Currency Reserves: Management, Evolution, and the Integration of Cryptocurrencies

Abstract

Currency reserves represent an essential pillar of national economic stability and international financial engagement. Held by central banks, these strategic assets serve multifaceted objectives, including the maintenance of monetary stability, facilitation of global trade, and provision of a crucial buffer against economic crises. Historically, the composition of these reserves has been anchored in traditional assets such as gold and a select basket of major foreign currencies. However, the rapidly evolving global financial landscape, characterized by technological advancements and shifts in geopolitical dynamics, has spurred a re-evaluation of established reserve management paradigms. The advent of cryptocurrencies, particularly Bitcoin, introduces a novel and increasingly debated dimension to the traditionally conservative domain of reserve asset management. This comprehensive report meticulously examines the foundational purposes and intricate management principles governing currency reserves, delves into the characteristics of conventional reserve assets, and rigorously scrutinizes the established criteria for their selection. Furthermore, it critically assesses the profound challenges and potential implications arising from the contemplation of unconventional assets, such as cryptocurrencies, within national reserve portfolios. The cautious and measured stance adopted by the Swiss National Bank (SNB) regarding the integration of Bitcoin into its reserves serves as a salient case study, illustrating the complex interplay of financial prudence, regulatory considerations, and innovative financial instruments.

Many thanks to our sponsor Panxora who helped us prepare this research report.

1. Introduction

Currency reserves are the bedrock upon which a nation’s financial resilience and international economic standing are built. These strategically accumulated and managed assets, primarily held by a country’s central bank, are instrumental in underpinning the domestic currency’s value, lubricating the gears of international commerce, and safeguarding overall economic stability. The meticulous composition, judicious management, and optimal deployment of these reserves are paramount to a nation’s enduring economic health and its inherent capacity to navigate and respond effectively to unforeseen financial crises or external economic shocks. In recent years, the exponential growth and increasing mainstream adoption of cryptocurrencies have catalyzed profound discussions within central banking circles and academic institutions regarding their potential, albeit contentious, inclusion in national reserve portfolios. This report embarks on an exhaustive exploration of the historical and contemporary roles and intricate management frameworks of currency reserves, dissects the rigorous criteria applied for the selection of suitable reserve assets, and meticulously analyzes the far-reaching implications and profound challenges inherent in incorporating unconventional assets, such as the leading cryptocurrency, Bitcoin, into these vital national holdings.

Many thanks to our sponsor Panxora who helped us prepare this research report.

2. The Purpose of Currency Reserves

Currency reserves fulfil a spectrum of critical functions that are indispensable for a nation’s economic sovereignty and global financial integration. These functions extend beyond mere asset accumulation, embodying strategic tools for macroeconomic management.

2.1 Exchange Rate Stability

One of the primary and most visible functions of currency reserves is to enable central banks to manage and influence their domestic currency’s exchange rate. This is achieved through direct intervention in foreign exchange markets, where the central bank buys or sells foreign currency against the domestic currency. The objective is to ensure that the exchange rate remains within predefined or desired bands, thereby mitigating excessive volatility that could prove detrimental to the national economy. For instance, a rapid appreciation of the domestic currency can erode the competitiveness of a nation’s exports, making its goods and services more expensive abroad, potentially leading to a decline in export volumes and domestic economic slowdown. Conversely, an uncontrolled depreciation can escalate import costs, fueling inflation and increasing the burden of foreign debt servicing. Central bank interventions can be ‘sterilized’ or ‘unsterilized’. Sterilized interventions involve offsetting the monetary impact of foreign exchange operations by open market operations in the domestic bond market, thus preventing changes in the domestic money supply. Unsterilized interventions, on the other hand, directly impact the domestic money supply. The Swiss National Bank (SNB) offers a compelling example of such intervention, having historically and extensively intervened in the foreign exchange market, particularly between 2009 and 2015, to counteract the perceived overvaluation of the Swiss franc (CHF). The SNB famously set a minimum exchange rate of CHF 1.20 per euro in September 2011, defending it vigorously with massive foreign exchange purchases to protect the competitiveness of Swiss exports and curb deflationary pressures. While this cap was eventually abandoned in January 2015, the episode underscored the SNB’s commitment to exchange rate management using its substantial foreign currency reserves.

2.2 Balance of Payments Support

Reserves are quintessential for facilitating the smooth settlement of a country’s international transactions, encompassing the entire spectrum of its balance of payments. The balance of payments, a comprehensive record of all economic transactions between residents of a country and the rest of the world over a period, comprises two main accounts: the current account (tracking goods, services, income, and transfers) and the capital and financial account (tracking capital transfers and investment flows). When a country runs a current account deficit – meaning it imports more than it exports, or its foreign income is less than its payments abroad – it must finance this deficit, typically through capital inflows or by drawing down its currency reserves. Reserves provide the requisite liquidity to cover trade deficits, service foreign debt obligations, and absorb sudden capital outflows, thereby preserving a stable balance of payments position and preventing a foreign exchange crisis. Countries like Thailand, Indonesia, and South Korea during the 1997-98 Asian Financial Crisis faced severe balance of payments crises due to dwindling reserves, underscoring their critical role as a financial safety net.

2.3 Confidence and Creditworthiness

A robust and prudently managed reserve position significantly enhances a country’s international creditworthiness and fosters confidence among global investors, creditors, and trading partners. A substantial reserve buffer signals a nation’s capacity to honour its external financial commitments, service its foreign debt, and withstand external shocks without resorting to disruptive policy measures. This perception of financial strength and stability typically translates into more favourable borrowing terms in international capital markets, reduced risk premiums on sovereign debt, and an increased attractiveness for foreign direct investment (FDI). International credit rating agencies (e.g., S&P, Moody’s, Fitch) meticulously evaluate a country’s reserve adequacy as a key determinant of its sovereign credit rating. A higher rating reduces a country’s cost of borrowing, which can free up resources for domestic investment and development. Moreover, it reinforces trust in the central bank’s ability to maintain price stability and manage the economy effectively, contributing to overall macroeconomic stability.

2.4 Crisis Management and Precautionary Tool

Beyond day-to-day macroeconomic management, currency reserves serve as an indispensable precautionary tool, providing a critical buffer against unforeseen external shocks or domestic financial crises. These shocks can include sudden stops in capital inflows, large-scale capital flight, commodity price collapses, or severe geopolitical disruptions. During periods of acute financial stress, reserves can be rapidly deployed to provide liquidity to the banking system, stabilize financial markets, and prevent systemic collapse. For instance, during the 2008 global financial crisis, central banks across the globe utilized their reserves, often through currency swap lines with the US Federal Reserve, to ensure adequate dollar liquidity in their financial systems. A strong reserve position can deter speculative attacks on a currency and provide policymakers with valuable time and flexibility to implement necessary structural reforms or macroeconomic adjustments without exacerbating the crisis. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) often assesses reserve adequacy against metrics such as import cover (typically 3-6 months), short-term debt cover, and broad money (M2) cover, recognizing their role as a last resort financial firewall.

2.5 Monetary Policy Tool (Indirectly)

While not their primary function, currency reserves can indirectly support domestic monetary policy objectives. For instance, central banks might sell foreign exchange reserves to mop up excess liquidity from the domestic market (if the proceeds are not sterilized), thereby tightening monetary conditions. Conversely, purchasing foreign exchange can inject liquidity. More broadly, the confidence derived from ample reserves provides the central bank with greater autonomy and credibility in setting interest rates and managing the domestic money supply to achieve its inflation targets and growth objectives, shielding it from external pressures that might otherwise force it to prioritize exchange rate stability over domestic monetary conditions.

Many thanks to our sponsor Panxora who helped us prepare this research report.

3. Traditional Reserve Assets

For centuries, the composition of currency reserves has evolved, but certain assets have consistently retained their status as foundational components due to their inherent characteristics and widely accepted value.

3.1 Gold

Gold has historically occupied a unique and prominent position as a reserve asset, primarily due to its intrinsic value, universal acceptance, and a long-standing reputation as a reliable store of wealth, particularly during times of economic and political uncertainty. For much of the 20th century, the international monetary system was anchored by the gold standard, where national currencies were directly convertible into a fixed quantity of gold. Although the Bretton Woods system, which was a modified gold exchange standard, effectively ended in 1971, gold has retained its allure for central banks. Its appeal lies in several key attributes: it provides a tangible hedge against inflation and currency devaluation, offers diversification benefits against fluctuations in financial markets, and crucially, carries no counterparty risk, meaning its value is not dependent on the creditworthiness of any government or financial institution. This makes it a favoured asset during periods of geopolitical tension or systemic financial instability. Major central banks, including the U.S. Federal Reserve, the European Central Bank, the Deutsche Bundesbank, the Bank of France, and the Bank of Italy, maintain substantial gold holdings. More recently, emerging market economies like China, Russia, and India have significantly increased their gold reserves as part of diversification strategies. The Swiss National Bank, too, held significant gold reserves, which historically formed a substantial portion of its balance sheet. However, following a controversial public debate and a national referendum, the SNB sold a substantial portion of its gold reserves between 2000 and 2005, diversifying its portfolio predominantly into foreign currencies. This move was partly driven by a desire to modernize its reserve management and reduce its exposure to a single asset class. Public sentiment regarding gold reserves remains strong in Switzerland, evidenced by the 2014 ‘Save Our Swiss Gold’ initiative, which, though ultimately rejected, sought to mandate that the SNB hold at least 20% of its assets in gold and prohibit further sales.

3.2 Foreign Currencies

Holding foreign currencies constitutes the largest and most liquid component of modern central bank reserves. These holdings primarily comprise currencies of major, stable economies with deep and liquid financial markets, such as the U.S. dollar (USD), the euro (EUR), the Japanese yen (JPY), the British pound (GBP), and increasingly, the Chinese yuan (CNY). The U.S. dollar, in particular, has maintained its status as the world’s dominant reserve currency due to the size and depth of U.S. financial markets, the stability of its legal and political system, and its widespread use in international trade and finance (e.g., invoicing and settlement of commodities like oil). Holding foreign currencies allows central banks to actively engage in international trade, finance, and investment, settle cross-border transactions, and intervene in foreign exchange markets effectively. The primary advantages of these currencies as reserve assets include their high liquidity, ease of convertibility, established regulatory frameworks, and relatively low transaction costs in vast, global markets. The decision to hold a particular foreign currency is influenced by a combination of factors including its stability, its role in international trade, the depth of its financial markets, and its correlation with other assets in the reserve portfolio.

3.3 Special Drawing Rights (SDRs)

Special Drawing Rights (SDRs) are an international reserve asset created by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) in 1969 to supplement existing official reserves of member countries. They are not a currency themselves, nor are they a claim on the IMF; rather, they are a potential claim on the freely usable currencies of IMF member countries. The value of an SDR is determined by a basket of five major international currencies: the U.S. dollar, the euro, the Chinese yuan, the Japanese yen, and the British pound. IMF members can exchange SDRs among themselves for these freely usable hard currencies, particularly in times of balance of payments need. SDRs play a more limited, albeit symbolic, role in global reserve management compared to gold and foreign currencies. Their primary function is to provide liquidity in the international monetary system and to support member countries facing financial difficulties, rather than serving as a primary asset for direct market intervention. The IMF periodically allocates SDRs to its members, providing them with unconditional liquidity without increasing their debt.

3.4 Other Traditional Assets

Beyond gold, major foreign currencies, and SDRs, central banks diversify their reserve portfolios with other highly liquid and low-risk financial instruments. These typically include:

• Government Bonds: Sovereign debt instruments, particularly those issued by countries with strong credit ratings (e.g., U.S. Treasuries, German Bunds, Japanese Government Bonds), are a cornerstone of reserve portfolios. They offer safety, liquidity, and a modest return, serving as a primary vehicle for holding foreign currency reserves. Their maturity structure is carefully managed to balance liquidity needs with yield optimization.
• Agency Bonds: Debt issued by government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) or quasi-governmental agencies (e.g., Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in the U.S.) can also be included. These typically offer slightly higher yields than sovereign bonds while still maintaining a high level of credit quality.
• Highly-Rated Corporate Bonds: A smaller portion of reserves might be invested in bonds issued by financially sound, highly-rated corporations. This typically involves investment-grade corporate debt, providing a marginal yield pickup over government securities but with a slightly higher credit risk.
• Bank Deposits: Short-term deposits with highly-rated commercial banks in reserve currency countries provide immediate liquidity, though they typically offer minimal returns.

The strategic allocation across these assets is a complex exercise, aiming to balance the core objectives of safety, liquidity, and return within a given risk tolerance framework. Central banks constantly monitor market conditions, economic outlooks, and geopolitical developments to adjust their portfolio composition.

Many thanks to our sponsor Panxora who helped us prepare this research report.

4. Criteria for Selecting Reserve Assets

Central banks adhere to a stringent set of criteria when selecting and managing their reserve assets, reflecting their overarching mandate of maintaining financial stability and minimizing risk. These criteria are not mutually exclusive but rather interconnected, requiring a careful balancing act.

4.1 Liquidity

Liquidity is arguably the most critical criterion for reserve assets. It refers to the ease and speed with which an asset can be converted into cash or another desired asset without causing a significant price impact or loss of value. Central banks must be able to access their funds promptly and efficiently to intervene in foreign exchange markets, meet balance of payments obligations, or provide emergency liquidity during a crisis. High liquidity is characterized by deep and active markets, narrow bid-ask spreads, and the ability to execute large transactions without unduly affecting market prices. For example, U.S. Treasury securities and major currency exchange markets are highly liquid, allowing central banks to buy or sell billions of dollars with minimal price disruption. Conversely, assets with limited trading volumes or niche markets are deemed illiquid and are generally unsuitable for core reserve holdings, even if they offer attractive returns. Central banks typically hold a significant portion of their reserves in highly liquid, short-term instruments to ensure immediate access to funds.

4.2 Safety

Safety, also referred to as capital preservation or credit risk minimization, is paramount. Reserve assets must be low-risk, minimizing the probability of loss due to default by the issuer, market fluctuations, or geopolitical events. This mandates that central banks primarily favour assets issued by sovereign governments with impeccable credit ratings (e.g., AAA), stable political systems, and robust legal frameworks. The focus is on preserving the capital value of the reserves, even at the expense of higher returns. This involves rigorous credit risk assessment, counterparty risk management, and diversification across multiple issuers and jurisdictions to avoid concentration risk. Central banks also consider legal and operational risks, ensuring that assets are held in secure, well-regulated environments with clear legal recourse. The safety objective often leads central banks to shun assets perceived as speculative or subject to significant price swings, as such volatility directly undermines the stability mandate of reserve management.

4.3 Return

While safety and liquidity are pre-eminent, central banks also consider the potential return on reserve assets. The aim is to generate a reasonable return that helps offset the costs of holding reserves (e.g., storage, management fees) and preserves their purchasing power over time, particularly in an inflationary environment. However, this objective is secondary to safety and liquidity. Central banks typically adopt a conservative investment strategy, focusing on capital preservation rather than aggressive yield-seeking. This often means investing in fixed-income securities with various maturities, employing strategies like laddering to manage interest rate risk and ensure a steady stream of income. The challenge in recent years, particularly in economies with negative interest rates (like Switzerland for a period), has been to generate positive returns without compromising on safety or liquidity. For instance, the SNB’s large foreign currency holdings, particularly in euros and yen, were subjected to negative interest rates, imposing a cost rather than yielding a return on a portion of its reserves. Balancing these factors requires sophisticated portfolio management techniques, including duration management and strategic asset allocation, tailored to the central bank’s specific mandates and risk tolerance.

4.4 Diversification

Modern reserve management principles heavily emphasize diversification across various asset classes, currencies, and geographical regions. The objective of diversification, rooted in modern portfolio theory, is to reduce the overall risk of the reserve portfolio by spreading investments across assets that are not perfectly correlated. This means that if one asset or currency performs poorly, the impact on the overall portfolio is mitigated by the stable or positive performance of others. For example, a central bank might hold a mix of U.S. dollars, euros, yen, and gold, along with various sovereign bonds and short-term deposits. This strategy helps protect the portfolio from idiosyncratic risks associated with a single currency or economy, as well as broader market shocks. Diversification also extends to the choice of custodians and financial institutions, minimizing counterparty risk. The optimal diversification strategy is dynamic, adjusting to changing global economic conditions, geopolitical risks, and market trends to ensure the portfolio remains resilient and aligned with the central bank’s objectives.

4.5 Sustainability and ESG Considerations (Emerging Trend)

An increasingly discussed, though not yet universally adopted, criterion for reserve management is the incorporation of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) factors. Some central banks are beginning to consider the sustainability impact of their investments, aligning their reserve management with broader national sustainability goals. This could involve, for instance, investing in green bonds, avoiding investments in industries with high carbon footprints, or favouring companies with strong governance practices. While still nascent, this trend reflects a growing recognition of the interconnectedness of financial stability with broader societal and environmental well-being. However, the primary objectives of safety, liquidity, and return remain paramount, and ESG considerations are typically integrated without compromising these core principles.

Many thanks to our sponsor Panxora who helped us prepare this research report.

5. Challenges with Unconventional Assets

The discussion surrounding the inclusion of unconventional assets, particularly cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, in national reserve portfolios is fraught with significant challenges that central banks, traditionally conservative institutions, find difficult to reconcile with their core mandates.

5.1 Volatility

Perhaps the most prominent and immediate challenge posed by cryptocurrencies is their extreme price volatility. Unlike traditional reserve assets such as sovereign bonds or major fiat currencies, which exhibit relatively stable price movements, cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin are notorious for their drastic and unpredictable price swings. Bitcoin, for instance, has experienced multiple instances of 50-80% peak-to-trough declines within short periods, followed by equally dramatic surges. This inherent unpredictability makes them exceptionally risky additions to reserve portfolios, whose primary purpose is to preserve value and provide stability. A central bank holding a significant portion of its reserves in highly volatile assets could see the value of its holdings fluctuate wildly, undermining its ability to manage exchange rates, provide balance of payments support, or instil confidence. Such volatility could trigger systemic risks if a central bank were forced to sell significant crypto holdings during a market downturn, potentially exacerbating the price collapse and creating financial instability.

5.2 Liquidity Concerns

While major cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin are traded globally, their market liquidity, especially during periods of stress or significant selling pressure, can be a major concern for central banks. Although the daily trading volume of Bitcoin can be substantial, the depth of its markets, particularly for large institutional trades, may not always match that of traditional sovereign bond or foreign exchange markets. Executing large block trades of Bitcoin could lead to significant slippage (the difference between the expected price of a trade and the price at which the trade is actually executed), eroding the value of the transaction. Furthermore, the liquidity can be fragmented across numerous exchanges, some of which may have questionable regulatory oversight or be prone to operational issues. This variability in liquidity can pose considerable challenges for central banks requiring immediate and substantial access to funds for intervention or crisis management, as they may struggle to convert large crypto holdings into usable fiat currency without causing significant market disruption or incurring substantial losses.

5.3 Regulatory and Security Issues

The regulatory landscape surrounding cryptocurrencies remains fragmented, evolving, and largely unsettled across jurisdictions. This lack of a clear, comprehensive, and globally harmonized regulatory framework introduces significant legal and operational uncertainties for central banks. Key concerns include:

• Regulatory Uncertainty: Different countries classify and regulate cryptocurrencies in varied ways (as commodities, securities, properties, or even currencies), leading to legal ambiguities regarding ownership, transfer, taxation, and their treatment in the event of insolvency. This fragmented approach complicates cross-border transactions and potential international cooperation.
• Security Risks: The decentralized and pseudonymous nature of many cryptocurrencies, while offering certain benefits, also presents unique security challenges. Central banks would need robust cybersecurity infrastructure to protect private keys, which are essential for accessing and controlling cryptocurrency holdings. Risks include hacking attempts, phishing, malware, and insider threats. Secure custody solutions (e.g., multi-signature cold storage wallets) are paramount but add layers of operational complexity and cost.
• Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Counter-Terrorist Financing (CTF) Compliance: The pseudonymity inherent in cryptocurrency transactions raises concerns about their potential use for illicit financing. Central banks would need to establish stringent AML/CTF protocols, requiring robust ‘know your customer’ (KYC) procedures for any intermediaries involved in managing these assets, which can be challenging in a decentralized environment.
• Market Manipulation: The relatively nascent and less regulated nature of cryptocurrency markets makes them potentially more susceptible to market manipulation (e.g., ‘wash trading’, ‘pump-and-dump’ schemes) compared to highly regulated traditional financial markets. This poses a significant risk to the integrity and value of central bank holdings.

5.4 Energy Consumption

Another significant challenge, particularly for proof-of-work (PoW) cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, is their substantial energy consumption. The mining process, which secures the network and validates transactions, requires immense computational power and, consequently, large amounts of electricity. This raises environmental concerns regarding carbon footprint and sustainability, making it a contentious asset from an Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) perspective. For central banks that are increasingly incorporating ESG considerations into their investment frameworks and are under public scrutiny regarding their environmental impact, holding such energy-intensive assets could be inconsistent with their broader policy goals and public image.

5.5 Lack of Intrinsic Value and Fundamental Backing

Unlike traditional reserve assets such as gold, which possesses industrial and jewellery demand, or fiat currencies, which are backed by the taxing power and economic output of a sovereign nation, cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin often lack a clear, widely accepted concept of intrinsic value beyond what the market is willing to pay. Their value is primarily derived from network effects, adoption, and speculative demand rather than underlying economic productivity or a direct claim on real assets. This makes their valuation highly subjective and prone to sentiment-driven bubbles and crashes, contrasting sharply with the stable and fundamentally-backed nature expected of reserve assets.

5.6 Scalability and Interoperability

While advancements are being made, some major cryptocurrencies still face scalability issues, meaning their networks can process a limited number of transactions per second, potentially leading to congestion and high transaction fees during peak demand. For central banks needing to execute large, time-sensitive transactions, this could be problematic. Furthermore, integrating novel blockchain-based assets into existing, highly centralized traditional financial infrastructure presents significant interoperability challenges, requiring substantial technological upgrades and new protocols.

Many thanks to our sponsor Panxora who helped us prepare this research report.

6. The Swiss National Bank’s Approach

The Swiss National Bank (SNB), renowned for its conservative and stability-oriented approach to monetary policy and reserve management, has consistently expressed a cautious, if not sceptical, stance regarding the integration of cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin into its national reserves. This position is deeply rooted in its core mandates and historical operating principles.

6.1 SNB’s Core Mandate and Reserve Management Philosophy

The SNB’s primary statutory objective, as defined by the Swiss Federal Act on the National Bank, is to ensure price stability, while taking due account of economic developments. Furthermore, it is tasked with contributing to the stability of the financial system. These mandates dictate a highly risk-averse approach to reserve management, prioritizing safety and liquidity above all else. The SNB manages its foreign exchange reserves, which are predominantly held in major currencies such as the euro, U.S. dollar, British pound, and Japanese yen, with diversification across sovereign bonds, equities (a unique aspect for a central bank), and cash. Their investment strategy is characterized by prudence, a long-term horizon, and a commitment to maintaining capital preservation. The SNB’s experience with significant foreign exchange interventions, particularly during the period of the euro-franc minimum exchange rate, has further solidified its focus on holding highly liquid and stable assets to ensure its operational capacity.

6.2 Official Statements and Rationale for Caution

SNB Chairman Martin Schlegel has publicly articulated the central bank’s reservations about integrating Bitcoin into its reserves. His concerns echo many of the challenges outlined above, specifically highlighting the ‘high energy consumption’ and ‘volatility’ associated with cryptocurrencies. In various public statements, SNB officials have consistently reiterated that Bitcoin does not currently meet the stringent criteria for reserve assets. Their reasoning can be summarized as follows:

• Volatility: The extreme price fluctuations of Bitcoin are incompatible with the SNB’s imperative to maintain stable reserve values for macroeconomic management. Any significant holding in Bitcoin would introduce an unacceptable level of risk and uncertainty into the SNB’s balance sheet, potentially undermining its credibility and operational effectiveness.
• Lack of Fundamental Value/Yield: Unlike sovereign bonds that yield interest or equities that represent a claim on future earnings, Bitcoin does not generate an intrinsic return or possess a universally accepted fundamental valuation model beyond speculative demand. For a central bank managing substantial public funds, this is a significant drawback.
• Energy Consumption: The SNB, like an increasing number of global financial institutions, is sensitive to environmental considerations. The substantial energy footprint of Bitcoin’s proof-of-work mechanism runs counter to growing sustainability concerns and potentially broader national environmental objectives.
• Regulatory Framework: The absence of a mature, globally harmonized, and robust regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies poses significant governance, legal, and operational risks that the SNB is unwilling to assume for its reserves.
• Mandate Focus: The SNB’s primary focus is on price stability and supporting the Swiss economy through traditional monetary policy tools. Cryptocurrencies are not perceived as tools that directly enhance or support these core objectives; rather, they introduce complexities and risks that could distract from the central bank’s main responsibilities.

6.3 Historical Context and Public Debate on SNB’s Reserves

The SNB’s management of its reserves has been a recurrent subject of public and political debate in Switzerland, a nation known for its direct democracy. This historical context illuminates the SNB’s sensitivity to public opinion and its adherence to established practices.

• Gold Sales (2000-2005): Following a period where Switzerland’s gold reserves were considered excessively large and unproductive, and after a national referendum on the issue, the SNB sold approximately 1,550 tonnes of gold between 2000 and 2005. This move, aimed at diversifying assets and generating more flexible liquidity, was controversial and led to subsequent calls for a constitutional amendment to restrict future gold sales.
• ‘Save Our Swiss Gold’ Initiative (2014): In 2014, a popular initiative sought to amend the constitution to require the SNB to hold at least 20% of its assets in gold, store it entirely within Switzerland, and prohibit future sales. While the initiative was ultimately rejected by voters, it demonstrated a significant segment of the population’s desire for conservative, tangible reserve assets and skepticism towards abstract financial instruments.
• Sovereign Money Initiative (2018): Another popular initiative in 2018 aimed to give the SNB the sole power to create money, taking this power away from commercial banks. While distinct from reserve management, this initiative also highlighted public interest in the fundamental nature of money and the central bank’s role, contributing to an environment where innovation in monetary assets is viewed with both curiosity and caution.

These historical precedents suggest that any significant shift in SNB’s reserve policy, particularly towards unconventional assets, would likely face intense public scrutiny and require broad societal consensus, which is currently lacking for cryptocurrencies.

6.4 Distinction from Other Digital Asset Engagements

It is crucial to differentiate the SNB’s stance on private cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin from its engagement with other forms of digital assets. The SNB has been an active participant in exploring Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) and wholesale digital tokens. For instance, the SNB has collaborated with the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) on ‘Project Helvetia,’ exploring the settlement of tokenized securities with wholesale CBDC. This indicates an openness to technological innovation in financial infrastructure, but specifically within a controlled, centralized, and regulated framework, starkly different from the decentralized and unregulated nature of Bitcoin. The SNB’s interest lies in leveraging DLT for efficiency and security in interbank settlements, not in holding volatile, speculative digital assets as part of its core reserves.

Many thanks to our sponsor Panxora who helped us prepare this research report.

7. The Swiss Bitcoin Initiative

Against the backdrop of the SNB’s conservative stance and Switzerland’s tradition of direct democracy, a significant popular movement emerged in December 2024: the ‘Swiss Bitcoin Initiative.’ This initiative seeks to profoundly alter the fundamental nature of Switzerland’s monetary reserves by amending the Swiss Federal Constitution to explicitly mandate that the Swiss National Bank hold Bitcoin alongside gold as a component of its monetary reserves. This audacious proposal aims to position Switzerland at the vanguard of global Bitcoin adoption, bolstering its financial sovereignty and potentially reshaping its economic future.

7.1 Proponents’ Arguments and Rationale

The proponents of the Swiss Bitcoin Initiative articulate a multifaceted argument rooted in principles of financial independence, economic resilience, and forward-looking innovation:

• Financial Sovereignty and Neutrality: Switzerland prides itself on its historical neutrality. Proponents argue that holding Bitcoin, a decentralized asset not controlled by any single nation or central bank, would enhance Switzerland’s financial sovereignty and independence from the monetary policies and geopolitical influences of other major powers, particularly those issuing reserve currencies like the U.S. dollar or the euro. They view Bitcoin as a truly neutral reserve asset, akin to gold, immune to political manipulation or confiscation by foreign governments.
• Hedge Against Inflation and Fiat Debasement: Bitcoin’s fixed supply cap (21 million coins) is often touted as its most compelling feature, positioning it as a deflationary asset or a superior hedge against inflation compared to fiat currencies, which can be perpetually printed by central banks. Proponents argue that in an era of unprecedented quantitative easing and rising public debt, holding Bitcoin would safeguard the purchasing power of Switzerland’s reserves against the long-term devaluation of traditional fiat currencies.
• Strengthening the Economy and Safeguarding Independence: By embracing Bitcoin, the initiative’s supporters believe Switzerland can attract significant capital and talent from the burgeoning global cryptocurrency industry, fostering innovation and creating new economic opportunities within the country. They argue that a proactive stance on Bitcoin would solidify Switzerland’s reputation as a leading financial hub and a pioneer in financial technology, thereby strengthening its economy and ensuring its long-term independence.
• Diversification and Non-Correlation: While the SNB views Bitcoin as highly correlated with tech stocks, proponents argue that over a very long-term horizon, Bitcoin could potentially offer diversification benefits against traditional financial assets and currencies, especially in scenarios of systemic crisis within the traditional financial system. They view it as a hedge against ‘black swan’ events affecting fiat currencies.
• Digital Gold Narrative: Bitcoin is frequently referred to as ‘digital gold’ due to its scarcity, decentralization, and perceived store-of-value properties. The initiative implicitly draws a parallel to Switzerland’s historical affinity for gold, suggesting Bitcoin as its modern, digital equivalent, suitable for a forward-thinking nation.

7.2 Mechanics of the Initiative in Swiss Direct Democracy

The Swiss Bitcoin Initiative follows the established process for popular initiatives in Switzerland’s system of direct democracy. For a popular initiative to succeed and be put to a national vote, its proponents must collect at least 100,000 valid signatures from eligible voters within an 18-month period. If the required number of signatures is collected and validated, the initiative proceeds to a parliamentary debate, where the Federal Council (the executive) and Parliament formulate a recommendation (to accept, reject, or propose a counter-proposal). Ultimately, the initiative is put to a nationwide popular vote, where it requires a double majority: a majority of the popular vote and a majority of the cantons (states) to pass. This stringent process ensures that any fundamental change to the constitution reflects broad societal consensus.

7.3 Challenges and Counterarguments to the Initiative

Despite the enthusiasm of its proponents, the Swiss Bitcoin Initiative faces substantial challenges and significant counterarguments, particularly from the SNB and much of the mainstream financial establishment:

• SNB’s Mandate Conflict: The most powerful counterargument comes from the SNB itself. As stated by Chairman Schlegel, the SNB’s core mandate is price stability and financial system stability. The inherent volatility and speculative nature of Bitcoin fundamentally conflict with these objectives. Mandating the SNB to hold a volatile asset like Bitcoin would undermine its ability to fulfil its constitutional responsibilities and could expose the Swiss economy to unprecedented financial risks.
• Independence of the Central Bank: The initiative is perceived by some as an attempt to curtail the operational independence of the SNB. Central banks typically require independence from political interference to make sound, long-term monetary policy decisions. Mandating specific asset classes in the constitution could set a dangerous precedent, opening the door to further political directives on reserve management, potentially compromising the SNB’s ability to act prudently and flexibly in changing economic circumstances.
• Economic Instability: Forcing the SNB to acquire Bitcoin, potentially in large quantities, could introduce massive volatility into Switzerland’s national balance sheet. A sudden and sharp decline in Bitcoin’s value could significantly impair the SNB’s equity, potentially leading to losses that would need to be covered by the Swiss taxpayer or compromise the SNB’s ability to distribute profits to the cantons. This could have destabilizing effects on the broader Swiss economy and financial system.
• Practical Implementation Challenges: Beyond the theoretical arguments, there are immense practical challenges in integrating Bitcoin into a central bank’s reserve management. These include developing secure custody solutions for private keys at a national scale, establishing robust risk management frameworks for a highly volatile and unregulated asset, and training personnel with specialized blockchain expertise. The energy consumption aspect also remains a significant hurdle, potentially inviting criticism.
• Comparison to Past Initiatives: Switzerland has a history of popular initiatives challenging the SNB’s policies, such as the 2014 ‘Save Our Swiss Gold’ initiative and the 2018 ‘Sovereign Money Initiative’. While these initiatives reflected public concern over monetary policy, they were ultimately rejected, largely due to the public’s trust in the SNB’s expertise and the recognition of the complexities of central banking. The Bitcoin Initiative faces a similar uphill battle against established economic principles and the SNB’s strong reputation.

Ultimately, the Swiss Bitcoin Initiative represents a fascinating intersection of technological disruption, monetary policy, and direct democracy. Its outcome will not only impact Switzerland but will also be closely watched globally as an indicator of public and political appetite for integrating unconventional digital assets into national financial architecture.

Many thanks to our sponsor Panxora who helped us prepare this research report.

8. Global Perspectives on Cryptocurrency Reserves

While the Swiss National Bank maintains a cautious stance, a few sovereign entities have ventured into the realm of cryptocurrency holdings, albeit driven by unique economic, political, or developmental circumstances rather than conventional reserve management strategies.

8.1 El Salvador

El Salvador stands as the most prominent and pioneering case study in national Bitcoin adoption. In September 2021, it became the first country in the world to adopt Bitcoin as legal tender, alongside the U.S. dollar. This decision, championed by President Nayib Bukele, was driven by several stated objectives: facilitating cheaper remittances (a significant portion of El Salvador’s GDP), attracting foreign investment, boosting tourism, and promoting financial inclusion for its unbanked population. Concurrently with making Bitcoin legal tender, the Salvadoran government began acquiring Bitcoin for its national treasury (often referred to as ‘reserves’ in public discourse, though its classification as traditional reserves by international bodies is debated). These purchases have been made periodically, often ‘buying the dip’ during market corrections. The government also launched the ‘Bitcoin Bond’ or ‘Volcano Bond,’ an innovative financial instrument aimed at raising funds for Bitcoin City, a tax-free zone powered by geothermal energy for Bitcoin mining.

Implications and Outcomes: El Salvador’s bold experiment has yielded mixed results. On one hand, it has garnered global attention, attracted a niche segment of ‘Bitcoin tourists,’ and reduced remittance fees for some users. On the other hand, the extreme volatility of Bitcoin has meant that the value of El Salvador’s national holdings has fluctuated wildly, at times incurring significant unrealized losses. The IMF and the World Bank have repeatedly voiced concerns about the risks to financial stability, consumer protection, and the potential for money laundering, urging El Salvador to reconsider its Bitcoin strategy. The adoption has also faced domestic opposition regarding transparency, economic stability, and the high costs of implementation. El Salvador’s case is unique, driven by a specific national strategy rather than typical central bank reserve management best practices.

8.2 Ukraine

Ukraine’s engagement with cryptocurrencies emerged largely out of necessity during the Russian invasion in February 2022. Facing an immediate need for financial resources and leveraging the global crypto community’s support, the Ukrainian government and various NGOs rapidly established crypto donation channels. Millions of dollars’ worth of Bitcoin, Ethereum, and other cryptocurrencies were received, providing critical funds for military and humanitarian aid. This was a pragmatic move to circumvent traditional banking channels that might have been disrupted or slow. In March 2022, Ukraine passed a law creating a legal framework for the cryptocurrency industry, providing judicial protection for the right to own virtual assets and clarifying the legal status of crypto within the country. While Ukraine has accepted and utilized cryptocurrency donations, this should be differentiated from holding cryptocurrencies as strategic, long-term reserve assets. The primary goal was immediate liquidity and funding during a crisis, rather than strategic asset accumulation for macroeconomic stability.

8.3 Bhutan

Bhutan, a small Himalayan kingdom, has quietly emerged as a significant player in the Bitcoin mining landscape. Through its sovereign investment arm, Druk Holding and Investments (DHI), Bhutan has been running a large-scale, state-backed Bitcoin mining operation, leveraging its abundant and cheap hydroelectric power resources. This clandestine operation was reportedly initiated as early as 2014-2017 but only came to light in 2023 following the bankruptcy filings of crypto lenders Celsius and BlockFi, to whom DHI had exposure. Estimates suggest that Bhutan had accumulated substantial Bitcoin holdings, with reports indicating figures around $750 million, representing a significant portion (reportedly 28%) of the country’s GDP.

Rationale and Implications: Bhutan’s strategy appears to be an opportunistic move to monetize its natural energy resources and accumulate a non-traditional asset through a low-cost production method. Unlike other nations, Bhutan is ‘mining’ Bitcoin rather than primarily ‘buying’ it with existing foreign exchange. This approach minimizes direct foreign exchange outlay and leverages a domestic competitive advantage (cheap hydropower). While the scale of its holdings is notable, this is again distinct from conventional central bank reserve management. DHI is a commercial entity operating a mining venture, and its Bitcoin holdings are more akin to a sovereign wealth fund’s alternative investments rather than a central bank’s liquidity-focused reserves. Nevertheless, it represents a state-level accumulation of Bitcoin, driven by a unique economic opportunity.

8.4 Iran

Iran’s interest in cryptocurrencies is primarily driven by its need to circumvent stringent international sanctions, which severely restrict its access to the global financial system and its ability to conduct international trade using traditional fiat currencies. Facing a shortage of foreign exchange, Iran has increasingly embraced Bitcoin mining as a means to generate hard currency. In a significant development, Iran announced pending regulations requiring licensed Bitcoin miners within the country to sell their generated Bitcoin directly to the Central Bank of Iran. The Central Bank would then utilize these Bitcoin holdings to pay for imports, effectively using cryptocurrency as a bridge to bypass sanctions and facilitate international trade.

Implications: Iran’s approach is a strategic response to geopolitical isolation. It highlights how cryptocurrencies can be leveraged as alternative payment rails and reserve assets in extreme circumstances where traditional financial access is denied. However, this model is born out of necessity rather than a perceived superiority of Bitcoin as a reserve asset under normal circumstances. It also carries significant risks of exacerbating money laundering and sanctions evasion concerns, drawing international scrutiny.

8.5 Other Nations (Briefly)

While El Salvador, Ukraine, Bhutan, and Iran represent the most significant instances of state-level engagement with cryptocurrencies, other nations have shown nascent interest or exploratory gestures. The Central African Republic (CAR) followed El Salvador in adopting Bitcoin as legal tender in 2022, though its implementation has been fraught with challenges and has largely failed to gain traction due to a lack of necessary infrastructure and public understanding. Nations like Venezuela have launched their own state-backed cryptocurrencies (e.g., the Petro), primarily as attempts to stabilize their collapsing economies or evade sanctions, but these have largely been unsuccessful. These cases demonstrate that while some sovereign entities are experimenting with cryptocurrencies, their motivations are often idiosyncratic and driven by specific geopolitical, economic, or developmental pressures, rather than a broad, mainstream shift in central bank reserve management philosophy.

Many thanks to our sponsor Panxora who helped us prepare this research report.

9. Implications for Reserve Management

The potential, albeit controversial, inclusion of cryptocurrencies in national reserve portfolios raises a multitude of profound considerations that would necessitate a radical rethinking of established reserve management practices. These implications span strategic, operational, and policy dimensions.

9.1 Diversification Revisited

The traditional argument for diversification in reserve management seeks to reduce overall portfolio risk by combining assets with low or negative correlation. Proponents of cryptocurrency inclusion argue that Bitcoin, being a non-sovereign, decentralized asset, could offer true diversification against fiat currency risks and traditional financial market downturns. However, empirical evidence to date suggests that Bitcoin’s price movements often correlate with those of speculative technology stocks or other risk assets, particularly during periods of market stress. In ‘risk-off’ environments, Bitcoin has often declined alongside equities, diminishing its appeal as a safe-haven or uncorrelated asset. A central bank would need to conduct extensive empirical analysis to determine if the purported diversification benefits genuinely outweigh the inherent volatility and other risks. The optimal allocation would also need careful consideration, likely remaining a very small percentage of the total portfolio due to its risk profile.

9.2 Policy and Regulatory Framework

Integrating cryptocurrencies into reserves would necessitate the development of entirely new, comprehensive, and robust policy and regulatory frameworks. This is arguably the most significant hurdle. Key areas requiring meticulous attention include:

• Legal Classification: A clear legal classification of cryptocurrencies (e.g., currency, commodity, security, property) at the national level is fundamental, impacting their regulatory treatment, taxation, and legal status in reserve portfolios.
• Custody Solutions and Risk Management: Central banks would need to establish ultra-secure custody solutions for private keys, which control access to cryptocurrency holdings. This involves complex cryptographic security measures, multi-signature wallets, air-gapped cold storage, and rigorous internal controls. Beyond technological security, a comprehensive risk management framework would be needed to address market risk (volatility), operational risk (cybersecurity breaches, human error), counterparty risk (if using third-party custodians or exchanges), and compliance risk.
• Accounting and Reporting Standards: New accounting and reporting standards would be required to accurately value, record, and report cryptocurrency holdings on a central bank’s balance sheet, considering their volatility and unique characteristics. International accounting bodies would need to provide clear guidance.
• Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Counter-Terrorist Financing (CTF) Compliance: Central banks would face immense pressure to ensure that any cryptocurrency transactions within their reserve management adhere to stringent AML/CTF regulations, particularly given the pseudonymous nature of many crypto assets. This would require enhanced due diligence and potentially sophisticated blockchain analytics tools.
• International Cooperation: Given the global nature of cryptocurrency markets, international cooperation among central banks, financial regulators, and standard-setting bodies (e.g., FSB, BIS, IMF) would be crucial to develop consistent regulatory approaches, share best practices, and address cross-border risks.

9.3 Technological Infrastructure

Managing cryptocurrency reserves demands a sophisticated and resilient technological infrastructure, far beyond what is typically required for traditional assets. This includes:

• Secure Storage and Custody: Implementation of state-of-the-art cold storage solutions, potentially involving geographically distributed multi-signature schemes and hardware security modules (HSMs), to protect private keys from online and offline threats. The architecture would need to be resilient against various attack vectors.
• Integration with Existing Systems: Seamless integration of blockchain-related data and transaction capabilities into existing treasury management systems, accounting platforms, and risk management frameworks. This would involve significant IT development and potentially new software solutions.
• Real-time Monitoring and Analytics: Development or acquisition of tools for real-time monitoring of cryptocurrency market movements, liquidity, and network activity. Blockchain analytics tools would be essential for tracing transactions, ensuring compliance, and detecting illicit activity.
• Cybersecurity Expertise: Recruitment and training of specialized personnel with deep expertise in blockchain technology, cryptography, and cybersecurity to manage the new infrastructure and mitigate novel risks. This represents a significant investment in human capital.

9.4 Market Impact and Systemic Risk

If a major central bank were to acquire significant cryptocurrency holdings, its actions could have a substantial impact on the relatively less liquid and more sentiment-driven crypto markets. Large purchases could inflate prices, while significant sales could trigger sharp declines, potentially creating market instability. This could expose the central bank to accusations of market manipulation or create self-inflicted losses. Furthermore, widespread adoption of cryptocurrencies in central bank reserves without adequate regulation and risk management could introduce new systemic risks to the global financial system, particularly if their inherent volatility or security vulnerabilities were to materialize on a large scale. The interconnectedness of crypto markets with traditional finance could lead to contagion effects during periods of stress.

9.5 Public Perception and Trust

Central banks operate on public trust. Introducing a volatile and often misunderstood asset class like cryptocurrencies into national reserves could erode public confidence in the central bank’s prudence and its ability to maintain monetary stability. A significant loss in the value of these holdings could lead to public outcry and political pressure, potentially undermining the central bank’s independence and credibility. Managing this public perception, particularly in nations with strong traditions of financial conservatism like Switzerland, would be a critical challenge.

Many thanks to our sponsor Panxora who helped us prepare this research report.

10. Conclusion

Currency reserves remain an indispensable cornerstone for maintaining national economic stability, safeguarding financial sovereignty, and facilitating the seamless flow of international trade and finance. For centuries, these vital buffers have been constructed predominantly from traditional, highly stable assets such as physical gold, a universally recognized store of value, and a select basket of major foreign fiat currencies, prized for their liquidity and backing by robust national economies. The meticulous management of these reserves adheres to stringent principles, prioritizing safety and liquidity above all else, with a secondary consideration for reasonable returns and strategic diversification.

However, the nascent but rapidly evolving landscape of digital finance, spearheaded by the emergence of cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, presents both intriguing opportunities and formidable challenges to the conventionally conservative domain of central bank reserve management. While proponents highlight potential benefits such as diversification, a hedge against inflation, and enhanced financial sovereignty, the inherent characteristics of most cryptocurrencies, notably their extreme price volatility, often limited market depth for institutional-scale transactions, and the still-evolving, fragmented regulatory and security frameworks, fundamentally conflict with the core objectives and risk appetite of central banks.

The cautious and discerning approach adopted by the Swiss National Bank (SNB) serves as a compelling case study illustrating this fundamental tension. Rooted in its unwavering mandate for price stability and financial system integrity, the SNB has consistently expressed deep reservations about integrating highly volatile and energy-intensive assets like Bitcoin into its strategically managed reserves. Its stance underscores a commitment to prudence and a reluctance to expose the Swiss economy to the untested risks associated with unconventional digital assets, especially when traditional alternatives adequately fulfil the central bank’s operational requirements.

Despite the SNB’s measured perspective, global precedents, though often driven by unique circumstances (e.g., El Salvador’s legal tender adoption, Ukraine’s crisis-driven donations, Bhutan’s energy-led mining, and Iran’s sanctions circumvention), indicate a burgeoning exploration of cryptocurrencies at the sovereign level. These isolated instances, however, typically deviate significantly from established central bank reserve management best practices, highlighting that their motivations are often idiosyncratic rather than universally applicable models for prudential reserve accumulation.

Looking forward, the potential inclusion of cryptocurrencies in central bank reserves necessitates not merely a re-evaluation of investment portfolios but a comprehensive overhaul of policy, regulatory, and technological infrastructure. Central banks would need to meticulously address issues of secure custody, robust risk management, transparent accounting, and stringent compliance with anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing standards. The debate also extends to the broader implications for market stability and public trust, two pillars upon which central bank credibility rests.

In conclusion, while the digital revolution continues to reshape the financial world, the fundamental role of currency reserves remains unchanged: to safeguard a nation’s economic stability. The trajectory of central bank engagement with unconventional assets will likely be characterized by continued research, cautious experimentation in controlled environments (such as wholesale CBDC projects), and a gradual evolution of regulatory frameworks. Any widespread integration of cryptocurrencies into core reserve portfolios by major central banks appears, for the foreseeable future, to be highly improbable without significant maturation of the cryptocurrency market, substantial reduction in volatility, and the establishment of robust, globally harmonized regulatory and security architectures. The enduring principles of safety, liquidity, and capital preservation will continue to dictate the composition of national currency reserves, adapting incrementally to innovation rather than embracing it at the cost of stability.

Many thanks to our sponsor Panxora who helped us prepare this research report.

References

• Swiss National Bank. (n.d.). Responsibilities and goals of the SNB. Retrieved from (snb.ch)
• Swiss Bitcoin Initiative. (n.d.). Bitcoin Initiative. Retrieved from (initiativebtc.ch)
• Ishtiaque, A. (2025, January 3). Swiss Bitcoin Initiative: Proposal Seeks to Add Bitcoin to National Reserves. Brave New Coin. Retrieved from (bravenewcoin.com)
• Wikipedia contributors. (2025, August 10). Bitcoin and politics. In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved from (en.wikipedia.org)
• Wikipedia contributors. (2025, August 10). Swiss sovereign-money initiative. In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved from (en.wikipedia.org)
• Wikipedia contributors. (2025, August 10). Save our Swiss Gold. In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved from (en.wikipedia.org)
• Wikipedia contributors. (2025, August 10). Bergier commission. In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved from (en.wikipedia.org)
• Wikipedia contributors. (2025, August 10). Swiss franc. In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved from (en.wikipedia.org)
• Wikipedia contributors. (2025, August 10). Swiss National Bank. In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved from (en.wikipedia.org)
• International Monetary Fund. (n.d.). Special Drawing Rights (SDRs). Retrieved from (imf.org)
• Bank for International Settlements. (n.d.). Project Helvetia. Retrieved from (bis.org)
• IMF. (2022, February 1). El Salvador: Staff Report for the 2021 Article IV Consultation. Retrieved from (imf.org)
• Wall Street Journal. (2023, April 26). Bhutan’s Secret Bitcoin Mining Operation Revealed. Retrieved from (wsj.com)
• Reuters. (2020, October 28). Iran central bank to buy bitcoin from miners for imports. Retrieved from (reuters.com)