Research Report: State Assets in Developing Nations – Navigating Governance, Exploitation, and the Digital Frontier

Many thanks to our sponsor Panxora who helped us prepare this research report.

Abstract

This comprehensive research report undertakes an in-depth examination of the intricate concept of state assets within developing nations, with a particular focus on the foundational legal and governance frameworks designed to ensure their transparent, accountable, and equitable management. It meticulously explores a range of historical instances of asset exploitation, critically analysing the multifaceted ways in which such mismanagement has undermined national sovereignty, stifled long-term economic development, and compromised resource control. The report then transitions to a contemporary challenge, scrutinising the emergent risks presented by the misuse or deliberate mismanagement of advanced technologies, specifically blockchain. It posits that inadequately regulated or poorly implemented blockchain initiatives could inadvertently, or intentionally, facilitate the illicit transfer or legitimisation of control over critical national resources, further exacerbating existing vulnerabilities. Ultimately, this analysis underscores the profound and enduring implications these issues hold for the fiscal health, political autonomy, and socio-economic trajectory of developing states.

Many thanks to our sponsor Panxora who helped us prepare this research report.

1. Introduction

State assets, a broad and vital category encompassing everything from sub-surface mineral wealth and strategic energy reserves to expansive public infrastructure and substantial financial reserves, constitute the bedrock of national wealth, economic stability, and sovereign autonomy, particularly for nations in the developing world. The prudent, transparent, and equitable management of these assets is not merely an administrative prerogative but a fundamental determinant of a nation’s capacity for sustainable development, poverty reduction, and the provision of essential public services to its citizenry. Conversely, their mismanagement, whether through corruption, inefficiency, or deliberate exploitation, can precipitate a cascade of detrimental outcomes, including profound economic loss, the erosion of national control over strategic resources, exacerbated socio-economic inequalities, and ultimately, a hindered path to comprehensive national development.

In recent years, the global technological landscape has undergone a profound transformation, with the advent of distributed ledger technologies (DLTs), most notably blockchain, presenting both unprecedented opportunities and novel challenges in the realm of state asset management. While blockchain promises enhanced transparency, immutability, and efficiency in record-keeping and transaction validation, its application, especially in contexts characterised by weak governance or limited technical capacity, carries significant risks. There is a tangible concern that its complex, often opaque nature, if improperly governed, could become a new vector for asset exploitation, facilitating illicit transfers or legitimising questionable claims over invaluable national resources under the guise of technological advancement.

This report embarks on a detailed exploration of these critical dynamics. It begins by meticulously defining state assets in the context of developing nations, elaborating on their multifaceted importance and the inherent challenges that complicate their effective stewardship. It then delves into the evolution and efficacy of legal and governance frameworks, examining both international standards and national adaptations designed to foster transparency and accountability. A significant portion of the analysis is dedicated to cataloguing and dissecting historical instances of asset exploitation, providing concrete examples and elucidating the systemic failures that permitted them. Finally, the report critically assesses the dual nature of blockchain technology in this domain, highlighting its potential benefits alongside the substantial risks posed by its mismanagement, particularly concerning national sovereignty, long-term economic prosperity, and the enduring control over a nation’s intrinsic wealth. This multi-faceted inquiry aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the stakes involved and to inform strategies for safeguarding these crucial national endowments.

Many thanks to our sponsor Panxora who helped us prepare this research report.

2. State Assets in Developing Nations

2.1 Definition, Categorisation, and Multifaceted Importance

State assets, fundamentally, represent all resources, tangible and intangible, owned and controlled by a government on behalf of its citizens. Their definition and categorisation are crucial for effective management and accountability. In developing nations, these assets are not merely economic instruments but are deeply intertwined with national identity, sovereignty, and the future trajectory of their populations.

Categorisation of State Assets:

1. Natural Resources: This constitutes perhaps the most critical category for many developing nations. It includes sub-surface minerals (e.g., oil, natural gas, gold, diamonds, copper, cobalt, rare earth elements), vast forest reserves, arable land, freshwater sources (rivers, lakes, aquifers), and marine resources (fisheries, offshore energy potential). The proper valuation, extraction, and revenue management of these resources are paramount, as they often represent the primary source of national income and foreign exchange.
2. Infrastructure: This category encompasses the foundational physical systems essential for economic activity and societal well-being. It includes national and regional transportation networks (roads, railways, ports, airports), energy generation and distribution systems (power plants, grids), water supply and sanitation infrastructure, and telecommunications networks. These assets require significant capital investment, continuous maintenance, and strategic planning to support growth.
3. Financial Assets and Reserves: Governments hold various financial assets, including foreign exchange reserves, investments in sovereign wealth funds, shares in state-owned enterprises (SOEs), public debt holdings, and cash balances in treasury accounts. These assets provide fiscal stability, act as a buffer against external shocks, and can be strategically deployed for national development initiatives.
4. State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs): These are commercial entities established and owned, wholly or partially, by the government, operating in strategic sectors such as banking, utilities, manufacturing, mining, and telecommunications. While they can serve developmental goals, their governance, efficiency, and profitability are often subjects of intense scrutiny.
5. Intangible Assets: This category, often overlooked, includes intellectual property rights (patents, copyrights held by state research institutions), public data (census data, geographic information systems), and national branding. While not physically tangible, these assets can hold significant economic and strategic value.
6. Cultural and Historical Assets: National museums, historical sites, heritage landmarks, and national art collections, while not directly revenue-generating, are invaluable repositories of national identity, culture, and history. Their preservation and management are critical for societal cohesion and educational enrichment.

Importance of State Assets in Developing Nations:

• Economic Development and Poverty Reduction: Revenues from natural resources and dividends from SOEs can fund public investments in education, healthcare, and infrastructure, directly contributing to human development and poverty alleviation.
• National Sovereignty and Security: Control over strategic natural resources (e.g., energy, vital minerals) and critical infrastructure (e.g., ports, telecommunications) is fundamental to a nation’s ability to chart its own course, free from undue external influence. It underpins national security and strategic autonomy.
• Fiscal Stability and Resilience: Strong foreign exchange reserves provide macroeconomic stability, allowing governments to manage balance of payments, stabilise currencies, and respond to economic shocks. Prudent management of SOEs can also contribute to the national budget.
• Provision of Public Services: Infrastructure assets are directly responsible for the delivery of essential services like electricity, water, sanitation, and transportation, which are crucial for quality of life and business operations.
• Social Equity and Intergenerational Justice: The equitable distribution of benefits derived from state assets, particularly non-renewable resources, is vital for social cohesion. Managing these assets sustainably ensures that future generations also benefit from their national endowments.

2.2 Enduring and Evolving Challenges in Management

Developing nations often grapple with a complex array of challenges that significantly impede the effective and transparent management of state assets. These challenges are often systemic, deeply rooted in historical contexts, and exacerbated by contemporary pressures.

Key Challenges Include:

1. Institutional Weakness and Capacity Gaps: Many developing countries suffer from nascent or fragile institutions responsible for asset management. This often translates to:
   • Limited Technical Expertise: A shortage of skilled personnel in areas such as resource economics, financial modelling, engineering, legal drafting, and contract negotiation. This can lead to unfavourable contracts with multinational corporations or poor investment decisions.
   • Inadequate Infrastructure for Monitoring: A lack of robust data management systems, remote sensing capabilities, and real-time monitoring tools makes it difficult to track asset performance, resource extraction volumes, or infrastructure condition effectively.
   • Weak Regulatory Bodies: Regulatory agencies may lack the independence, funding, or authority to enforce laws, monitor compliance, and impose penalties, creating an environment ripe for exploitation.
2. Corruption and Governance Deficits: This is arguably the most pervasive challenge. State assets represent lucrative targets for illicit enrichment, manifesting in various forms:
   • Bribery and Patronage: Awarding contracts, concessions, or licences in exchange for kickbacks or political favours.
   • Rent-Seeking Behaviour: Individuals or groups manipulating the regulatory or political environment to extract disproportionate economic benefits from state assets without contributing corresponding value.
   • Asset Stripping: The systematic dismantling and sale of state-owned enterprises or other assets for personal gain, often below market value, particularly during privatisation processes.
   • Illicit Financial Flows (IFFs): Revenues generated from state assets, especially natural resources, are often siphoned off through illicit means, including trade mis-invoicing, transfer pricing manipulation, and anonymous shell companies, depriving the state of legitimate tax revenue.
3. Political Instability and Interference: Frequent changes in government, civil unrest, or the dominance of narrow political elites can severely disrupt long-term asset management strategies. Political interference can lead to:
   • Short-Termism: Prioritising immediate political gains over sustainable, long-term asset value maximisation.
   • Nepotism and Favouritism: Appointing unqualified individuals to key management positions in SOEs or regulatory bodies based on political loyalty rather than merit.
   • Policy Incoherence: Inconsistent policy frameworks and frequent legislative changes create uncertainty for investors and hinder effective planning.
4. External Pressures and Asymmetries of Power: Developing nations often negotiate with powerful multinational corporations or international financial institutions from a position of relative weakness. This can result in:
   • Unfavourable Contracts: Mining or oil concessions that disproportionately favour foreign investors, leaving limited benefits for the host country.
   • Debt Traps: Accumulating unsustainable debt, sometimes collateralised by future resource revenues, which compromises national autonomy.
   • Complex Legal and Financial Structures: Sophisticated corporate structures and legal instruments used by foreign entities can make it challenging for developing nations to understand and monitor their operations or to levy appropriate taxes.
5. Market Volatility: For countries heavily reliant on commodity exports (e.g., oil, minerals), global price fluctuations can create significant fiscal instability, making long-term planning for asset management challenging. This ‘resource curse’ can also disincentivise diversification of the economy.
6. Lack of Public Participation and Oversight: Limited avenues for civil society engagement, journalistic scrutiny, and parliamentary oversight can create an environment where mismanagement goes unchecked, reducing accountability.

Addressing these challenges requires a multi-pronged approach encompassing robust legal reforms, institutional strengthening, anti-corruption measures, capacity building, and fostering a culture of transparency and accountability.

Many thanks to our sponsor Panxora who helped us prepare this research report.

3. Legal and Governance Frameworks for Transparent Management

The transparent and accountable management of state assets necessitates robust legal and governance frameworks that operate at both international and national levels. These frameworks are designed to mitigate risks of exploitation, promote efficiency, and ensure that asset benefits accrue to the broader populace.

3.1 International Standards and Best Practices: A Global Imperative

International organisations and multilateral initiatives have played a pivotal role in shaping normative standards and promoting best practices for state asset management. These frameworks serve as vital benchmarks for developing nations seeking to enhance their own governance structures.

1. OECD Guidelines on Corporate Governance of State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs): The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) provides comprehensive guidelines aimed at promoting good corporate governance in SOEs. These principles cover areas such as:

   • Rationale for State Ownership: Encouraging governments to clarify the objectives of state ownership and ensure that SOEs operate with a clear commercial or public service mandate.
   • State as an Owner: Emphasising the need for an active, informed, and transparent ownership policy, often through a centralised ownership entity (e.g., a dedicated agency or ministry) to exercise ownership rights professionally and effectively.
   • SOE Boards of Directors: Promoting the appointment of independent and competent board members with clear responsibilities, ensuring that boards are capable of providing strategic guidance and oversight without undue political interference.
   • Transparency and Disclosure: Mandating high standards of financial and non-financial disclosure, including annual reports, audits, and performance metrics, to allow for public scrutiny and market discipline.
   • Stakeholder Relations: Encouraging SOEs to respect the rights of various stakeholders, including employees, creditors, and local communities.
   • Integrity and Ethics: Establishing robust anti-corruption policies, codes of conduct, and whistle-blower protection mechanisms.
     The OECD’s Africa Capital Markets Report 2025 specifically highlights the adoption of such frameworks, citing Morocco’s Framework Law No. 50-21 of 2021, which established the National Agency for the Strategic Management of State Holdings (ANGSPE), centralising oversight of public shareholdings. Similarly, Namibia’s Public Enterprises Governance Act of 2019 created the Public Enterprises Governance Council to approve governance frameworks and performance agreements for public enterprises, demonstrating a commitment to international best practices (oecd.org).

2. Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI): EITI is a global standard that promotes the open and accountable management of oil, gas, and mineral resources. It requires implementing countries to disclose information along the extractive industry value chain, from how extraction rights are awarded, to how revenues make their way through the government, and how they benefit the public. This includes:

   • Contract Transparency: Disclosure of contracts and licences.
   • Revenue Reporting: Reconciliation of payments made by companies and revenues received by governments.
   • Beneficial Ownership Transparency: Disclosure of the true owners of companies operating in the extractive sector to combat corruption and illicit financial flows.

3. United Nations Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC): As the only legally binding universal anti-corruption instrument, UNCAC provides a comprehensive framework for preventing and criminalising corruption. It includes provisions for asset recovery, international cooperation in law enforcement, and technical assistance. Article 5, for instance, mandates states to establish and promote effective practices aimed at preventing corruption, while Chapter V focuses on asset recovery, vital for reclaiming illicitly acquired state assets.

4. World Bank and International Monetary Fund (IMF) Governance Initiatives: Both institutions provide policy advice, technical assistance, and financial support to developing nations to improve public financial management, strengthen anti-corruption frameworks, and enhance the governance of SOEs. Their programmes often include conditionalities aimed at improving transparency and accountability in asset management.

3.2 National Legal Frameworks: Tailoring Global Standards to Local Contexts

Translating international standards into effective national legal frameworks requires careful consideration of local political, economic, and social contexts. Developing nations have adopted diverse legislative and regulatory approaches to manage state assets, with varying degrees of success.

1. Public Financial Management (PFM) Acts: These laws typically govern budgeting, accounting, auditing, and financial reporting within the public sector. Effective PFM acts ensure that:

   • Budgetary Discipline: All revenues from state assets are accounted for and expenditures are authorised through transparent budgetary processes.
   • Financial Reporting Standards: Uniform accounting standards are applied across government entities and SOEs, facilitating clear financial oversight.
   • Independent Audits: Supreme Audit Institutions (SAIs) are empowered to conduct independent audits of government accounts and SOEs, reporting findings to the legislature and the public.

2. Legislation for State-Owned Enterprises (SOE Acts): Many countries have specific laws governing the establishment, operation, and oversight of SOEs. For example, Tanzania’s Public Corporations Act of 1992 defines the roles and responsibilities of key authorities involved in state ownership, including mechanisms for performance monitoring, financial reporting, and government oversight. These acts typically:

   • Clarify Mandates: Define the commercial or public service objectives of SOEs.
   • Establish Governance Structures: Outline the composition and responsibilities of SOE boards, their relationship with parent ministries, and the role of oversight bodies.
   • Require Performance Agreements: Mandate performance targets and reporting against these targets.
   • Regulate Privatisation: Provide legal frameworks for the sale or divestment of SOEs, often requiring parliamentary approval and transparent bidding processes.

3. Resource Sector Specific Laws (e.g., Mining Acts, Petroleum Acts): Given the strategic importance of natural resources, specific legislation governs exploration, extraction, licensing, environmental protection, revenue sharing, and local content requirements. These laws are critical for ensuring that resource wealth contributes to national development and is not siphoned off.

4. Anti-Corruption Legislation: Comprehensive anti-corruption laws, including those establishing independent anti-corruption agencies, whistle-blower protection, and asset declaration requirements for public officials, are fundamental to deterring and prosecuting illicit enrichment from state assets.

5. Procurement Laws: Public procurement, often a significant avenue for corruption, is governed by laws that mandate competitive bidding, transparency in contract awards, and mechanisms for redress.

Challenges in Implementation: Even with robust legal frameworks, developing nations often face significant challenges in implementation, including:

• Weak Enforcement: Laws may exist on paper but are not effectively enforced due to judicial corruption, lack of political will, or insufficient resources for regulatory bodies.
• Legal Loopholes: Complex and rapidly evolving illicit schemes often exploit ambiguities or gaps in existing legislation.
• Political Interference: Legislative processes can be undermined by powerful vested interests seeking to create exemptions or weaken oversight mechanisms.
• Lack of Public Awareness: Limited public understanding of legal rights and accountability mechanisms can hinder citizen participation in oversight.

Strengthening national frameworks therefore requires not only legislative reform but also consistent political commitment, institutional capacity building, and active citizen engagement to ensure that the laws are truly effective in safeguarding state assets.

Many thanks to our sponsor Panxora who helped us prepare this research report.

4. Historical Examples of Asset Exploitation

The history of developing nations is replete with instances where state assets, particularly natural resources and public enterprises, have been subject to various forms of exploitation, often with devastating long-term consequences for national development, economic stability, and social equity. These historical patterns provide crucial lessons for contemporary governance challenges.

4.1 Resource Mismanagement and Corruption: The ‘Resource Curse’

Many resource-rich developing countries have paradoxically experienced slower economic growth, greater inequality, and higher levels of corruption – a phenomenon often termed the ‘resource curse’ or ‘paradox of plenty.’ This curse manifests through several channels:

1. Macroeconomic Instability (Dutch Disease): A surge in revenue from natural resource exports can lead to an appreciation of the national currency, making other exports less competitive and discouraging diversification of the economy. This over-reliance on a single sector makes the economy vulnerable to global commodity price fluctuations.

   • Example: Nigeria’s Oil Wealth: Despite being Africa’s largest oil producer, Nigeria has struggled for decades with pervasive corruption in its oil sector. Billions of dollars in oil revenues have been siphoned off through illicit deals, fuel subsidy scams, and mismanagement. The lack of transparent accounting and weak oversight mechanisms have allowed a culture of impunity to thrive, diverting funds that could have been used for critical infrastructure, education, and healthcare. The country’s over-reliance on oil has also led to underdevelopment in other sectors, contributing to widespread poverty and inequality, even amidst vast natural wealth.

2. Corruption in Concession and Licensing: The process of granting exploration and extraction rights for lucrative resources is highly vulnerable to corruption. Officials may accept bribes in exchange for awarding contracts to favoured companies, often under unfavourable terms for the state.

   • Example: Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) Mining Deals: The DRC, incredibly rich in minerals like copper, cobalt, diamonds, and gold, has a long and tragic history of resource exploitation. Numerous reports from organisations like Global Witness have detailed how opaque mining contracts, often signed during periods of political instability or conflict, have consistently undervalued mineral deposits, depriving the state of billions of dollars in potential revenue. These deals frequently involved powerful political figures and foreign companies, with little transparency or accountability, perpetuating conflict and poverty in resource-rich regions.

3. Grand Corruption and State Capture: In extreme cases, state assets become instruments for ‘state capture,’ where powerful private interests systematically influence government policy and institutions to their own benefit. This can involve corrupting legislative processes, judicial systems, and regulatory bodies.

   • Example: Angolan ‘Kleptocracy’: Angola’s vast oil reserves have enriched a narrow elite connected to the ruling party, at the expense of the wider population. Reports have detailed how state resources were funnelled into private hands through opaque contracts, embezzlement from state oil company Sonangol, and the use of shell companies. The ‘Luanda Leaks’ investigation, for instance, exposed how Isabel dos Santos, daughter of the former president, allegedly amassed a huge fortune through preferential access to state contracts and assets, illustrating how state power can be leveraged for personal enrichment on an industrial scale.

4.2 Asset Stripping and Corrupt Privatization

Privatisation of state-owned enterprises (SOEs), intended to improve efficiency and reduce fiscal burdens, has frequently been marred by corruption and asset stripping in developing nations, leading to the loss of national control over critical industries and resources.

• Post-Soviet Privatisation in Eastern Europe and Central Asia: Following the collapse of the Soviet Union, many former communist states embarked on rapid mass privatisation programmes. While intended to transition to market economies, these processes were often plagued by a lack of transparent regulatory frameworks, weak institutions, and widespread corruption. State assets, including strategic industries, utilities, and land, were often sold off to political insiders, oligarchs, or foreign entities at rock-bottom prices, leading to the concentration of wealth in a few hands, job losses, and a loss of public trust. The Russian ‘loans-for-shares’ scheme in the mid-1990s is a prime example, where valuable state assets were effectively transferred to politically connected businessmen for trivial sums.

• African Privatisation Experiences: In several African countries, structural adjustment programmes mandated by international financial institutions often included extensive privatisation of SOEs. While some privatisations yielded positive results, many were criticised for their lack of transparency, insufficient regulatory oversight, and the sale of public assets to politically connected individuals or foreign companies, often without competitive bidding. This sometimes resulted in monopolies replacing public entities, limited improvements in service delivery, and the loss of state control over vital sectors such as telecommunications, banking, and utilities. For instance, concerns were raised in Zambia regarding the opaque nature and perceived unfairness of some copper mine privatisations, which did not always translate into expected benefits for the national economy.

4.3 Illicit Resource Extraction and Land Grabs

Beyond formal corruption, large-scale illicit activities contribute significantly to asset exploitation, particularly in sectors with weak governance.

1. Illegal Mining and Logging: These activities deplete natural resources without contributing to national revenue, causing severe environmental degradation, and often funding armed conflict.

   • Example: Artisanal Mining in Conflict Zones: In regions like eastern DRC or parts of Colombia, illegal artisanal mining of gold, coltan, and other minerals is often controlled by armed groups or criminal networks. The resources are smuggled out of the country, bypassing official channels and tax revenues, while the associated violence, human rights abuses, and severe environmental damage (deforestation, water contamination) devastate local communities. The profits from these illicit activities further fuel instability.

2. Large-Scale Land Grabs: The acquisition of vast tracts of land, often belonging to local communities or smallholder farmers, by foreign investors or domestic elites for agricultural, mining, or infrastructure projects, sometimes without adequate compensation or due process.

   • Example: Agricultural Land Acquisitions in Southeast Asia and Africa: Driven by global food and energy price volatility, there has been a surge in large-scale land acquisitions (often termed ‘land grabs’) in countries like Ethiopia, Cambodia, and Madagascar. These deals, often negotiated opaquely between governments and foreign corporations, frequently displace indigenous populations and local farmers, disrupt traditional livelihoods, and lead to environmental degradation. Weak land tenure systems and limited legal protections for customary land rights make communities vulnerable to such exploitation, where communal assets are privatised for the benefit of a few.

These historical examples underscore a critical lesson: robust legal frameworks, transparent governance, strong independent institutions, and active citizen oversight are indispensable safeguards against the exploitation of state assets. Without these, even abundant national wealth can become a source of poverty, conflict, and lost development opportunities.

Many thanks to our sponsor Panxora who helped us prepare this research report.

5. Blockchain Technology and State Assets: Promise and Peril

Blockchain technology, a revolutionary advancement in digital record-keeping, presents a complex duality for developing nations: a potent tool for enhancing transparency and efficiency in asset management, yet simultaneously a new vector for potential exploitation if mismanaged or co-opted. Understanding both its mechanics and its implications is crucial.

5.1 Overview of Blockchain Technology: The Foundations of Immutability

At its core, blockchain is a decentralised, distributed ledger technology (DLT) that enables the secure, transparent, and tamper-proof recording of transactions. Unlike traditional centralised databases, where a single entity controls and verifies information, a blockchain relies on a network of participants to collectively maintain and validate the ledger.

Key Characteristics:

1. Decentralisation: No single authority controls the entire network. Instead, data is replicated and shared across multiple nodes (computers) in the network. This eliminates single points of failure and makes the system more resilient to censorship or manipulation.
2. Immutability: Once a transaction (or ‘block’ of transactions) is added to the blockchain, it cannot be altered or deleted. Each new block contains a cryptographic hash of the previous block, creating an unbreakable chain. This characteristic is foundational for trust and auditability.
3. Transparency (Pseudonymous): While individual identities may be pseudonymous (represented by cryptographic addresses), all transactions on a public blockchain are typically visible to everyone on the network. This allows for open scrutiny of transaction history.
4. Consensus Mechanisms: Participants in the network agree on the validity of transactions through various consensus algorithms (e.g., Proof of Work, Proof of Stake). This ensures that only legitimate transactions are added to the ledger.
5. Smart Contracts: Self-executing contracts with the terms of the agreement directly written into code. They automatically execute predefined actions when certain conditions are met, without the need for intermediaries. This can automate processes and reduce human error or intervention.

5.2 Potential Applications in Asset Management: A Vision of Efficiency and Integrity

The inherent properties of blockchain technology offer transformative potential for improving the management of state assets, particularly in environments plagued by corruption and inefficiency:

1. Land Registries and Property Rights: One of the most promising applications is the creation of immutable and transparent land registries. In many developing nations, land records are often paper-based, fragmented, prone to corruption, and vulnerable to fraud, leading to disputes and undermining property rights. A blockchain-based land registry could:

   • Enhance Security: Provide an unalterable record of ownership, making it extremely difficult to forge titles or claim ownership fraudulently.
   • Improve Transparency: Allow public scrutiny of land transactions (while protecting personal data where necessary).
   • Streamline Processes: Automate land transfers and mortgage registrations through smart contracts, reducing bureaucratic hurdles and processing times.
   • Example: Georgia’s Blockchain Land Registry: Since 2016, Georgia has piloted the use of blockchain for land title registration, aiming to make records more secure, transparent, and efficient, though full-scale implementation is still ongoing. Other nations, like Ghana, have also explored similar initiatives.

2. Natural Resource Supply Chain Traceability: For valuable natural resources like minerals, timber, or conflict commodities, blockchain can create a transparent and verifiable chain of custody from extraction to final product. This can:

   • Combat Illicit Trade: Prove the origin of resources, helping to prevent the trade of illegally extracted or conflict minerals.
   • Ensure Ethical Sourcing: Enable consumers and regulators to verify that products are sourced ethically and sustainably.
   • Improve Revenue Collection: Track volumes extracted and exported, facilitating accurate taxation and royalty collection.

3. Public Procurement and Contract Management: Governments can leverage blockchain to record and manage public tenders, bids, and contracts. This could:

   • Increase Transparency: Make the entire procurement process visible and auditable, reducing opportunities for corruption and collusion.
   • Improve Accountability: Ensure that contracts are awarded fairly and that terms are fulfilled, with smart contracts automatically releasing payments upon verification of deliverables.

4. Identity Management and Digital Citizenship: Blockchain can secure digital identities, which are foundational for accessing public services, voting, and interacting with state institutions. Estonia’s ‘e-Estonia’ digital platform, which integrates blockchain (specifically, its Keyless Signature Infrastructure or KSI Blockchain) into government processes for data integrity and security, serves as a global exemplar of a digitally advanced society (brookings.edu). This approach secures everything from medical records to business registrations and even digital voting.

5. Digital Currencies and Treasury Management: Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) or other blockchain-based payment systems can improve the efficiency and security of financial transactions, including inter-government transfers, aid distribution, and tax collection, reducing the scope for graft and increasing fiscal transparency.

5.3 Risks and Mismanagement: A New Frontier for Exploitation

Despite its promise, the implementation of blockchain technology, particularly in environments with weak governance, poses significant risks that could ironically facilitate rather than hinder asset exploitation.

1. Regulatory Vacuum and Legal Uncertainty: The nascent nature of blockchain technology means that legal and regulatory frameworks often lag behind. This creates uncertainty and opportunities for manipulation:

   • Jurisdictional Arbitrage: Illicit actors can exploit differences in national regulations to legitimise assets or conduct transactions in jurisdictions with minimal oversight.
   • Lack of Clear Ownership: The legal status of tokenised assets (digital representations of real-world assets) and the ownership of digital wallets are often unclear, complicating recovery in cases of fraud or theft.

2. Technical Complexity and Implementation Challenges: Blockchain systems are technically intricate and require specialised expertise that may be scarce in developing nations.

   • Vulnerability to Hacks: While the blockchain itself is secure, the interfaces and smart contracts built upon it can have vulnerabilities that hackers can exploit. This was seen in the infamous DAO hack in 2016.
   • Energy Consumption and Scalability: Some blockchain technologies, particularly those using Proof of Work, are energy-intensive, posing environmental concerns and operational costs.
   • Interoperability: Integrating blockchain solutions with existing legacy systems can be technically challenging and costly.

3. ‘Blockchain Washing’ and Lack of True Decentralisation: Some initiatives are marketed as ‘blockchain-based’ to appear innovative and transparent, but may lack true decentralisation or immutability, essentially being centralised databases repackaged with blockchain terminology. This ‘blockchain washing’ can mislead stakeholders and mask underlying inefficiencies or opaque practices.

4. Anonymity for Illicit Activities: While public blockchains offer transparency of transactions, the pseudonymous nature of wallets can make it difficult to identify the real-world beneficial owners, creating avenues for money laundering and illicit financial flows if ‘Know Your Customer’ (KYC) and ‘Anti-Money Laundering’ (AML) regulations are not robustly applied to the on-ramps and off-ramps of the crypto ecosystem.

5. Threats to Monetary Sovereignty and Financial Stability: The adoption of unbacked cryptocurrencies as legal tender or for state-related transactions can undermine a central bank’s control over monetary policy, expose the economy to extreme volatility, and complicate financial regulation.

Case Study: Central African Republic (CAR)’s Crypto Ambitions

The Central African Republic (CAR) provides a stark contemporary example of the profound risks associated with the rushed and opaque adoption of cryptocurrency initiatives. Despite being one of the world’s poorest nations, CAR embraced Bitcoin as legal tender in April 2022 and subsequently launched the ‘Sango Coin’ project.

• The Sango Coin Project: This initiative aimed to attract investment by offering ‘digital citizenship,’ ‘e-residency,’ and the tokenisation of national assets, including land and mineral concessions, in exchange for Sango Coin investments. The premise was to create a ‘crypto hub’ and a ‘Sango City’ where digital and physical assets would merge. However, the project was riddled with issues from its inception:
  • Opaque Implementation: There was a severe lack of transparency regarding the project’s funding, technological architecture, and the details of asset tokenisation. The legislative process for its adoption was rushed, bypassing robust public and parliamentary scrutiny.
  • Constitutional Court Intervention: The CAR’s Constitutional Court ultimately blocked key aspects of the Sango Coin initiative, citing concerns about its legality, particularly its provisions for selling citizenship and national assets without clear constitutional safeguards. This intervention highlighted the significant legal and sovereign implications of such schemes.
  • Risk to National Assets: Plans to tokenise mineral concessions, for example, without clear legal frameworks, robust valuation, and transparent oversight, opened the door to speculative investments, potential money laundering, and the illicit transfer of control over invaluable national resources to unknown entities. The ‘tokenised real-world asset’ concept, while promising, necessitates extremely stringent governance to prevent exploitation (en.wikipedia.org).
  • Monetary and Fiscal Instability: The adoption of unbacked cryptocurrencies as legal tender, alongside the national currency, raised severe concerns from the IMF and regional bodies about monetary stability, financial integrity, and the erosion of central bank control. The lack of infrastructure for widespread crypto adoption further complicated its practical utility for the general population.
• The ‘CAR Meme Coin’ Fiasco: Further compounding concerns, a ‘CAR meme coin’ emerged, distinct from Sango Coin, experiencing technical issues and lacking any clear mechanism for revenue allocation back to the state. Such unverified and speculative digital assets expose citizens to financial risks and can further damage public trust in legitimate digital initiatives.

As Reuters reported, these opaque crypto schemes in CAR raised significant alarm about their potential to endanger state assets by facilitating money laundering and the illicit sale of national resources (reuters.com). This case illustrates a critical lesson: while blockchain offers tools for transparency, the governance surrounding its implementation, including the political will for oversight, legal clarity, and public engagement, ultimately determines whether it becomes a force for good or a new avenue for exploitation. The global trend of countries exploring or adopting cryptocurrencies (e.g., El Salvador with Bitcoin City concept, though its specific implementation differs significantly (en.wikipedia.org)) necessitates a vigilant and cautious approach to protect national sovereignty and public wealth.

Many thanks to our sponsor Panxora who helped us prepare this research report.

6. Implications for National Sovereignty and Economic Development

The effective management, or conversely, the exploitation, of state assets holds profound and far-reaching implications for a nation’s sovereignty, its trajectory of economic development, and its long-term ability to control and sustainably manage its intrinsic resources. These implications are particularly acute for developing nations, which often possess significant resource wealth but struggle with the institutional capacity to protect it.

6.1 Threats to National Sovereignty: Eroding Self-Determination

National sovereignty, defined as the supreme and independent authority of a state within its territory, is directly imperilled when state assets are mismanaged or exploited. The loss of control over critical resources can lead to a gradual but insidious erosion of self-determination.

1. Economic Dependency and External Influence: When a nation’s key state assets – particularly strategic natural resources like oil, gas, or vital minerals – fall under the effective control of foreign entities or are heavily mortgaged against external debt, the government’s ability to make independent policy decisions is severely constrained. Decisions regarding resource extraction, pricing, environmental regulations, or even broader economic policies may be dictated or heavily influenced by external corporate or state interests, rather than national priorities. This can manifest as:

   • Resource Collateralisation: Using future resource revenues as collateral for loans can create a ‘debt trap,’ where a nation’s fiscal policy is dictated by debt servicing, rather than developmental needs, essentially ceding future economic control.
   • Extraterritorial Legal Frameworks: Complex international contracts and arbitration clauses can remove disputes over national assets from domestic legal jurisdiction, subjecting them to international commercial law, which may not always align with national interests or developmental goals.
   • Geopolitical Leverage: Control over a nation’s strategic assets by powerful foreign states or corporations can be used as geopolitical leverage, compromising foreign policy autonomy and diplomatic independence.

2. Weakening of State Institutions: Pervasive corruption in asset management can hollow out state institutions. When resource wealth primarily benefits a small elite, rather than being distributed broadly through transparent state channels, public trust in government erodes. This weakens democratic processes, fosters political instability, and makes the state less capable of exercising its sovereign functions effectively.

3. Loss of Policy Space: Governments in developing nations often face immense pressure from international financial institutions or donor countries to adopt specific economic policies, particularly concerning the privatisation or liberalisation of state assets. While some reforms may be beneficial, externally imposed agendas can reduce a government’s ‘policy space’ – its ability to formulate and implement policies tailored to its unique national context and development stage, rather than adhering to universal prescriptions.

6.2 Economic Development Challenges: Stifled Growth and Inequality

Mismanagement and exploitation of state assets fundamentally undermine the foundational elements necessary for sustained and inclusive economic development.

1. Diverted Resources and Underinvestment: Revenues siphoned off through corruption or illicit financial flows are funds that are not invested in critical public services, infrastructure, or human capital development. This leads to:

   • Poor Public Services: Inadequate funding for education, healthcare, and social safety nets perpetuates poverty and inequality.
   • Infrastructure Deficits: A lack of investment in roads, energy, water, and telecommunications stifles productivity, raises business costs, and hinders economic diversification.
   • Missed Industrialisation Opportunities: Over-reliance on raw material exports (due to the resource curse) often prevents the development of downstream industries, value addition, and job creation in more diversified sectors.

2. Increased Inequality and Social Unrest: When the benefits of state assets are concentrated in the hands of a few through corrupt means, it exacerbates income inequality. This can fuel social resentment, regional disparities, and ultimately lead to civil unrest or conflict, further destabilising the economy and deterring investment.

3. Erosion of Investor Confidence: Corruption and opaque asset management practices create an unpredictable and high-risk business environment. This deters legitimate foreign direct investment (FDI) and encourages ‘fly-by-night’ investors seeking quick profits through illicit means, rather than those committed to long-term sustainable development.

4. Fiscal Instability and Debt Accumulation: Poor management of state enterprises can turn them into fiscal drains, requiring continuous government bailouts. Furthermore, lost revenues from exploited assets necessitate borrowing, contributing to national debt, which consumes a larger share of the national budget in debt servicing, diverting funds from productive investments.

6.3 Resource Control and Environmental Concerns: Intergenerational Betrayal

The exploitation of natural state assets has severe long-term consequences for environmental sustainability and the intergenerational equity of resource control.

1. Environmental Degradation and Climate Change Vulnerability: Illicit and unregulated extraction activities, such as illegal mining, logging, and unsustainable agricultural practices on state lands, cause widespread environmental damage:

   • Deforestation: Destroys biodiversity, accelerates soil erosion, and contributes to climate change through carbon emissions.
   • Water Pollution: Contaminates rivers and groundwater with toxic chemicals (e.g., mercury and cyanide from illegal gold mining), impacting public health and aquatic ecosystems.
   • Habitat Loss: Leads to the extinction of species and disruption of ecological balance.
   • Increased Climate Vulnerability: Environmental degradation often makes communities more vulnerable to the impacts of climate change, such as extreme weather events, droughts, and floods, particularly in developing nations with limited adaptive capacity.

2. Loss of Biodiversity: Many developing nations are custodians of globally significant biodiversity hotspots. Uncontrolled exploitation of forests, wetlands, and marine resources leads to irreversible losses of unique flora and fauna, diminishing natural capital and ecosystem services (e.g., water purification, pollination) that are vital for human well-being.

3. Compromised Intergenerational Equity: Non-renewable resources, once extracted, are gone forever. If their benefits are siphoned off by a corrupt few or used for short-term unsustainable gains, future generations are deprived of their rightful inheritance. Sustainable resource management requires balancing present needs with future generations’ ability to meet their own, ensuring that resource wealth is converted into durable forms of capital (e.g., education, infrastructure, sovereign wealth funds) that continue to generate benefits long after the physical resource is depleted.

4. Community Dispossession and Conflict: Exploitation often leads to the displacement of local communities, destruction of their livelihoods, and environmental injustices. This can ignite or exacerbate local conflicts, especially where traditional land rights or customary resource management systems are ignored or undermined by large-scale commercial interests.

In essence, the mismanagement and exploitation of state assets represent a betrayal of the national interest, directly compromising a nation’s ability to govern itself, develop its economy sustainably, and safeguard its natural heritage for the benefit of all citizens, present and future.

Many thanks to our sponsor Panxora who helped us prepare this research report.

7. Recommendations for Effective Management

Safeguarding state assets in developing nations requires a holistic, multi-pronged strategy that addresses legal, institutional, technical, and social dimensions. This involves strengthening existing frameworks, building new capacities, and responsibly leveraging technological advancements.

7.1 Strengthening Legal and Governance Frameworks

Robust legal and governance frameworks are the bedrock of transparent and accountable asset management. These must be continually reviewed, updated, and rigorously enforced.

1. Enact and Enforce Comprehensive Anti-Corruption Laws: Governments must establish and empower independent anti-corruption agencies with adequate funding, technical capacity, and prosecutorial powers. This includes implementing robust asset declaration regimes for public officials, enhancing whistle-blower protection, and ensuring severe penalties for corruption offences. Adherence to international instruments like the UNCAC is crucial.

2. Strengthen Public Financial Management (PFM) Systems: Modernise and enforce PFM laws to ensure transparent budgeting, accounting, and auditing processes for all state revenues, expenditures, and assets. This involves adopting international accounting standards (e.g., IPSAS) and empowering Supreme Audit Institutions (SAIs) to conduct independent, regular, and public audits of all government entities and SOEs.

3. Reform State-Owned Enterprise (SOE) Governance: Implement OECD best practices for SOE governance. This includes:

   • Clear Mandates: Defining specific commercial and/or public service mandates for each SOE.
   • Professional Boards: Appointing independent, qualified, and diverse board members based on merit, not political affiliation.
   • Centralised Ownership Policy: Establishing a dedicated state ownership entity (e.g., a holding company or agency) to exercise ownership functions professionally, distinct from line ministries that regulate the sector.
   • Performance Contracts: Requiring SOEs to enter into performance agreements with the government, with clear targets and public reporting on outcomes.

4. Enhance Resource Sector Transparency: Adopt and fully implement initiatives like the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI). This means ensuring:

   • Contract Disclosure: Public disclosure of all resource exploration and production contracts and licences.
   • Beneficial Ownership Transparency: Requiring companies operating in the extractive sector to disclose their ultimate beneficial owners to prevent anonymous shell companies from facilitating illicit financial flows.
   • Revenue Reporting and Reconciliation: Transparent reporting of all payments made by extractive companies and revenues received by governments.

5. Judicial Independence and Rule of Law: A fair, independent, and efficient judiciary is indispensable for enforcing asset management laws, resolving disputes, and prosecuting corruption cases without political interference. Investing in judicial capacity building and integrity measures is paramount.

7.2 Capacity Building and Technical Expertise

Effective asset management hinges on the human capital and institutional capabilities within developing nations.

1. Invest in Human Capital Development: Develop specialised training programmes for government officials, SOE managers, regulators, and legal professionals in areas such as:

   • Resource Economics and Valuation: Equipping officials to negotiate fair terms for resource contracts and value state assets accurately.
   • Financial Management and Audit: Training in modern accounting standards, forensic auditing, and financial analysis.
   • Legal Drafting and Contract Negotiation: Enhancing skills to develop robust contracts that protect national interests.
   • Digital Literacy and Data Analytics: Building capacity to understand and utilise data-driven tools for monitoring and decision-making.

2. Strengthen Institutional Infrastructure: Provide adequate funding and resources for key oversight institutions, including anti-corruption bodies, SAIs, regulatory agencies, and parliamentary committees. This includes investing in modern IT systems for data collection, analysis, and secure record-keeping.

3. Foster Knowledge Transfer and Peer Learning: Facilitate partnerships with international experts, reputable universities, and other developing nations that have successfully implemented asset management reforms. Encourage South-South cooperation and peer-to-peer learning initiatives.

7.3 Leveraging Technology Responsibly

While technology offers significant opportunities, its adoption must be strategic, transparent, and accompanied by robust governance.

1. Strategic and Phased Blockchain Implementation: Governments should approach blockchain adoption cautiously, starting with pilot projects in less complex areas before scaling up. This involves:

   • Clear Use Cases: Identifying specific problems that blockchain is uniquely suited to solve (e.g., land registries, supply chain traceability for specific minerals) rather than adopting it as a blanket solution.
   • Regulatory Sandboxes: Creating controlled environments for testing new blockchain applications, allowing regulators to understand risks and develop appropriate frameworks.
   • Public-Private Partnerships: Collaborating with reputable technology providers and academic institutions, ensuring that intellectual property rights and data governance remain aligned with national interests.

2. Develop Robust Legal and Regulatory Frameworks for Digital Assets: Anticipate the legal implications of tokenised assets, digital currencies, and smart contracts. This requires:

   • Legal Clarity: Defining the legal status of digital assets, ownership rights, and enforcement mechanisms.
   • Consumer/Investor Protection: Implementing safeguards to protect citizens and investors from fraudulent crypto schemes and market volatility.
   • AML/CFT Compliance: Integrating blockchain initiatives within existing anti-money laundering and counter-financing of terrorism frameworks to prevent their misuse for illicit financial flows.

3. Prioritise Transparency and Public Consultation: Any government initiative involving blockchain or tokenisation of state assets must be highly transparent. This means:

   • Public Disclosure: Clearly communicating the objectives, mechanisms, and risks of such projects to the public.
   • Stakeholder Engagement: Actively consulting with civil society organisations, experts, private sector, and affected communities throughout the design and implementation phases.
   • Independent Oversight: Ensuring that independent bodies have the capacity to audit and monitor blockchain-based systems.

4. Digital Inclusion and Literacy: Ensure that technological solutions are accessible and understandable to the broader population. Invest in digital literacy programmes to empower citizens to engage with and benefit from digital governance initiatives, bridging the digital divide.

7.4 Fostering Public Participation and Civil Society Oversight

Beyond formal institutions, an active and informed citizenry is a powerful deterrent against asset exploitation.

1. Support for Civil Society and Investigative Journalism: Create an enabling environment for civil society organisations and investigative journalists to monitor asset management, expose corruption, and hold governments accountable. This includes protecting their rights to freedom of expression and access to information.

2. Open Data Initiatives: Governments should proactively publish data related to state assets, contracts, budgets, and SOE performance in open, machine-readable formats, facilitating public scrutiny and analysis.

3. Grievance Mechanisms: Establish accessible and effective channels for citizens to report corruption, raise concerns about asset mismanagement, and seek redress.

By systematically implementing these recommendations, developing nations can build resilient frameworks that not only protect their invaluable state assets but also transform them into engines of sustainable and equitable development for all citizens.

Many thanks to our sponsor Panxora who helped us prepare this research report.

8. Conclusion

The management of state assets in developing nations stands as one of the most critical determinants of national sovereignty, economic prosperity, and social equity. This comprehensive report has illuminated the multifaceted nature of this challenge, traversing the complex interplay of legal frameworks, governance structures, historical patterns of exploitation, and the emergent complexities introduced by technological innovations like blockchain. We have seen that while state assets – from vast natural resources to strategic infrastructure and financial reserves – are fundamental endowments for development, their mismanagement can lead to a vicious cycle of corruption, economic stagnation, increased inequality, and a dangerous erosion of national autonomy.

Historical accounts of resource curse, asset stripping through corrupt privatisation, and illicit extraction starkly remind us of the immense and often irreversible damage that weak governance and a lack of accountability can inflict. Billions of dollars in potential revenue have been diverted, environmental degradation has become widespread, and future generations have been deprived of their rightful inheritance, all due to systemic failures to protect and prudently manage national wealth.

In the contemporary era, blockchain technology presents a dual-edged sword. Its inherent properties of immutability, transparency, and decentralisation offer revolutionary potential to enhance accountability in land registries, supply chains, and public procurement. However, as evidenced by cautionary tales such as the Central African Republic’s crypto ambitions, the hasty, opaque, or ill-governed implementation of blockchain can paradoxically create new avenues for exploitation, facilitate money laundering, and undermine monetary and national sovereignty. The promise of technology cannot be realised without the parallel development of robust governance, legal clarity, and institutional capacity.

The profound implications of asset mismanagement for national sovereignty are clear: a loss of control over strategic resources can translate into economic dependency, constrained policy space, and diminished geopolitical standing. Economically, it stunts growth, exacerbates inequality, and diverts essential funds from vital public services. Environmentally, it accelerates the degradation of natural capital, leaving future generations with depleted resources and an increasingly vulnerable planet.

To navigate these treacherous waters and harness the full potential of their state assets, developing nations must adopt a comprehensive, proactive, and resilient strategy. This necessitates the strengthening of legal and governance frameworks through the rigorous enforcement of anti-corruption laws, adherence to international standards like EITI and OECD guidelines, and the establishment of truly independent oversight bodies. Simultaneously, investing in capacity building and technical expertise is crucial to equip government officials with the skills needed to negotiate fair deals, manage complex projects, and deploy modern technologies effectively.

Crucially, leveraging technology must be undertaken responsibly. This means strategic, phased implementation of blockchain, backed by clear legal frameworks, extensive public consultation, and robust regulatory oversight to mitigate risks. Finally, fostering public participation, supporting civil society oversight, and promoting a culture of transparency are indispensable for ensuring that state assets are truly managed for the benefit of all citizens, present and future.

By adopting and steadfastly pursuing these recommendations, developing nations can move beyond the historical shackles of asset exploitation, ensuring that their invaluable national endowments serve as powerful catalysts for sustainable development, shared prosperity, and unassailable national sovereignty.

Many thanks to our sponsor Panxora who helped us prepare this research report.

References

• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2025). SOE governance frameworks as a foundation for capital markets development: Africa Capital Markets Report 2025. Retrieved from [https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/africa-capital-markets-report-2025_7d26e1d3-en/full-report/soe-governance-frameworks-as-a-foundation-for-capital-markets-development_25e0441a.html]
• Reuters. (2025, December 17). Opaque crypto schemes endanger Central African Republic state assets, report says. Retrieved from [https://www.reuters.com/world/africa/opaque-crypto-schemes-endanger-central-african-republic-state-assets-report-says-2025-12-17/]
• Brookings Institution. (2025). Governments are turning to blockchain for public good—here’s how. Retrieved from [https://www.brookings.edu/articles/governments-are-turning-to-blockchain-for-public-good-heres-how/]
• Wikipedia. (2025). Blockchain-based Service Network. Retrieved from [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blockchain-based_Service_Network]
• Wikipedia. (2025). Tokenized real-world asset. Retrieved from [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tokenized_real_world_asset]
• Wikipedia. (2025). Legality of cryptocurrency by country or territory. Retrieved from [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legality_of_cryptocurrency_by_country_or_territory]
• Wikipedia. (2025). Bitcoin City. Retrieved from [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bitcoin_City]
• Wikipedia. (2025). Ubuntu Tribe. Retrieved from [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ubuntu_Tribe]
• Global Witness. (Various Reports). Focus on conflict minerals, corruption in extractive industries. (Specific reports cited within text if necessary, otherwise a general reference).
• International Monetary Fund (IMF). (Various Publications). Fiscal Transparency Handbook, Public Investment Management Assessment (PIMA). (General reference for PFM and macroeconomic stability).
• United Nations Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC). (2003). Retrieved from [https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/corruption/uncac.html]
• Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI). (Various Publications). EITI Standard. Retrieved from [https://eiti.org/]
• World Bank. (Various Publications). Governance and Anti-Corruption reports. (General reference for governance initiatives).
• Transparency International. (Various Reports). Corruption Perception Index, National Integrity Systems. (General reference for corruption research).
• Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2012). Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty. Crown Business. (General theoretical background on institutions and development).
• Collier, P. (2007). The Bottom Billion: Why the Poorest Countries Are Failing and What Can Be Done About It. Oxford University Press. (General theoretical background on resource curse and development challenges).