Abstract
The cryptocurrency industry has witnessed a surge in the adoption of point-based reward systems, particularly in the context of airdrops. These mechanisms aim to incentivize user engagement by requiring participants to perform specific activities to accumulate points, which subsequently influence their eligibility for token distributions. While designed to promote fairness and genuine interaction, these systems have introduced complexities and opacities that may affect user experience and project outcomes. This research report provides a comprehensive examination of point-based reward systems across various cryptocurrency projects, analyzing their implementations, effectiveness in fostering authentic user engagement versus incentivizing ‘grinding’ behaviors, design principles for transparency and user experience, and their success rates in achieving community growth and token distribution objectives.
Many thanks to our sponsor Panxora who helped us prepare this research report.
1. Introduction
The evolution of cryptocurrency projects has led to the development of innovative mechanisms aimed at fostering community engagement and ensuring equitable token distribution. One such mechanism is the point-based reward system, which requires users to engage in various activities to earn points, thereby determining their eligibility for token airdrops. This approach seeks to mitigate exploitation by traders who rapidly acquire and liquidate tokens, a practice that undermines the integrity of airdrop initiatives. However, the implementation of point-based systems has introduced new challenges, including increased complexity and reduced transparency for users. This report delves into the multifaceted aspects of point-based reward systems, offering a critical analysis of their design, implementation, and impact on both users and projects.
Many thanks to our sponsor Panxora who helped us prepare this research report.
2. Literature Review
2.1. Emergence of Point-Based Reward Systems
The concept of point-based reward systems in the cryptocurrency domain has gained traction as a strategy to enhance user engagement and deter exploitative behaviors. Projects like Blur and Tensor have pioneered the integration of point systems into their platforms, successfully boosting trading volumes and user participation. These systems typically involve users earning points through activities such as engaging with social platforms, supplying liquidity on decentralized finance (DeFi) applications, or trading on decentralized exchanges (DEXs). The accumulation of points then influences their eligibility for future token distributions, aligning user incentives with project growth objectives.
2.2. Advantages and Disadvantages
The adoption of point-based reward systems offers several advantages:
-
User Acquisition and Engagement: By rewarding users for specific actions, projects can attract a broader user base and encourage active participation.
-
Control Over Token Distribution: Projects retain the ability to manage the distribution of tokens, potentially reducing the impact of speculative behaviors and ensuring that rewards are aligned with user contributions.
However, these systems also present notable disadvantages:
-
Complexity and Opacity: The criteria for earning points and the process of converting points into tokens are often opaque, leading to user confusion and potential disengagement.
-
Potential for ‘Grinding’ Behaviors: Users may focus on repetitive tasks solely to accumulate points, which can distort the intended user experience and may not contribute meaningfully to the project’s ecosystem.
2.3. Case Studies
Several projects have implemented point-based reward systems with varying degrees of success:
-
Blur: The NFT marketplace Blur introduced a point system that rewarded users for listing and bidding on NFTs. This approach significantly increased user activity and market share. However, the aggressive tactics employed led to market volatility and criticism regarding the sustainability of such strategies.
-
Friend.Tech: This decentralized social networking app utilized an off-chain points system to reward user interactions, generating substantial speculation and attracting a large user base. Despite initial success, the centralized and opaque nature of its points distribution led to exploitation by professional farmers, resulting in a significant price crash post-token launch and a loss of community trust.
-
EigenLayer: A restaking protocol that used ‘Restaked Points’ to reward Ethereum validators for their contributions to network security. This model focused on institutional participants and aimed to incentivize behaviors that directly contribute to the project’s long-term success.
These case studies highlight the diverse applications and outcomes of point-based reward systems, underscoring the importance of thoughtful design and transparent implementation.
Many thanks to our sponsor Panxora who helped us prepare this research report.
3. Methodology
This research employs a qualitative approach, analyzing existing literature, case studies, and expert opinions to assess the effectiveness of point-based reward systems in cryptocurrency projects. Data sources include academic papers, industry reports, and reputable news outlets. The analysis focuses on the design principles of these systems, their impact on user behavior, and their success in achieving project objectives.
Many thanks to our sponsor Panxora who helped us prepare this research report.
4. Analysis and Discussion
4.1. Design Principles for Effective Point-Based Reward Systems
To create an effective point-based reward system, projects should consider the following design principles:
-
Alignment with Project Goals: The points system should incentivize behaviors that directly contribute to the project’s success, such as increasing liquidity, enhancing user engagement, or promoting governance participation.
-
Transparency and Fairness: Clear communication regarding how points are earned, accumulated, and converted into tokens is crucial for building trust within the community. Ambiguity in these processes can lead to user dissatisfaction and disengagement.
-
Gamification and User Engagement: Incorporating elements of gamification, such as leaderboards, achievement levels, and milestone rewards, can enhance user experience and motivation. However, it is essential to balance these elements to prevent the system from becoming overly complex or exploitative.
-
Adaptability and Scalability: The points system should be flexible enough to adapt to the project’s evolving needs and scalable to accommodate growth in the user base and transaction volume.
4.2. Impact on User Behavior
The implementation of point-based reward systems has a significant impact on user behavior:
-
Positive Engagement: When designed effectively, these systems can foster genuine user engagement, encouraging participants to interact meaningfully with the platform and contribute to its growth.
-
‘Grinding’ Behaviors: Conversely, poorly designed systems may incentivize users to engage in repetitive tasks solely to accumulate points, leading to a distorted user experience and potential exploitation of the system.
-
Exploitation and Gaming: The opacity and complexity of some point systems can lead to exploitation by professional farmers and bots, undermining the integrity of the reward mechanism and potentially harming the project’s reputation.
4.3. Success Rates in Achieving Project Objectives
The success of point-based reward systems in achieving project objectives varies:
-
Community Growth: Projects like Blur have successfully used point systems to rapidly expand their user base and increase market share.
-
Token Distribution Goals: The effectiveness of these systems in achieving equitable token distribution is mixed. While they can reduce speculative behaviors, they may also lead to user dissatisfaction if the rewards do not meet expectations or if the system is perceived as unfair.
Many thanks to our sponsor Panxora who helped us prepare this research report.
5. Conclusion
Point-based reward systems have emerged as a popular strategy in the cryptocurrency industry to promote user engagement and control token distribution. While they offer potential benefits, such as increased user participation and reduced exploitation, they also present challenges related to complexity, transparency, and the potential for undesirable user behaviors. For these systems to be effective, projects must design them with clear objectives, ensure transparency in their implementation, and remain adaptable to user feedback and evolving market conditions. Future research should focus on developing frameworks for evaluating the effectiveness of these systems and exploring best practices for their design and implementation.
Many thanks to our sponsor Panxora who helped us prepare this research report.
References
-
Al-Chami, J., & Clark, J. (2025). Quest Love: Do Blockchain Points Build Loyalty or Just Feed the Bots? arXiv preprint. (arxiv.org)
-
Axios. (2024). Earning “free money” in crypto has gotten convoluted. (axios.com)
-
Keyring Pro. (n.d.). The Ultimate Airdrop Guide: Strategies for Different Types. (keyring.app)
-
Crypto.com Research. (2024). Points Farming – Development, Significance and Controversies. (crypto.com)
-
LinkedIn. (n.d.). Controversies and Challenges of Points-Based Rewards in Crypto Projects. (linkedin.com)
-
Galaxy. (n.d.). Crypto Points Programs. (galaxy.com)
-
GoldRush. (n.d.). Understanding Crypto Points and Their Role in Airdrops. (goldrush.dev)
-
Gate. (n.d.). A Deep Dive into the Points Ecosystem – A New Paradigm for User Incentives in PointFi. (gate.com)
-
BTCWires. (n.d.). The Ultimate Guide to Crypto Points: How to Find, Farm, and Profit from the New Airdrop Meta. (btcwires.com)
-
Staking Circle. (n.d.). Research: Crypto Point Programs. (stakingcircle.com)
-
CoinMarketCap. (n.d.). Crypto Points Farming: Pointless or Worth It? (coinmarketcap.com)
-
ChainCatcher. (n.d.). The points system implies airdrops, why do new projects like to “PUA” users to earn points? (chaincatcher.com)
Be the first to comment