adhering to AML/CFT regulations for larger transactions. It is envisioned as a complement to cash, not a replacement.

4.3 United States: Cautious Exploration

The United States has adopted a markedly more cautious and research-intensive approach to CBDC, reflecting a robust debate on its necessity, benefits, and potential risks, particularly concerning privacy and the role of commercial banks.

• Federal Reserve’s Stance: The Federal Reserve has emphasized that no decision has been made regarding a digital dollar, focusing instead on extensive research and public consultation. Its January 2022 paper, ‘Money and Payments: The U.S. Dollar in the Age of Digital Transformation’, outlined potential benefits and risks, inviting public comment.
• Focus on Research and Dialogue: The US approach prioritizes understanding the complex implications for monetary policy, financial stability, privacy, and international competitiveness. The emphasis is on a deliberative process to assess whether a CBDC would genuinely serve the public interest and address identified deficiencies in the current payment system.
• Political and Public Debate: The discussion around a digital dollar in the US is highly politicized, with significant concerns raised by various stakeholders regarding government surveillance, potential disintermediation of commercial banks, and the impact on financial privacy. For instance, some political figures have voiced strong opposition, citing concerns over privacy and potential government overreach. A Reuters report, for example, highlighted a hypothetical scenario from January 2025 where former President Donald Trump signed an executive order banning the issuance of a digital dollar, reflecting significant political resistance to the concept in certain circles (Reuters, ‘Trump’s digital dollar ban gives China, Europe’s CBDCs free rein’, 2025 [reuters.com]). This illustrates the intensity of the debate and the substantial hurdles to be overcome for any potential US CBDC.

4.4 United Kingdom: The Digital Pound

The Bank of England and HM Treasury launched a joint Taskforce in 2021 to explore a potential digital pound, leading to a consultation paper in early 2023.

• Motivations: The UK’s exploration is driven by the declining use of cash, the need for resilient payment infrastructure, and the desire to foster innovation in payments. The digital pound is envisioned as a complement to cash and bank deposits.
• Design Principles: Key proposals include a two-tier model involving private sector innovators, a non-interest-bearing design, and robust privacy features. The Bank of England has emphasized that the digital pound would not be programmable money controlled by the central bank for specific spending purposes.
• Project Rosalind: In collaboration with the BIS Innovation Hub, the Bank of England has explored innovative retail payment use cases for a CBDC, focusing on design features that could support future private sector innovation.

4.5 Other Notable Global Initiatives

Numerous other countries are actively researching or piloting CBDCs, reflecting diverse motivations and approaches.

• Sweden (e-Krona): As one of the first countries to seriously consider a retail CBDC, Sweden’s Riksbank launched the e-Krona pilot project in 2020, driven by the rapid decline in cash usage. Their focus is on ensuring continued access to central bank money and fostering payment system resilience. The pilot has explored DLT-based solutions and offline payment capabilities (Riksbank, ‘The e-krona pilot’, 2022).
• India (Digital Rupee – e₹): India launched both wholesale and retail CBDC pilots in late 2022, aiming to reduce operational costs, promote financial inclusion, and boost payment efficiency. The retail pilot uses a token-based system distributed by commercial banks (Reserve Bank of India, ‘Concept Note on Central Bank Digital Currency’, 2022).
• Brazil (DREX): Brazil is developing DREX (formerly Digital Real), a wholesale CBDC focused on tokenizing financial assets and enabling smart contracts within a regulated environment, aiming to bring greater efficiency to financial transactions.
• Canada (Project Jasper): The Bank of Canada has been at the forefront of wholesale CBDC research, notably through Project Jasper (in collaboration with Payments Canada and several commercial banks), exploring DLT for interbank payments and securities settlement.
• Switzerland (Project Helvetia): The Swiss National Bank (SNB), in collaboration with the BIS Innovation Hub, has explored the settlement of tokenized assets with wholesale CBDC, demonstrating the potential for integration with DLT platforms for financial markets.
• Nigeria (eNaira): Launched in 2021, Nigeria’s eNaira is Africa’s first retail CBDC, primarily aimed at promoting financial inclusion, improving payment efficiency, and reducing the cost of cash management. Its adoption has faced challenges but represents a significant step for the region.

These diverse initiatives underscore the global recognition of CBDCs’ potential, while also highlighting the varied national priorities and regulatory landscapes that shape their development.

Many thanks to our sponsor Panxora who helped us prepare this research report.

5. Challenges and Considerations

The ambitious endeavor of implementing CBDCs presents a multitude of complex challenges that extend across technological, regulatory, societal, and geopolitical dimensions. Addressing these considerations is paramount for successful and beneficial integration into the global financial ecosystem.

5.1 Technological Infrastructure

The backbone of any CBDC is its underlying technological infrastructure, which must meet exceptionally high standards of performance, security, and resilience.

• Scalability and Performance: A retail CBDC, especially, would need to process millions, if not billions, of transactions daily, requiring immense scalability, low latency, and high transaction throughput comparable to or exceeding existing private payment systems. This presents significant engineering challenges, particularly for DLT-based solutions.
• Resilience and Redundancy: The system must be able to withstand various shocks, including cyberattacks, natural disasters, and power outages. This necessitates robust backup systems, disaster recovery protocols, and geographical dispersion of infrastructure to ensure continuous availability.
• Cybersecurity: As discussed, a CBDC system represents a critical national infrastructure asset and a prime target for sophisticated cyberattacks. Implementing state-of-the-art encryption, multi-factor authentication, intrusion detection systems, and continuous vulnerability assessments is non-negotiable.
• Energy Efficiency: For DLT-based CBDCs, the energy consumption of certain consensus mechanisms (e.g., Proof of Work) is a significant concern. Design choices must prioritize environmentally sustainable solutions.
• Quantum Resistance: With the theoretical advent of quantum computing, current cryptographic standards could be vulnerable. CBDC systems must be designed with foresight, potentially incorporating quantum-resistant cryptographic algorithms to ensure long-term security.

5.2 Regulatory Frameworks

Establishing a comprehensive and adaptable legal and regulatory framework is critical for governing CBDC issuance, usage, and oversight.

• Legal Tender Status: Defining the legal tender status of a CBDC, its acceptance by merchants, and its role in debt discharge are fundamental legal considerations. This involves amendments to existing monetary laws.
• Privacy Laws: Specific legislation is needed to govern data collection, storage, access, and usage related to CBDC transactions, ensuring compliance with national and international privacy standards (e.g., GDPR in the EU).
• Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Combating the Financing of Terrorism (CFT): The regulatory framework must integrate CBDC into existing AML/CFT regimes, defining the roles of the central bank and intermediaries in transaction monitoring and suspicious activity reporting. This requires careful balancing with privacy considerations.
• Cross-Border Legal Challenges: For international CBDC use, agreements on jurisdiction, data sharing, and regulatory harmonization across different sovereign legal systems will be necessary to facilitate seamless cross-border payments.
• Consumer Protection: Regulations must safeguard users against fraud, technical glitches, and ensure clear mechanisms for dispute resolution and recourse.

5.3 Public Acceptance and Trust

The success of a CBDC ultimately hinges on its adoption by the public, which requires cultivating trust and demonstrating clear benefits.

• Trust in the Central Bank: Public trust in the central bank as the issuer and guardian of the currency is paramount. Any erosion of this trust, particularly regarding privacy or security, could severely undermine adoption.
• User Experience (UX): The CBDC payment experience must be intuitive, convenient, and reliable. A cumbersome or unreliable system will deter adoption, regardless of its underlying merits.
• Perceived Benefits: The public needs to clearly understand ‘what’s in it for them.’ If a CBDC does not offer distinct advantages over existing payment methods (e.g., lower costs, greater security, enhanced accessibility), adoption will be limited.
• Addressing Misconceptions: Public education campaigns will be necessary to dispel myths and address concerns about surveillance, government control over spending, or the risk of bank disintermediation.
• Inclusion for All Demographics: Strategies must be in place to ensure that vulnerable populations, the elderly, or those with limited digital literacy are not excluded, but rather empowered by CBDC.

5.4 Interoperability

Ensuring seamless interaction between a CBDC and the broader financial ecosystem is a complex but vital challenge.

• Domestic System Integration: The CBDC must operate smoothly with existing payment infrastructures (e.g., real-time payment systems), commercial bank accounts, digital wallets, and point-of-sale terminals. Fragmented payment landscapes would reduce efficiency and utility.
• International Interoperability: For cross-border payments, achieving interoperability between different national CBDCs, or with traditional payment systems, is crucial. This involves developing common technical standards, harmonizing legal and regulatory frameworks, and establishing governance models for multilateral platforms (e.g., via the BIS Innovation Hub).
• Coexistence with Other Digital Currencies: The CBDC must be able to coexist and potentially integrate with private stablecoins and other digital assets, ensuring a coherent and stable digital financial ecosystem without undermining central bank authority.

5.5 Geopolitical Implications and Global Governance

CBDCs carry significant geopolitical weight, influencing international economic relations and necessitating global cooperation.

• International Currency Dynamics: The successful adoption of a major economy’s CBDC could influence its currency’s international standing, trade invoicing, and capital flows. This raises questions about potential ‘digital currency wars’ or shifts in global reserve currency status.
• Sanctions and Financial Integrity: As noted, the design of CBDCs could impact the effectiveness of international sanctions regimes. Ensuring that CBDCs are not used to bypass legitimate financial regulations requires global coordination among central banks and financial intelligence units.
• Need for Multilateral Cooperation: Given the inherently cross-border nature of finance, the development of CBDCs necessitates extensive international dialogue and cooperation to establish common principles, standards, and regulatory approaches, preventing a fragmented and inefficient global digital currency landscape. Forums like the G7, G20, BIS, and IMF play crucial roles in facilitating these discussions.

Many thanks to our sponsor Panxora who helped us prepare this research report.

6. Conclusion

Central Bank Digital Currencies represent a significant and multifaceted evolution in the financial sector, presenting both unprecedented opportunities and considerable challenges. Their exploration by central banks worldwide is a testament to the ongoing digital transformation of money and payments, driven by a confluence of factors including the declining use of cash, the rise of private digital assets, and the imperative to foster more efficient, resilient, and inclusive financial systems.

On one hand, CBDCs offer compelling potential benefits: they can dramatically enhance the efficiency of domestic and cross-border payments, reduce transaction costs, and provide a secure, risk-free digital alternative to physical cash. Furthermore, they hold the promise of strengthening financial inclusion by extending digital payment access to underserved populations and could provide central banks with more direct and effective tools for monetary policy transmission, particularly in unconventional economic environments. The potential for programmability could also unlock new forms of innovation in financial services, allowing for more precise and automated financial interactions.

However, the path to successful CBDC implementation is fraught with complex challenges. Paramount among these are the intricate trade-offs between user privacy and the essential need for transaction traceability to combat illicit financial activities. The potential for financial instability, particularly the risk of disintermediation of commercial banks and the resultant impact on their critical role in credit provision, demands meticulous design features such as holding limits and tiered remuneration. Furthermore, the technological infrastructure required for a truly scalable, resilient, and cyber-secure CBDC system is immense, requiring substantial investment and expertise. Establishing robust and adaptable legal and regulatory frameworks, ensuring public trust and broad acceptance through clear communication and intuitive design, and navigating the complexities of domestic and international interoperability are equally critical hurdles.

Ongoing research, extensive public consultations, and diverse pilot programs across the globe continue to explore these intricate aspects, refining design choices and assessing real-world implications. The varied approaches observed, from China’s extensive e-CNY rollout to the European Union’s methodical investigation of the digital euro and the United States’ cautious research stance, underscore the nuanced considerations specific to each jurisdiction’s economic and political context. Ultimately, the successful development and deployment of CBDCs will necessitate a delicate balance between fostering innovation, preserving financial system integrity, safeguarding privacy, and ensuring broad public benefit. International cooperation will be indispensable to harmonize standards and prevent fragmentation, thereby maximizing the collective advantages of this transformative digital financial frontier.

Many thanks to our sponsor Panxora who helped us prepare this research report.

References

• Bank for International Settlements. (2021). ‘Annual Economic Report 2021’. Basel, Switzerland.
• Bank for International Settlements. (2023). ‘Annual Economic Report 2023’. Basel, Switzerland.
• Bank for International Settlements. (2023). ‘Project mBridge: Connecting economies through multi-CBDC arrangements’. BIS Innovation Hub. elibrary.imf.org
• Bank of England. (2023). ‘The digital pound: A new form of money for households and businesses?’. Consultation Paper.
• Chainalysis. (2024). ‘Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDC): What They Are & Why They Matter’. chainalysis.com
• CEPR. (2020). ‘Monetary policy and financial stability implications of central bank digital currencies’. VoxEU.org. cepr.org
• European Central Bank. (2023). ‘Report on the digital euro investigation phase’. Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
• International Monetary Fund. (2023). ‘Digital Money and Central Bank Digital Currencies’. IMF Working Paper WP/23/7. elibrary.imf.org
• International Monetary Fund. (2024). ‘Central Bank Digital Currencies and Financial Stability’. IMF Staff Discussion Note SDN/2024/001. elibrary.imf.org
• Reuters. (2025). ‘Trump’s digital dollar ban gives China, Europe’s CBDCs free rein’. (Speculative future report cited in original article). reuters.com
• Riksbank. (2022). ‘The e-krona pilot – Phase 2’. Report. Stockholm, Sweden.
• Reserve Bank of India. (2022). ‘Concept Note on Central Bank Digital Currency’. Mumbai, India.