Nuclear Fission: A Strategic Solution to AI’s Energy Demands

Abstract

The relentless and accelerating demand for energy from artificial intelligence (AI) technologies and the global proliferation of data centers present a profound and escalating challenge to existing power infrastructure and climate goals. This comprehensive research report systematically examines nuclear fission as a strategic, high-density, and stable baseload energy solution to underpin the computational intensity of the AI era. It delves into the fundamental principles of nuclear fission, elucidating its unparalleled energy density and inherent capacity for continuous, reliable power generation, which are critical attributes for AI operations demanding uninterrupted energy supply. A central focus is placed on the transformative potential of next-generation nuclear technologies, particularly Small Modular Reactors (SMRs), which promise to revolutionize nuclear power deployment through their scalability, modular construction, enhanced safety protocols, and reduced environmental footprint. The analysis incorporates recent global developments, including significant investment initiatives and strategic deployments by major technology firms, alongside a rigorous evaluation of the economic complexities, regulatory landscapes, and societal considerations pertinent to SMR implementation. Furthermore, the report explores the intricate pathways and significant advantages of integrating nuclear power directly into AI-driven industries, highlighting its capacity to foster a carbon-neutral and resilient digital infrastructure. The objective is to provide an in-depth understanding of how advanced nuclear energy can serve as a cornerstone for sustainable AI development, mitigating the environmental impact while ensuring robust energy security for future technological growth.

Many thanks to our sponsor Panxora who helped us prepare this research report.

1. Introduction

The dawn of the artificial intelligence epoch has ushered in an unprecedented surge in computational demand, data processing, and digital storage. This exponential growth, fueled by innovations in machine learning, deep learning, and large language models (LLMs), has translated directly into a monumental increase in energy consumption. Hyperscale data centers, the foundational infrastructure for AI, now rival small cities in their power requirements, straining existing electrical grids and presenting a formidable hurdle to global decarbonization efforts. The conventional reliance on fossil fuels to meet these expanding energy needs exacerbates climate change, while the intermittency of many renewable sources necessitates expensive and often resource-intensive backup systems, which may not align with the unwavering power demands of critical AI workloads.

In response to this looming energy crisis for the digital age, a critical imperative has emerged to identify and deploy power solutions that are not only sustainable and carbon-free but also capable of delivering high-density, reliable, and continuous electricity. Among the spectrum of available energy technologies, nuclear fission, with its established track record of generating vast quantities of electricity with minimal greenhouse gas emissions, stands out as a uniquely compelling candidate. For decades, traditional nuclear power plants have served as vital sources of baseload power, characterized by their high capacity factors and independence from environmental variables, making them ideal for industries requiring consistent energy flows.

However, the deployment of large, gigawatt-scale nuclear reactors has historically been accompanied by challenges related to substantial upfront capital costs, extended construction timelines, and complex site-specific regulatory hurdles. It is within this context that the advent of Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) represents a paradigm shift. SMRs embody a revolutionary approach to nuclear reactor design, emphasizing factory fabrication, modular assembly, and inherent safety characteristics. These innovations are poised to mitigate many of the historical barriers to nuclear deployment, offering a pathway for more flexible, scalable, and economically viable nuclear energy solutions. Their smaller footprint and design simplicity make them particularly attractive for integration into diverse energy ecosystems, including the direct powering of data centers and other AI-intensive operations.

This report aims to provide a detailed analysis of nuclear fission, particularly through the lens of SMR technology, as a strategic imperative for powering the future of AI. It will explore the inherent advantages of nuclear power in terms of energy density and baseload stability, detail the technological advancements embodied by SMRs, examine the current landscape of SMR development and deployment, evaluate the complex economic and regulatory considerations, and finally, articulate the profound implications and advantages of integrating nuclear energy directly into the burgeoning AI infrastructure. By synthesizing these elements, the report seeks to underscore the indispensable role of advanced nuclear technology in enabling a sustainable, secure, and energy-abundant future for artificial intelligence.

Many thanks to our sponsor Panxora who helped us prepare this research report.

2. Nuclear Fission: Fundamentals, Energy Density, and Baseload Stability

To fully appreciate the strategic significance of nuclear fission in addressing the energy demands of AI, it is essential to understand its fundamental principles, its exceptional energy density, and its unparalleled capacity for baseload stability.

2.1 Fundamentals of Nuclear Fission

Nuclear fission is a nuclear reaction in which the nucleus of an atom splits into two or more smaller, lighter nuclei, releasing a tremendous amount of energy in the process. This reaction is typically initiated by bombarding a heavy, unstable atomic nucleus, such as Uranium-235 ($^{235}$U) or Plutonium-239 ($^{239}$Pu), with a neutron. When the neutron strikes the nucleus, it causes the nucleus to become unstable and split, simultaneously releasing additional neutrons, gamma rays, and a significant amount of kinetic energy. These newly released neutrons can then go on to strike other fissile nuclei, initiating a self-sustaining chain reaction. This controlled chain reaction is the core principle behind nuclear power generation.

In a typical pressurized water reactor (PWR) or boiling water reactor (BWR), which constitute the majority of the world’s operational nuclear fleet, the heat generated by this chain reaction is used to boil water, producing high-pressure steam. This steam then drives a turbine connected to an electrical generator, converting thermal energy into mechanical energy and subsequently into electrical energy. The process is meticulously controlled through the use of control rods, typically made of neutron-absorbing materials like cadmium or boron, which can be inserted or withdrawn from the reactor core to regulate the rate of the chain reaction and thus the power output.

2.2 Unparalleled Energy Density

One of the most profound advantages of nuclear fission is the extraordinarily high energy density of its fuel. The amount of energy released per unit mass in nuclear fission is orders of magnitude greater than that released in chemical combustion reactions, such as the burning of fossil fuels. For instance, the fission of a single atom of Uranium-235 yields approximately 200 MeV (Mega-electron Volts) of energy, which is about 10 million times the energy released by burning a single molecule of coal or oil.

To put this into a more tangible perspective, a single uranium fuel pellet, roughly the size of a human fingertip, contains as much energy as 17,000 cubic feet of natural gas, 1,780 pounds of coal, or 149 gallons of oil, according to the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI). This incredible energy density translates into several critical benefits:

• Minimal Fuel Requirements: Nuclear power plants require a relatively small amount of fuel to generate massive amounts of electricity, reducing the logistical challenges and environmental impact associated with fuel extraction, transportation, and storage compared to fossil fuel plants.
• Reduced Waste Volume: Although nuclear waste is highly radioactive and requires careful management, the volume of waste produced is remarkably small. All the used nuclear fuel ever produced by U.S. nuclear power plants over the last 60 years would fit on a single football field, stacked less than 10 yards high (NEI). This contrasts sharply with the vast quantities of atmospheric pollutants and solid waste (e.g., coal ash) generated by fossil fuel combustion.
• Small Operational Footprint: The compact nature of nuclear fuel and the high power output per unit area mean that nuclear power plants have a relatively small physical footprint compared to renewable energy installations of equivalent capacity (e.g., solar farms or wind parks), making them suitable for land-constrained areas or co-location with industrial facilities like data centers.

For AI and data centers, which are often characterized by dense computational loads and increasing power demands within confined spaces, the high energy density of nuclear fuel offers an efficient and potent solution to deliver the requisite power without necessitating extensive fuel handling or land occupation.

2.3 Baseload Stability: The Uninterrupted Power Source

Baseload power refers to the minimum amount of electric power delivered or required over a given period, representing the constant, foundational electricity demand of an electrical grid. Baseload power plants are designed to operate continuously at a high capacity factor, providing a stable and reliable supply of electricity 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, regardless of weather conditions or time of day. This is precisely where nuclear power excels.

Nuclear reactors are inherently designed for baseload operation. Once brought online, they typically run for extended periods—often 18 to 24 months—before needing to shut down for refueling and maintenance. Their power output is predictable and largely independent of external factors such as sunlight (solar), wind speed (wind), or water availability (hydro). This fundamental characteristic makes nuclear power an ideal candidate for industries that cannot tolerate power interruptions, such as AI and data centers.

For AI operations, uninterrupted power supply is not merely a convenience; it is a critical operational requirement. Large-scale AI model training can take weeks or even months, and an unexpected power outage can lead to significant data loss, corruption of computational states, and substantial financial repercussions from lost productivity and increased re-training costs. Moreover, data centers house vast arrays of servers that generate considerable heat, necessitating continuous and reliable power for cooling systems. A failure in the power supply to these cooling systems can quickly lead to hardware damage and catastrophic data loss.

In contrast to intermittent renewable energy sources like solar and wind, which fluctuate with environmental conditions, nuclear power provides firm, dispatchable power. While renewables are crucial for decarbonization, their inherent variability necessitates costly and complex grid management solutions, including extensive energy storage (batteries) or reliance on fossil fuel peaking plants, to maintain grid stability. Nuclear power, by providing a constant, non-carbon-emitting baseload, can significantly enhance grid resilience and complement the integration of variable renewables, creating a more robust and sustainable energy mix.

In summary, the combination of nuclear fission’s astounding energy density and its proven capacity for stable baseload power generation positions it as an exceptionally compelling solution for the escalating and continuous energy demands of the artificial intelligence sector. These fundamental attributes lay the groundwork for understanding why next-generation nuclear technologies, particularly SMRs, are gaining significant traction in strategic planning for future digital infrastructure.

Many thanks to our sponsor Panxora who helped us prepare this research report.

3. The Rise of Next-Generation Nuclear Technologies: Small Modular Reactors (SMRs)

While the foundational principles of nuclear fission have long been understood, the application of this technology has historically been dominated by large, gigawatt-scale reactors. However, a new wave of innovation in nuclear engineering has given rise to Small Modular Reactors (SMRs), which represent a significant paradigm shift. SMRs aim to address the limitations of traditional nuclear power plants by offering enhanced flexibility, scalability, safety, and economic viability.

3.1 Definition and Core Characteristics

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) defines SMRs as advanced nuclear reactors that produce electricity of up to 300 MW(e) per unit, though some definitions extend this to 500 MW(e). The ‘modular’ aspect refers to their factory fabrication and assembly, allowing for standardized, mass production of components that can then be transported to a site for installation. This contrasts sharply with the bespoke, on-site construction prevalent for large reactors. Key characteristics of SMRs include:

• Smaller Size and Power Output: Ranging from a few megawatts up to approximately 300 MWe, SMRs are considerably smaller than traditional reactors, which typically exceed 1,000 MWe.
• Modular Construction: Components and systems are designed to be fabricated in factories, then shipped and assembled on site. This approach offers significant advantages in quality control, construction schedule predictability, and cost reduction.
• Enhanced Safety Features: SMR designs often incorporate inherent or passive safety systems that rely on natural forces like gravity, convection, or heat conduction, rather than active components like pumps and valves, to ensure safety even in the event of an accident.
• Scalability: Multiple SMR units can be deployed incrementally to match growing energy demands, providing greater flexibility for grid planners and industrial users.
• Reduced Footprint: Their compact design requires less land area, making them suitable for a wider range of potential sites, including existing industrial sites or areas with limited space.

3.2 Design Innovations and Technological Diversity

SMRs are not a monolithic technology but rather a diverse class of reactors employing various designs, coolants, and fuel types, all striving for improved performance, safety, and economics.

3.2.1 Light Water Reactor (LWR) SMR Variants

Many SMR designs are evolutions of the well-understood light water reactor technology, building on decades of operational experience. These typically use ordinary water as both coolant and neutron moderator.

• NuScale Power VOYGR: This is perhaps one of the most recognized LWR-SMR designs. The NuScale reactor module is a Pressurized Water Reactor (PWR) housed within an integral reactor vessel, simplifying the design by integrating the steam generator and pressurizer into a single unit. Each module can generate 77 MWe (previously 50 MWe) and can be deployed in a power plant configuration of up to 12 modules, totaling 924 MWe. A key feature is its passive safety system, which allows the reactor to safely shut down and cool itself for an indefinite period without operator action or external AC power, relying solely on natural circulation and heat transfer to a passive containment cooling system. The NuScale design was the first SMR to receive design certification from the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) in 2020, a significant regulatory milestone.
• Rolls-Royce SMR: The UK-based Rolls-Royce SMR is also a PWR design, aiming for a power output of 470 MWe. Its distinguishing feature is a focus on extreme standardization and factory manufacturing, with an estimated 90% of components built in factories. The design emphasizes modularity to drastically reduce on-site construction time and cost, targeting a three-year build time per unit once the site is prepared.

3.2.2 High-Temperature Gas Reactors (HTGRs)

HTGRs use graphite as a neutron moderator and an inert gas (typically helium) as the coolant. They operate at much higher temperatures than LWRs, enabling higher thermal efficiency and opening up applications beyond electricity generation, such as industrial process heat or hydrogen production.

• X-energy Xe-100: This advanced HTGR design generates approximately 80 MWe per module and utilizes Tristructural-isotropic (TRISO) fuel. TRISO fuel consists of uranium oxycarbide kernels encased in multiple layers of ceramic materials, providing an extremely robust containment for fission products that can withstand very high temperatures without melting. The Xe-100 leverages passive safety principles, including a reactor core that cannot melt down, even under extreme accident conditions, due to the inherent properties of the fuel and the graphite moderator. Its high operating temperature (up to 750°C) makes it ideal for both electricity generation and providing high-quality process heat for various industrial applications, including direct air capture for carbon removal or hydrogen production.
• China’s HTR-PM: The High-Temperature Reactor Pebble-bed Module (HTR-PM) is a demonstration project in China, consisting of two pebble-bed HTGRs connected to a single steam turbine. Each reactor unit has a thermal power output of 250 MWth (100 MWe). It uses spherical fuel elements (pebbles) containing TRISO particles. The HTR-PM achieved grid connection in December 2021, marking a significant milestone as the world’s first fourth-generation nuclear reactor to enter commercial operation, demonstrating the viability of HTGR technology.

3.2.3 Molten Salt Reactors (MSRs)

MSRs represent a fundamentally different approach, using a liquid salt mixture as both the fuel and the coolant. The fuel is dissolved directly into the molten salt.

• Kairos Power (KP-FHR): This company is developing a Fluoride Salt-Cooled High-Temperature Reactor (FHR) that uses solid TRISO fuel pebbles cooled by a low-pressure molten fluoride salt. This design combines the benefits of TRISO fuel (inherent safety) with molten salt coolant (high temperature, passive heat removal). Kairos Power’s approach focuses on rapid development and testing through multiple iterations.
• Terrestrial Energy (IMSR): Their Integral Molten Salt Reactor (IMSR) is a 195 MWe design where the entire reactor core and associated components are housed within a replaceable cartridge, designed for a seven-year operating period. MSRs offer potential advantages like online refueling (reducing downtime), lower operating pressures, and the ability to consume nuclear waste from traditional reactors, as well as greater proliferation resistance.

3.2.4 Fast Neutron Reactors (FNRs)

FNRs, also known as fast breeder reactors, use fast neutrons to sustain the chain reaction and can ‘breed’ new fissile material from fertile material like Uranium-238. They also have the potential to significantly reduce the volume and radiotoxicity of nuclear waste.

• NewCleo (Lead-Cooled Fast Reactor): NewCleo is developing a Lead-Cooled Fast Reactor (LFR) with a power output around 200 MWe. LFRs use liquid lead or lead-bismuth eutectic as the coolant. Lead has a high boiling point, good neutron economy, and provides excellent shielding. LFRs can operate at high temperatures and have the potential to ‘burn’ transuranic waste, reducing the long-term radiotoxicity of spent fuel.

3.2.5 Microreactors

Microreactors are a subset of SMRs, even smaller in scale, typically generating less than 10-20 MWe. They are designed for extreme portability, rapid deployment, and autonomous operation, making them suitable for very remote communities, military bases, disaster relief, and potentially direct powering of critical infrastructure like modular data centers.

• Oklo Aurora: This microreactor design is a fast reactor that uses heat pipes to transfer heat from the core to a power conversion system, eliminating the need for pumps. It is designed for multi-decade operation without refueling.
• NuScale Energy Multiplier Module (EMM): While not a microreactor itself, some SMR developers are exploring very small variants or single modules for distributed power applications.

3.3 Advantages Beyond Electricity: Process Heat and Hydrogen Production

The higher operating temperatures of advanced SMRs, particularly HTGRs and MSRs, unlock significant potential beyond mere electricity generation. They can provide high-quality process heat directly to industrial applications, which typically rely on fossil fuels. This includes sectors such as chemical manufacturing, petroleum refining, cement production, and desalination. Furthermore, this high-temperature heat can be efficiently utilized for large-scale, carbon-free hydrogen production through methods like high-temperature steam electrolysis or thermochemical water splitting, offering a pathway to decarbonize heavy industry and transportation.

For AI and data centers, the ability to generate both electricity and process heat could open doors for advanced cooling solutions. Instead of solely relying on traditional vapor compression chillers, nuclear-generated heat could power absorption chillers or contribute to district heating/cooling networks, further enhancing the overall energy efficiency and sustainability of digital infrastructure. The sheer diversity and innovation within the SMR landscape underscore their potential to transform the global energy sector and specifically address the multifaceted energy demands of the AI revolution.

Many thanks to our sponsor Panxora who helped us prepare this research report.

4. Recent Developments and Strategic Deployments of SMRs for AI

The theoretical advantages of SMRs are increasingly being validated by concrete developments and strategic deployment initiatives across the globe. A significant trend is the growing interest from the technology sector, particularly companies grappling with the immense energy footprint of their AI and cloud computing operations.

4.1 Amazon’s Cascade Advanced Energy Facility: A Blueprint for Hyperscale AI Power

Perhaps one of the most significant recent announcements highlighting the direct relevance of SMRs to AI energy needs came from Amazon Web Services (AWS). In late 2023, Amazon unveiled plans for the ‘Cascade Advanced Energy Facility’ in Richland, Washington. This ambitious project aims to co-develop a modular nuclear power facility designed to meet the burgeoning energy demands of its future AI and cloud operations.

• Technology Choice: The facility will deploy Xe-100 SMRs, developed by X-energy. As discussed, the Xe-100 is a High-Temperature Gas Reactor (HTGR) that uses advanced TRISO fuel and employs passive safety features. Each Xe-100 unit is rated at 80 megawatts (MWe) of electrical power and 200 megawatts of high-temperature process heat.
• Scalable Deployment: The initial plan involves deploying a cluster of Xe-100 units, with potential expansion to 12 units capable of delivering up to 960 MWe of carbon-free electricity. This modular approach aligns perfectly with the scalable and often unpredictable growth patterns of data center infrastructure, allowing AWS to add power capacity incrementally as its computational needs evolve.
• Strategic Location: Richland, Washington, is a site with significant historical ties to nuclear energy, including the Hanford Site. This location benefits from existing infrastructure, a skilled workforce experienced in nuclear operations, and established regulatory pathways, which can potentially streamline the project’s development and licensing. The state of Washington is also keen on promoting clean energy solutions.
• Implications for Hyperscalers: Amazon’s commitment signals a crucial shift among hyperscale cloud providers, acknowledging that traditional renewable energy sources (wind, solar) alone, even when coupled with battery storage, may not be sufficient or cost-effective to meet the continuous, high-density power requirements of next-generation AI. This move could set a precedent for other technology giants to explore similar nuclear energy partnerships, fundamentally altering the energy procurement strategies for the digital economy.
• Process Heat Advantage: The Xe-100’s ability to provide high-temperature process heat offers AWS additional opportunities for energy efficiency, potentially for advanced cooling systems, desalination, or even future industrial applications co-located with their data centers.

4.2 U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Initiatives and Funding

The U.S. government, recognizing the strategic importance of advanced nuclear technology, has been a key driver in supporting SMR development and deployment through significant funding and programmatic initiatives.

• Generation III+ SMR Program: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has reissued a solicitation for up to $900 million to support the development and deployment of Gen III+ SMRs. This initiative, part of the broader Advanced Reactor Demonstration Program (ARDP), aims to accelerate the commercialization of advanced reactor technologies. The funding de-risks initial projects, helping to bridge the gap between design and deployment, and focuses on enhancing the domestic nuclear supply chain, developing a skilled workforce, and addressing the growing energy demands from critical sectors like AI and data centers.
• Advanced Reactor Demonstration Program (ARDP): Launched in 2020, ARDP provides cost-shared funding to industry partners to build advanced reactors, including SMRs, within the next decade. This program directly supports projects like the X-energy Xe-100 and TerraPower’s Natrium reactor, emphasizing demonstration projects that prove the technologies’ commercial viability and operational performance.
• Carbon Free Power Project (CFPP) and NuScale: The DOE initially supported the Utah Associated Municipal Power Systems (UAMPS) Carbon Free Power Project (CFPP), which aimed to deploy a NuScale VOYGR power plant. While the CFPP was ultimately cancelled in late 2023 due to escalating costs and insufficient subscriber interest, it provided invaluable lessons on the challenges of first-of-a-kind (FOAK) engineering, regulatory processes, and market acceptance. Despite this setback, the NuScale design remains the only SMR design certified by the NRC, maintaining its pioneering status.
• Loan Guarantees and Tax Credits: Beyond direct grants, the DOE’s Loan Programs Office offers significant loan guarantees for innovative energy projects, including nuclear. Additionally, various tax incentives, such as the Investment Tax Credit (ITC) and Production Tax Credit (PTC) under the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), are being expanded to include nuclear energy, further incentivizing private sector investment in SMRs.

4.3 International SMR Landscape and Global Collaborations

SMR development is a global endeavor, with numerous countries investing heavily in the technology.

• United Kingdom (Rolls-Royce SMR): The UK government has actively supported Rolls-Royce SMR, providing significant funding and designating it as a national priority. Rolls-Royce aims to deploy its 470 MWe PWR design, with recent agreements including a memorandum of understanding with the Czech power company CEZ for potential deployment in the Czech Republic, and a collaboration with Siemens Energy for the supply of critical equipment, demonstrating cross-border industrial partnerships.
• Canada: Canada is a leader in SMR development and deployment, particularly with Ontario Power Generation (OPG) and its partnership with GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy to deploy the BWRX-300 SMR (a 300 MWe Boiling Water Reactor) at the Darlington site. This project is on an accelerated timeline, with commercial operation targeted for 2028. Canada’s SMR Action Plan outlines a comprehensive strategy for domestic and international deployment, recognizing the technology’s potential for remote communities, heavy industry, and export markets.
• China: Beyond the HTR-PM, China continues to invest in various SMR designs, including ACP100 (a 125 MWe PWR) and other advanced concepts, leveraging its extensive domestic nuclear industry and strong government support to rapidly develop and deploy new reactor technologies.
• South Korea: Companies like Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power (KHNP) are developing their own SMR designs, such as the SMART (System-integrated Modular Advanced Reactor), a 100 MWe PWR, which received standard design approval from the Korean regulatory body in 2012 and has been actively promoted for export, particularly for desalination and remote power needs.
• France: While historically focused on large PWRs, France, through EDF, is also exploring SMR development with its Nuward project, a 170 MWe PWR design aimed at both domestic use and export to countries seeking to replace aging fossil fuel plants or meet new industrial demands.

These recent developments underscore a growing global consensus on the strategic importance of SMRs. The commitment of major technology companies like Amazon, coupled with substantial government backing and international collaboration, indicates a clear trajectory towards the widespread adoption of SMRs as a critical component of a decarbonized and resilient energy future, particularly for the power-hungry demands of advanced AI infrastructure.

Many thanks to our sponsor Panxora who helped us prepare this research report.

5. Economic Considerations and Overcoming Challenges

While the technological promise of SMRs for powering AI and data centers is significant, their successful deployment hinges on navigating a complex landscape of economic, regulatory, and social challenges. These factors determine the ultimate viability and pace of SMR adoption.

5.1 Capital Investment and Cost Efficiency

Nuclear power projects, by their very nature, are capital-intensive undertakings. The initial upfront investment required for the design, licensing, construction, and commissioning of a nuclear power plant, even an SMR, remains substantial. Historically, large nuclear projects have been plagued by cost overruns and schedule delays, impacting investor confidence.

• First-of-a-Kind (FOAK) Costs: A significant portion of the initial high costs for SMRs stems from ‘first-of-a-kind’ engineering and regulatory expenses. The first few deployments of any new SMR design will incur these substantial non-recurring costs, which include detailed design finalization, validation testing, licensing application fees, and establishing supply chains. These costs are then amortized over subsequent units as the technology matures and scales.
• The NuScale VOYGR Example: The cancellation of the Utah Associated Municipal Power Systems’ (UAMPS) Carbon Free Power Project (CFPP) in 2023, which intended to deploy NuScale VOYGR SMRs, serves as a stark reminder of these economic hurdles. The project’s cost estimate per unit of power significantly increased, primarily due to rising construction costs, supply chain pressures, and higher financing rates, leading to insufficient subscriber interest to make the project economically viable. This highlighted the difficulty of attracting sufficient early adopters for innovative, capital-intensive projects without substantial de-risking mechanisms.
• Modular Construction Benefits: SMRs aim to mitigate these traditional cost challenges through their modular construction and factory fabrication approach. By shifting construction from complex, bespoke on-site builds to standardized, repeatable factory production lines, SMR developers anticipate significant cost reductions through:
  • Economies of Series Production: As more units are manufactured, production costs are expected to decrease, similar to other manufactured goods.
  • Improved Quality Control: Factory environments allow for stricter quality assurance, reducing defects and rework.
  • Reduced On-site Labor: Less complex and time-consuming on-site assembly lowers labor costs and minimizes exposure to unpredictable construction site variables.
  • Shorter Construction Schedules: Standardized designs and pre-fabricated modules aim to dramatically reduce construction durations, thereby lowering financing costs (interest during construction) and accelerating revenue generation.
• Financing Mechanisms: To bridge the gap during the initial deployment phase, various financing mechanisms are critical:
  • Government Subsidies and Grants: As seen with the U.S. DOE’s ARDP, government support is essential for de-risking early SMR projects.
  • Loan Guarantees: Government-backed loan guarantees can reduce the cost of capital for developers.
  • Public-Private Partnerships: Collaborations between government entities and private industry, often with shared risk-reward structures.
  • Innovative Utility Models: Exploring alternative ownership and operating models beyond traditional utilities, potentially involving industrial end-users like hyperscale data center operators.

5.2 Regulatory Approvals and Licensing Complexity

The nuclear industry is perhaps the most heavily regulated sector globally, and rightly so, given the paramount importance of safety. Navigating the regulatory landscape for nuclear reactors involves rigorous, multi-stage safety assessments and compliance with stringent national and international standards. This complexity can significantly extend project timelines and increase costs.

• Lengthy Processes: Obtaining regulatory approvals, including site permits, construction permits, and operating licenses, can take a decade or more for traditional reactors. While SMRs are designed to streamline this, the first-of-a-kind regulatory review for new designs is still a comprehensive process.
• Design Certification: The U.S. NRC’s design certification process for SMRs, exemplified by NuScale’s approval, is intended to standardize a reactor design for future deployments, reducing the need for repeated detailed reviews for each subsequent plant. However, each specific plant still requires a Combined License (COL) and site-specific environmental reviews.
• Harmonization Efforts: International efforts, particularly by the IAEA, are underway to harmonize regulatory requirements across different countries. This would facilitate the global deployment of SMR designs by reducing the need for costly and time-consuming re-licensing in each new jurisdiction.
• Adapting to New Models: The regulatory framework may need adaptation for scenarios where non-traditional nuclear operators, such as technology companies, might own or co-own SMRs to power their data centers. This could require new models for licensing, oversight, and operational responsibility.

5.3 Supply Chain Development and Industrial Capacity

The global nuclear supply chain has significantly atrophied since the peak of new plant construction decades ago. Rebuilding this specialized industrial capacity is a critical challenge for SMR deployment.

• Specialized Manufacturing: Manufacturing nuclear-grade components (reactor pressure vessels, steam generators, pumps, valves) requires specialized foundries, fabrication facilities, and a highly skilled workforce with specific certifications and quality control procedures. Many of these capabilities need to be revitalized or newly established.
• Workforce Development: There is a global shortage of nuclear engineers, welders, technicians, and operators. Significant investment in education, training, and apprenticeship programs is necessary to meet the projected demand for SMR deployment.
• Domestic vs. Global Sourcing: While a global supply chain can offer cost advantages, strategic imperatives often drive desires for domestic sourcing to ensure energy security and industrial resilience. Balancing these factors is crucial.

5.4 Public Acceptance and Perception

Despite nuclear power’s strong safety record compared to other energy sources, public perception remains a significant challenge, largely shaped by historical accidents like Chernobyl and Fukushima.

• Historical Legacy: The legacy of past accidents and concerns over nuclear waste persist. Educating the public on the enhanced safety features of SMRs (e.g., passive safety, smaller core size, walk-away safety) and the robust waste management protocols is crucial.
• Waste Management: While SMRs produce less waste volume, the issue of long-term disposal of high-level radioactive waste remains a societal challenge that requires durable, politically acceptable solutions (e.g., deep geological repositories). Advanced reactors (like fast reactors) also offer the potential to recycle or ‘burn’ a significant portion of existing waste, which could improve public acceptance.
• Siting Issues: Gaining local community acceptance for SMR siting requires transparent communication, economic benefits sharing, and addressing environmental justice concerns.

5.5 Market Competition and Integration with Renewables

The energy market is highly competitive, with rapidly declining costs for renewable energy technologies like solar photovoltaics and wind power.

• Levelized Cost of Electricity (LCOE): SMRs face competition from renewables, which often have lower LCOEs, especially in regions with abundant sun and wind. However, LCOE for renewables often does not fully account for the costs of intermittency, grid integration, and large-scale storage required to provide firm, 24/7 power. SMRs offer firm power, which needs to be valued correctly in market mechanisms.
• Complementary Role: Rather than direct competition, SMRs are increasingly seen as complementary to renewables. They can provide the stable baseload and flexible load following capabilities that integrate variable renewables into a reliable, decarbonized grid. Hybrid energy systems combining SMRs with renewables and battery storage are a promising pathway.
• Process Heat Markets: SMRs’ ability to provide high-temperature process heat opens new markets beyond just electricity generation, where they may have a significant competitive advantage over electric-only alternatives.

Addressing these complex economic, regulatory, and societal challenges is paramount for SMRs to fulfill their potential. Government support, innovative financing, supply chain revitalization, public engagement, and clear market valuation of their unique attributes will be critical to their widespread success in powering the future, including the escalating demands of AI infrastructure.

Many thanks to our sponsor Panxora who helped us prepare this research report.

6. Strategic Integration of Nuclear Power into AI Infrastructure

The distinct characteristics of nuclear power, particularly through the lens of SMRs, align exceptionally well with the unique and rigorous demands of modern AI infrastructure. Strategic integration of these technologies can create a more resilient, sustainable, and powerful foundation for the digital economy.

6.1 The Extreme Demands of AI and Data Centers

Artificial intelligence, from training sophisticated large language models to powering real-time inference engines, requires an unprecedented and continuous supply of electricity. Data centers, the physical embodiment of AI infrastructure, are becoming increasingly power-intensive.

• Power Density: Modern data centers are characterized by rising rack densities, meaning more computational power (and thus more electricity consumption) is packed into smaller physical footprints. A single AI server rack can consume tens of kilowatts, equivalent to several average homes. Hyperscale data centers can consume hundreds of megawatts, comparable to a medium-sized city.
• Unwavering Reliability: The operational integrity of AI systems demands near-perfect uptime. Downtime, even for brief periods, can result in substantial financial losses, data corruption, and disruption of critical services. For AI models undergoing training, an interruption can mean weeks or months of lost computational progress and expensive re-runs.
• Constant Cooling Load: The high power density of AI servers generates immense heat. Effective and continuous cooling is paramount to prevent hardware failure and maintain optimal performance. Cooling systems themselves are significant energy consumers and require an absolutely reliable power supply.
• Sustainability Imperatives: Major technology companies, including those heavily invested in AI, have aggressive net-zero and carbon-free energy goals. They are under increasing pressure from investors, regulators, and consumers to demonstrate environmentally responsible operations.
• Scalability on Demand: The growth of AI workloads is often unpredictable and rapid. Data center operators need power solutions that can scale efficiently and incrementally to match this evolving demand without over-committing capital prematurely.

6.2 Operational Synergies and Advantages of Integration

Integrating SMRs directly into or in close proximity to AI data centers offers a compelling array of operational synergies and strategic advantages.

• Stable and Predictable Power Supply: SMRs provide a consistent, 24/7 baseload power source, eliminating the intermittency issues associated with many renewables. This unwavering reliability is fundamental for AI operations, ensuring continuous computation, uninterrupted cooling, and maximum uptime. For critical AI applications like autonomous systems, medical diagnostics, or financial modeling, this reliability is non-negotiable.
• Reduced Transmission Losses and Grid Independence: Colocating power generation with data centers significantly reduces electricity transmission losses, which can account for a substantial percentage of generated power in long-distance transmission. It also enhances the energy independence of the data center, reducing its reliance on a potentially congested or vulnerable central grid. For data centers located in remote areas or those seeking enhanced security, this distributed generation model is highly attractive.
• Site Selection Flexibility: The relatively smaller footprint of SMRs compared to large nuclear plants or expansive renewable farms allows for greater flexibility in site selection. They can be deployed on brownfield sites, existing industrial parks, or near established data center clusters, minimizing the need for new greenfield development and associated infrastructure.
• Carbon-Free Energy: Utilizing nuclear fission directly addresses the sustainability goals of AI companies by providing a virtually carbon-free power source. This helps companies meet their ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) targets and contributes to global decarbonization efforts, allowing the growth of AI to proceed with a significantly reduced environmental footprint.
• Process Heat for Advanced Cooling: As discussed in Section 3, advanced SMR designs, particularly HTGRs, can produce high-temperature process heat in addition to electricity. This heat can be harnessed for advanced data center cooling solutions, such as absorption chillers, which use heat rather than electricity to drive the cooling cycle. This integrated approach can significantly improve the overall energy efficiency of a data center and reduce its reliance on electricity for cooling, which can be up to 40% of a data center’s total energy consumption.
• Energy Security and Resilience: By providing a dedicated, secure, and resilient power source, SMRs enhance the overall energy security of AI infrastructure, protecting against grid disturbances, cyber threats to grid infrastructure, or geopolitical instabilities affecting energy supply chains.

6.3 Future Vision: DC Data Centers and Advanced Thermal Management

The integration possibilities extend to future data center designs. As computing hardware increasingly moves towards direct current (DC) power, SMRs could potentially be designed to produce DC power directly, eliminating inefficient AC/DC conversion losses. Furthermore, the high-temperature capabilities of certain SMRs could drive innovative thermal management solutions beyond traditional cooling, such as liquid immersion cooling with waste heat recovery for other beneficial uses, creating a highly synergistic energy ecosystem.

6.4 Challenges and Considerations for AI-Nuclear Integration

While the advantages are compelling, direct integration of SMRs with AI infrastructure also presents unique challenges that require careful consideration:

• Physical and Cyber Security: The colocation of a nuclear facility with a data center necessitates extremely robust physical and cybersecurity measures for both entities. The convergence of operational technology (OT) in nuclear plants with the information technology (IT) systems of data centers presents a complex new attack surface that must be secured against sophisticated threats.
• Regulatory Frameworks for Non-Traditional Operators: Existing nuclear regulatory frameworks are primarily designed for utility operators. New regulatory pathways or adaptations may be required to accommodate technology companies potentially owning or operating SMRs directly, or engaging in joint ventures. This includes considerations for licensing, training, and operational oversight.
• Financial Models and Risk Allocation: Innovative financial models will be needed to support tech companies investing in and taking ownership stakes in nuclear assets. This will involve new forms of risk assessment, insurance, and possibly government incentives to de-risk the initial deployments.
• Public Perception and Acceptance: Siting a nuclear facility, even an SMR, adjacent to a major data center may raise public concerns. Clear, transparent communication and community engagement strategies will be vital to build trust and acceptance.

Despite these challenges, the strategic alignment between the unyielding energy demands of AI and the inherent strengths of nuclear power, particularly through SMRs, makes their integration an increasingly attractive and perhaps indispensable pathway for the sustainable and resilient future of digital infrastructure.

Many thanks to our sponsor Panxora who helped us prepare this research report.

7. Conclusion

The exponential growth of artificial intelligence and the consequent proliferation of hyperscale data centers are pushing the boundaries of global energy infrastructure, demanding power solutions that are not only robust and reliable but also environmentally sustainable. This report has underscored that nuclear fission, particularly through the innovation of Small Modular Reactors (SMRs), presents a viable, strategic, and increasingly indispensable solution to meet these escalating energy demands.

At its core, nuclear fission offers an unparalleled combination of high energy density and baseload stability. The ability of a small amount of nuclear fuel to generate immense quantities of continuous, carbon-free electricity aligns perfectly with the uninterrupted power requirements of AI training, inference, and the critical cooling systems essential for data center operation. Unlike intermittent renewables, nuclear power provides firm, dispatchable energy, crucial for maintaining grid stability and ensuring the resilience of digital infrastructure.

Next-generation nuclear technologies, specifically SMRs, represent a transformative leap forward. Their modular construction, scalable deployment, and enhanced passive safety features address many of the historical barriers associated with large-scale nuclear power. Designs like NuScale’s VOYGR, X-energy’s Xe-100, and the Rolls-Royce SMR exemplify the diversity and innovation within this sector, promising reduced construction times, lower capital costs through factory fabrication, and significantly safer operational profiles. Furthermore, the potential of many SMR designs to provide high-temperature process heat extends their utility beyond electricity generation, opening avenues for advanced data center cooling, hydrogen production, and industrial decarbonization.

Recent developments, such as Amazon’s strategic investment in an Xe-100 SMR facility for its AWS operations, signal a critical turning point where major technology companies are recognizing nuclear power as a direct solution for their carbon-free, high-reliability energy needs. This private sector engagement, coupled with robust U.S. Department of Energy initiatives and global government support for SMR development in countries like Canada, the UK, and China, indicates a strong commitment to de-risking and accelerating the commercial deployment of these advanced technologies.

However, the successful integration of nuclear energy into AI infrastructure is not without its hurdles. Significant economic challenges, including high upfront capital investment and first-of-a-kind engineering costs, necessitate continued government support, innovative financing models, and the realization of economies of series production. The complex and lengthy regulatory approval processes must also evolve to accommodate new technologies and potential non-traditional operators. Furthermore, rebuilding a robust nuclear supply chain, developing a skilled workforce, and addressing public acceptance concerns through transparent communication and effective waste management strategies are paramount.

Despite these considerations, the strategic advantages of integrating nuclear power into AI infrastructure are compelling: stable and predictable power supply, reduced transmission losses through co-location, enhanced energy security, and a substantial contribution to corporate and global decarbonization targets. As AI continues its trajectory of exponential growth, demanding ever-increasing amounts of reliable and clean energy, nuclear fission, particularly through the versatile and safe platform of SMRs, emerges not merely as an option, but as an indispensable cornerstone for building a sustainable, resilient, and energy-abundant future for artificial intelligence.

Continued research and development, supportive policy frameworks, streamlined regulatory processes, and proactive collaboration between industry stakeholders, policymakers, and local communities will be essential to fully realize the transformative potential of advanced nuclear energy in powering the future of AI and indeed, the entire global digital economy.

Many thanks to our sponsor Panxora who helped us prepare this research report.

References

• Associated Press. (2024, November 7). Czech power company CEZ signs deal with Britain’s Rolls-Royce SMR to build modular nuclear reactors. Retrieved from apnews.com
• Financier Worldwide. (2025, May). The future of power is small modular reactors: development and financing overview. Retrieved from financierworldwide.com
• International Atomic Energy Agency. (2023). What are Small Modular Reactors (SMRs)? Retrieved from iaea.org
• IEEE Spectrum. (2025, May 29). U.S. Pushes $900M for Small Modular Reactors. Is That Enough? Retrieved from spectrum.ieee.org
• Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI). (n.d.). The Power of Nuclear: Fuel. Retrieved from nei.org
• Reuters. (2025, February 28). Siemens Energy to supply Rolls-Royce with equipment for small nuclear reactors. Retrieved from reuters.com
• Reuters. (2025, May 29). US approves NuScale’s bigger nuclear reactor design. Retrieved from reuters.com
• Reuters. (2025, December 2). US to provide up to $800 million to support small reactors. Retrieved from reuters.com
• tomshardware.com. (n.d.). Amazon Unveils Plans for Modular Nuclear Plant in Washington. Retrieved from tomshardware.com
• U.S. Department of Energy. (n.d.). Advanced Small Modular Reactors (SMRs). Retrieved from energy.gov
• U.S. Department of Energy. (2025). 5 Key Resilient Features of Small Modular Reactors. Retrieved from energy.gov
• U.S. Department of Energy. (2025). Generation III+ Small Modular Reactor Program. Retrieved from energy.gov
• Wikipedia. (n.d.). Energy Multiplier Module. Retrieved from en.wikipedia.org
• Wikipedia. (n.d.). HTR-PM. Retrieved from en.wikipedia.org
• Wikipedia. (n.d.). Kairos Power. Retrieved from en.wikipedia.org
• Wikipedia. (n.d.). NewCleo. Retrieved from en.wikipedia.org
• Wikipedia. (n.d.). NuScale Power. Retrieved from en.wikipedia.org
• X-energy. (n.d.). Advanced Small Modular Nuclear Reactors (SMRs). Retrieved from x-energy.com
• YouTube. (2024, December 19). Research and development of small modular reactors (SMRs), next-generation nuclear power generation. Retrieved from youtube.com