Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs): Transforming Digital Ownership, Provenance, and Anti-Counterfeiting Measures

Abstract

Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) have unequivocally emerged as a profoundly transformative force within the digital landscape, offering unprecedented solutions for establishing verifiable ownership, ensuring unimpeachable provenance, and combating the pervasive challenge of counterfeiting across an increasingly diverse array of industries. This comprehensive research report delves into the multifaceted and evolving applications of NFTs, with a particular focus on their pivotal role in the rigorous management and authentication of unique 3D assets within specialized digital ecosystems such as Depicted. By meticulously examining the sophisticated integration of NFTs in critical sectors including luxury goods, high-value collectibles, and the nascent field of digital twins, the report illuminates their profound potential to fundamentally revolutionize existing paradigms of digital ownership and authenticity validation. Furthermore, the report rigorously addresses the intricate challenges and significant considerations intrinsically associated with the broader adoption of NFTs, encompassing complex technological hurdles, ambiguous legal and regulatory frameworks, and the dynamics of market acceptance, thereby providing an exhaustive and nuanced analysis tailored for experts and stakeholders in the field.

Many thanks to our sponsor Panxora who helped us prepare this research report.

1. Introduction

The advent of Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) has heralded a significant paradigm shift within the global digital economy, enabling the unprecedented creation, secure transfer, and transparent verification of unique digital assets on decentralized blockchain platforms. Fundamentally distinct from cryptocurrencies, which are designed to be interchangeable and identical in value (fungible), NFTs represent discrete, one-of-a-kind items, each imbued with unique attributes, distinct historical provenance, and individualistic value. This intrinsic uniqueness has strategically positioned NFTs as a critical and indispensable component across an expansive spectrum of applications, ranging from the widely publicized domains of digital art and collectibles to the intricate complexities of supply chain management, advanced anti-counterfeiting measures, and even the tokenization of real-world assets.

Historically, the concept of digital scarcity, particularly for intangible goods, has been elusive. Digital files could be effortlessly copied, distributed, and reproduced without any inherent mechanism to distinguish an original from a duplicate, thus undermining concepts of ownership and value. NFTs, through their foundational reliance on blockchain technology, address this fundamental problem by embedding a cryptographic proof of uniqueness and ownership directly into the digital asset itself. This breakthrough allows for the establishment of verifiable and immutable property rights in the digital realm, transforming digital files from infinitely reproducible commodities into scarce, owned assets.

Depicted, as a pioneering platform specializing in the meticulous management of unique 3D assets, leverages the transformative power of NFTs to robustly establish verifiable ownership, meticulously ensure provenance, and foster an unprecedented level of trust within its intricate ecosystem. By tokenizing complex 3D assets – which can range from detailed architectural models and intricate industrial designs to unique gaming characters and virtual fashion items – Depicted directly confronts and mitigates critical challenges related to counterfeiting, unauthorized replication, and the inherent difficulties in asserting authenticity, particularly within industries where the integrity and verifiable fidelity of digital representations are paramount. The application of NFTs in such specific domains underscores their versatility beyond mere art collection, highlighting their utility in industrial, design, and virtual economy contexts.

This comprehensive report undertakes a profound exploration of the broader implications and transformative potential of NFTs. It meticulously examines their underlying blockchain technology, delineates their diverse and burgeoning applications across a multitude of sectors, analyzes their complex economic implications, navigates the evolving landscape of legal frameworks and regulatory considerations, and ultimately assesses their profound transformative potential in revolutionizing digital ownership and authenticity in the 21st century. The overarching aim of this detailed analysis is to provide a comprehensive, nuanced, and forward-looking understanding of NFTs, assessing their current impact, identifying emerging trends, and forecasting their future prospects within the global digital economy.

Many thanks to our sponsor Panxora who helped us prepare this research report.

2. Underlying Blockchain Technology

At their core, Non-Fungible Tokens are inextricably built upon blockchain technology, which functions as a decentralized, distributed, and immutable ledger meticulously recording all transactions across a global network of interconnected computers. This revolutionary architectural structure ensures unparalleled levels of transparency, security, and immutability, rendering blockchain an ideal foundational technology for meticulously tracking and verifying the ownership and historical lineage of unique digital assets.

2.1. Blockchain Standards for NFTs

The inception of NFTs as a widely adopted concept owes much to the standardization efforts within the blockchain community, particularly on the Ethereum network. The Ethereum blockchain, a programmable blockchain capable of hosting smart contracts, introduced specific technical standards that facilitated the creation and management of unique digital tokens.

2.1.1. ERC-721 Standard

The ERC-721 standard, formally known as ‘Non-Fungible Token Standard’, was a pivotal development introduced in 2018. It defined a minimum interface for smart contracts to represent distinct, unique tokens, each with a specific identifier (tokenId). Before ERC-721, creating unique digital assets on a blockchain was largely ad-hoc. This standard provided a clear, universally recognized protocol for tracking ownership and enabling the transfer of these unique tokens between different users and applications. Each ERC-721 token is unique and irreplaceable, much like a specific piece of art or a deed to a house. The standard mandates methods for querying the owner of a token, transferring ownership, and approving other accounts to manage a user’s tokens. Its widespread adoption, especially in the early digital art and collectible markets, cemented the foundational concept of NFTs. Notable examples include CryptoKitties, one of the earliest viral NFT projects, which heavily relied on ERC-721 to manage its unique, collectible digital cats. This standard was crucial for establishing the concept of digital scarcity and verifiable ownership for individual items.

2.1.2. ERC-1155 Standard

Building upon the foundation laid by ERC-721, the ERC-1155 standard, or ‘Multi-Token Standard’, was developed by Enjin and formally adopted in 2019. This standard represents a significant enhancement by allowing a single smart contract to manage multiple token types – encompassing both fungible tokens (like cryptocurrencies or in-game currencies) and non-fungible tokens – simultaneously. This innovative hybrid approach drastically improves efficiency by reducing the number of individual smart contracts required, thereby lowering transaction costs (gas fees) and simplifying deployment. For example, a single ERC-1155 contract can define an NFT for a unique sword in a game, a fungible token for gold coins in the same game, and another NFT for a rare armor set, all within one contract. This versatility makes ERC-1155 particularly well-suited for applications requiring a mix of unique and interchangeable assets, such as gaming ecosystems, where users might own unique items but also trade fungible currency. The standard facilitates batch transfers of tokens, further optimizing network usage and user experience.

2.1.3. Metadata and Storage

Crucially, NFTs are not merely digital files stored on a blockchain. Rather, the NFT itself is a token, a unique entry on the blockchain that points to a specific digital asset. This asset’s descriptive information, often referred to as ‘metadata’, includes details such as the item’s name, description, image URL, and other attributes. The manner in which this metadata and the associated digital file are stored is critical for the long-term integrity and accessibility of the NFT. While the NFT token itself resides on the blockchain, the actual digital content (e.g., the JPEG of an artwork, the GLB file of a 3D asset) is often stored off-chain due to the high costs and storage limitations of blockchains. Common off-chain storage solutions include:

• InterPlanetary File System (IPFS): A peer-to-peer distributed file system that aims to connect all computing devices with the same system of files. Content on IPFS is addressed by its content hash (Content Identifier or CID), ensuring that if the content changes, its address changes. This provides a decentralized and immutable link from the NFT to its underlying asset, mitigating ‘link rot’ where the asset could disappear if hosted on a centralized server.
• Arweave: A protocol that allows for permanent, decentralized data storage by economically incentivizing ‘miners’ to store data indefinitely. Arweave offers a more direct and ‘permaweb’ solution for storing NFT assets and metadata.
• Centralized Servers: Some projects, particularly newer ones or those prioritizing ease of access, might host metadata and assets on traditional centralized servers (e.g., Amazon S3, Google Cloud). While simpler, this introduces a point of centralization and potential single point of failure, as the asset could be removed or altered without affecting the NFT on the blockchain.

The robustness of an NFT project often depends on the decentralization and immutability of its metadata and asset storage, with IPFS and Arweave generally considered more aligned with the decentralized ethos of blockchain.

2.2. Smart Contracts and Automation

Smart contracts are self-executing digital agreements with the terms of the agreement directly encoded into lines of computer code. They reside on and are executed by the blockchain, operating transparently and immutably. In the context of NFTs, smart contracts are the operational backbone, automating a wide array of processes critical to the NFT lifecycle.

2.2.1. Minting and Transfer of Ownership

When an NFT is ‘minted’, a smart contract is executed to create the unique token, assign it a tokenId, link it to its metadata, and record its initial ownership on the blockchain. This process is entirely automated and verifiable. Similarly, when an NFT is transferred from one owner to another, the smart contract automatically updates the ownership record on the blockchain, eliminating the need for intermediaries like banks or legal registrars. This direct, peer-to-peer transfer mechanism significantly reduces transaction friction, cost, and time.

2.2.2. Royalty Payments and Creator Remuneration

One of the most revolutionary aspects of NFTs, facilitated by smart contracts, is the ability to embed perpetual royalty payments for creators. Unlike traditional art markets where creators typically receive no remuneration from secondary sales, NFT smart contracts can be programmed to automatically distribute a percentage of future secondary sales directly back to the original creator’s wallet. For instance, an artist can set a 10% royalty on their NFT, ensuring that every time their artwork is resold on an NFT marketplace, 10% of the sale price is automatically transferred to their specified wallet. This automates creator remuneration, fosters a more equitable distribution of value in the creative economy, and provides a sustainable income stream for artists and intellectual property owners. The enforcement of these royalties can vary; some are strictly on-chain and enforced by the smart contract during every transfer, while others rely on marketplace compliance (off-chain enforcement), which can be less robust.

2.2.3. Access Rights and Utility

Smart contracts can also encode various forms of utility and access rights linked to NFT ownership. For example, an NFT might grant its holder exclusive access to a digital community (e.g., Discord channels), physical events, future product drops, or even voting rights in a Decentralized Autonomous Organization (DAO). The smart contract can be programmed to verify NFT ownership and automatically grant or revoke access based on predefined conditions. This expands the utility of NFTs beyond mere collectibles, transforming them into digital keys that unlock experiences, services, or governance participation.

2.2.4. Security Implications

While smart contracts offer immense benefits in automation and transparency, their immutability also presents a significant security challenge. Once deployed, a smart contract’s code cannot typically be altered. This means any bugs or vulnerabilities in the code can be permanently exploited. High-profile exploits and hacks in the NFT space have often stemmed from vulnerabilities in smart contracts. Consequently, rigorous smart contract audits by specialized security firms are becoming an indispensable practice to identify and mitigate potential flaws before deployment.

2.3. Decentralization, Immutability, and Transparency

The core tenets of blockchain technology—decentralization, immutability, and transparency—are fundamental to the value proposition of NFTs:

• Decentralization: The blockchain operates on a distributed network of computers (nodes) rather than a single central authority. This lack of a central point of control makes the system highly resistant to censorship, single points of failure, and malicious attacks. For NFTs, this means that ownership records and transaction histories are not controlled by a company or government but are maintained by the network itself, empowering individuals with true digital ownership.
• Immutability: Once a transaction or data entry is recorded on the blockchain, it cannot be altered or deleted. This immutability ensures the integrity of NFT ownership records, provenance data, and transaction histories. The complete lifecycle of an NFT, from its minting to every subsequent transfer, is permanently etched onto the public ledger, providing an unalterable audit trail.
• Transparency: All transactions on a public blockchain are visible to anyone, though participant identities are typically pseudonymous (represented by wallet addresses). This transparency allows anyone to verify the authenticity, ownership history, and transaction details of any NFT. This radical transparency helps in combating counterfeiting, verifying provenance claims, and building trust within the NFT ecosystem. However, it also raises privacy considerations, as all transactional history is public.

The underlying consensus mechanism of the blockchain also plays a vital role. Early blockchains like Ethereum used a Proof-of-Work (PoW) mechanism, which requires significant computational power and energy consumption. More recently, Ethereum transitioned to Proof-of-Stake (PoS), a more energy-efficient consensus mechanism. The choice of consensus mechanism directly impacts the environmental footprint and scalability of the blockchain on which NFTs are minted, influencing their broader acceptance and sustainability.

Many thanks to our sponsor Panxora who helped us prepare this research report.

3. Diverse Applications Across Various Sectors

NFTs have dramatically transcended their initial association with digital art and collectibles, establishing themselves as versatile tools with impactful applications across a broad spectrum of industries, addressing longstanding challenges and creating novel opportunities.

3.1. Luxury Goods and Anti-Counterfeiting

The global luxury goods sector faces an existential and pervasive threat from counterfeiting, an illicit industry estimated to be worth hundreds of billions of dollars annually. This criminal activity not only results in significant financial losses for brands but, more critically, undermines brand reputation, erodes consumer trust, and poses potential safety risks with sub-standard counterfeit products. NFTs offer a cutting-edge and robust solution by providing an irrefutable, digital certificate of authenticity and provenance for each physical luxury product.

3.1.1. The Digital Passport for Luxury

By assigning a unique NFT to each luxury item – be it a designer handbag, a high-end watch, or a rare piece of jewelry – brands can create a ‘digital passport’ that accompanies the physical product throughout its lifecycle. This NFT can record critical information, including its manufacturing details, materials used, date of production, original sale point, and even subsequent ownership transfers. Consumers can verify the authenticity of an item by scanning a QR code embedded in the product (or packaging) that links directly to the NFT on the blockchain. This immediately reveals the item’s immutable history, differentiating genuine articles from counterfeits and providing absolute assurance to the buyer.

3.1.2. Case Study: LVMH and AURA Blockchain Consortium

LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton, the world’s leading luxury conglomerate, recognized the imperative for a robust solution to protect its prestigious brands. In a landmark collaboration, LVMH partnered with blockchain technology firm ConsenSys and tech giant Microsoft to develop the AURA Blockchain Consortium (formerly Aura Blockchain Platform), launched in 2019. AURA is a permissioned blockchain, primarily leveraging ConsenSys Quorum (an enterprise version of Ethereum) and Hyperledger Fabric, designed specifically for luxury brands to enhance transparency, provenance, and consumer trust.

Initially joined by LVMH brands such as Louis Vuitton, Christian Dior, and Bulgari, the consortium has since expanded to include other major luxury players like Prada, Cartier, and the OTB Group (Diesel, Maison Margiela). The core functionality of AURA revolves around assigning a unique NFT to each luxury product. This NFT serves as a digital twin, recording a product’s entire journey from the source of its raw materials, through manufacturing stages, quality control, distribution, and ultimately to the point of sale. Each step of the product’s history – its ‘provenance’ – is securely and immutably recorded on the blockchain. Consumers, upon purchasing an AURA-verified product, can scan a unique identifier (often a QR code or NFC tag) to access detailed information about its authenticity, origin, and lifecycle, directly from the blockchain. This transparency empowers consumers with verifiable information, protecting them from counterfeit goods and significantly enhancing brand reputation by demonstrating a commitment to integrity and quality. For brands, AURA provides unparalleled visibility into their supply chains, helping to identify bottlenecks, optimize logistics, and combat parallel markets (grey markets) by tracking unauthorized resales. (medium.com, globallegalpost.com, program-ace.com)

3.1.3. Phygital Assets and Enhanced Customer Engagement

Beyond anti-counterfeiting, NFTs are enabling the creation of ‘phygital’ assets – a blend of physical and digital products. Luxury brands like Nike (with its RTFKT acquisition and CryptoKicks patents), Balmain, and Dolce & Gabbana have launched collections where the purchase of a physical item grants ownership of a corresponding digital NFT. This allows brands to engage with consumers in the metaverse, offer exclusive digital experiences, unlock loyalty rewards, and create new revenue streams through the sale of purely digital collectibles or wearable items for avatars. This strategy extends brand presence into the virtual world while providing tangible benefits and verifiable ownership in both realms.

3.2. Digital Twins in Supply Chain Management

Digital twins are virtual representations of physical assets, processes, or systems. They serve as dynamic, real-time replicas that can be used for monitoring, analysis, simulation, and optimization. When integrated with NFTs, digital twins gain a unique, verifiable identity on the blockchain, providing an unparalleled level of transparency and traceability throughout complex supply chains.

3.2.1. NFT as the Identity Layer for Digital Twins

In this application, an NFT acts as the unique identifier and digital certificate for a physical product or component. Every significant event in the product’s lifecycle—from raw material sourcing, manufacturing, assembly, quality checks, shipping, to maintenance and end-of-life disposal—can be recorded and timestamped on the blockchain, linked to the product’s unique NFT. This creates an immutable, transparent, and comprehensive digital history, forming the basis of the digital twin. This framework is particularly valuable in industries where product integrity, safety, and regulatory compliance are paramount, such as aerospace, pharmaceuticals, automotive, and food.

3.2.2. Case Study: IBM Food Trust and Food Traceability

IBM Food Trust is a pioneering blockchain platform designed to enhance transparency and traceability across the global food supply chain. While not exclusively using NFTs as publicly tradable tokens, the underlying principle involves creating immutable digital records (akin to a unique digital twin anchored by a unique identifier) for food products. Each batch or even individual item of food is tracked from its origin (farm) through processing, packaging, distribution, and ultimately to the consumer’s table. Data points such as farm location, harvest dates, processing facility details, temperature logs during transit, expiry dates, and inspection reports are securely uploaded to the Hyperledger Fabric blockchain network that powers IBM Food Trust.

The benefits are profound: in the event of a foodborne illness outbreak, the source of contamination can be identified in seconds or minutes, rather than days or weeks, significantly reducing the impact on public health and minimizing economic losses from widespread recalls. Consumers gain unprecedented confidence, as they can scan a QR code on a product label to access detailed information about its journey, knowing precisely where their food came from, how it was handled, and its freshness. This system reduces food waste by improving inventory management and optimizing logistics, leading to a more efficient and safer global food system. (medium.com)

3.2.3. Aviation and Manufacturing

Beyond food, the application of NFT-based digital twins extends to high-value manufacturing and complex asset management. In the aviation industry, for example, NFTs can track individual aircraft components, recording their manufacturing history, maintenance logs, repair records, and even the certifications of technicians who serviced them. This ensures the authenticity of parts, streamlines compliance with stringent safety regulations, and enhances predictive maintenance capabilities by providing a complete, verifiable operational history of each component. This approach reduces risks associated with faulty or uncertified parts, improves operational efficiency, and extends the lifespan of critical assets. (mdpi.com)

3.3. Intellectual Property and Digital Rights Management

Managing intellectual property (IP) rights in the digital age is fraught with challenges, including unauthorized use, difficulty in proving ownership, and complex royalty distributions. NFTs offer a novel and highly effective mechanism to tokenize various forms of digital IP, assigning clear, immutable ownership through blockchain technology.

3.3.1. Tokenizing IP Rights

NFTs can represent ownership of a wide range of intellectual property, including copyrights (for digital art, music, literature, video), patents, trademarks, and design rights. By minting an NFT linked to a specific piece of IP, creators establish an undeniable and publicly verifiable record of their ownership claim. This tokenized approach provides a transparent and immutable ledger of ownership, simplifying the process of proving authenticity, licensing agreements, and automating royalty distributions.

For example, a musician can tokenize their song as an NFT, selling fractional ownership stakes or exclusive usage rights to different parties. The smart contract underpinning the NFT can automatically distribute royalties from streaming services or public performances to all rightful owners based on their fractional share, bypassing traditional intermediaries and ensuring direct, transparent payouts to creators and rights holders.

3.3.2. Case Study: University of California, Berkeley and Patent NFTs

In a groundbreaking initiative that redefined the potential of NFTs beyond artistic endeavors, the University of California, Berkeley, announced in May 2021 its intention to auction Non-Fungible Tokens linked to two historically significant patents for inventions that had received Nobel Prizes: the foundational patents for CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing technology and advancements in cancer immunotherapy. This was not a sale of the patents themselves; the university explicitly retained ownership of the underlying intellectual property. Instead, the NFTs represented a unique, verifiable piece of digital history – a ‘Nobel-winning discovery token’ – granting the NFT holder a digital collectible embodying the legacy and innovation associated with these scientific breakthroughs, potentially alongside certain exclusive digital access or recognition.

Crucially, 85% of the funds raised through the sale of these ‘historical’ NFTs were allocated to finance ongoing scientific research at the university. This innovative fundraising model demonstrated the potential of NFTs to unlock new avenues for philanthropic funding and research endowments for academic institutions, moving beyond traditional grants and donations. It also showcased how NFTs could be used to manage and monetize intellectual property in a non-dilutive manner, providing a new way for institutions to engage with their historical contributions and leverage them for future innovation, without ceding core IP rights. (en.wikipedia.org)

3.3.3. Digital Rights Management in Music and Entertainment

The music industry, in particular, has seen significant disruption and innovation through NFTs. Artists can now mint NFTs representing ownership stakes in their songs, albums, or future royalties, allowing fans to directly invest in their careers and share in their success. Platforms like Opulous and Royal enable artists to sell fractionalized song ownership, providing a direct connection between creators and their audience while transparently distributing earnings. This model challenges the traditional record label structure, offering artists greater creative control and more equitable revenue sharing.

3.4. Real Estate and Asset Tokenization

NFTs are increasingly being explored for the tokenization of tangible, real-world assets, with real estate being a prime example. This application leverages NFTs to represent ownership stakes or specific rights to physical properties, moving beyond digital assets to bridge the gap between the physical and digital economies.

3.4.1. Fractional Ownership and Liquidity

One of the most compelling applications of NFTs in real estate is facilitating fractional ownership. Traditionally, investing in real estate requires significant capital, making it inaccessible to many. By tokenizing a property (e.g., creating an NFT for a building or even a portion of it), it can be divided into thousands or millions of smaller, more affordable NFT units. Each unit represents a fractional share of the property. This lowers the barrier to entry for investors, democratizes access to real estate investment, and significantly enhances liquidity for otherwise illiquid assets. Investors can buy and sell these NFT shares on secondary markets much more easily and quickly than traditional property transactions.

3.4.2. Streamlined Transactions and Transparency

NFTs can represent property deeds or land titles on a blockchain, streamlining the transaction process by eliminating the need for numerous intermediaries (lawyers, brokers, banks, title companies). The smart contract can automate the transfer of ownership upon fulfillment of predefined conditions, reducing costs, time, and the potential for fraud. All ownership transfers and property-related data would be immutably recorded on a public ledger, offering unprecedented transparency and traceability.

3.4.3. Challenges and Regulatory Hurdles

While promising, the tokenization of real estate faces significant legal and regulatory challenges. Integrating blockchain-based ownership with existing traditional property laws, which vary widely by jurisdiction, is complex. Issues such as dispute resolution, enforceability of smart contracts in legal courts, and consumer protection frameworks need robust development. Furthermore, these NFTs often represent securities, subjecting them to strict financial regulations.

3.5. Gaming and the Metaverse

The gaming industry has been a fertile ground for NFT innovation, driving the concept of true digital ownership within virtual worlds and enabling entirely new economic models.

3.5.1. True Ownership of In-Game Assets

Traditionally, players in video games do not truly ‘own’ their in-game items (skins, weapons, characters, virtual land). These assets are typically licensed from the game developer and reside on centralized servers. If the game shuts down, or a player is banned, their assets are lost. NFTs revolutionize this by making in-game items truly player-owned assets. Each unique item becomes an NFT, stored on a blockchain, giving players verifiable ownership, the ability to freely trade them on open marketplaces, or even transfer them between compatible games (interoperability).

3.5.2. Play-to-Earn (P2E) Models

NFTs underpin the ‘play-to-earn’ (P2E) gaming model, where players can earn real-world value by playing games. By acquiring, breeding, battling, or trading NFT-based in-game assets (like the ‘Axies’ in Axie Infinity), players can generate cryptocurrency or NFTs that can be sold for fiat currency. This creates new economic opportunities, particularly in developing economies, and transforms gaming from a pure leisure activity into a potential source of income. This model aligns the economic incentives of players and game developers more closely.

3.5.3. Metaverse and Interoperability

NFTs are foundational to the concept of the metaverse – a persistent, interconnected virtual universe. In metaverses like Decentraland and The Sandbox, virtual land plots, avatars, wearable items, and even user-created experiences are represented as NFTs. This allows users to truly own their digital property, build experiences on their land, and transfer their digital identities and assets across different virtual environments. The goal is to achieve interoperability, where an NFT purchased in one virtual world could potentially be used or displayed in another, enhancing the fluidity and realism of digital existence.

3.6. Identity and Credentials

Beyond assets, NFTs are also emerging as a powerful tool for representing unique aspects of digital identity and verifiable credentials.

3.6.1. Decentralized Identity (DID)

NFTs can form a component of a decentralized identity (DID) framework, where individuals control their own digital identities rather than relying on centralized authorities. An NFT could represent unique identifiers, reputations, or even verified claims about a person’s attributes (e.g., ‘verified human being’ in a Web3 context). This aims to give individuals more control over their personal data and how it is shared.

3.6.2. Verifiable Credentials and Badges

NFTs can serve as immutable, verifiable digital certificates for credentials such as academic degrees, professional licenses, certifications, or participation in specific courses/events. A university could issue an NFT for a graduate’s diploma, allowing employers to instantly and verifiably confirm the credential on the blockchain, eliminating the need for costly and time-consuming manual verification processes. Similarly, NFTs are used as ‘proof of attendance protocol’ (POAP) tokens to commemorate participation in events, serving as verifiable digital badges.

Many thanks to our sponsor Panxora who helped us prepare this research report.

4. Economic Implications

The proliferation of NFTs has introduced entirely new economic dynamics, forging unprecedented opportunities for wealth creation, disrupting established industries, and simultaneously presenting novel challenges concerning market stability and investment risk.

4.1. Market Growth and Investment Opportunities

The NFT market has experienced exponential and often volatile growth, captivating a diverse range of investors seeking to capitalize on the appreciation of digital assets. From a niche interest in 2020, the NFT market exploded in 2021 and 2022, with trading volumes reaching tens of billions of dollars annually. This rapid expansion has fostered the emergence of a sophisticated ecosystem comprising numerous specialized marketplaces (e.g., OpenSea, LooksRare, Magic Eden), analytical platforms, and dedicated investment funds.

4.1.1. New Investment Paradigms

NFTs have opened up novel investment paradigms, distinct from traditional financial instruments:

• Digital Collectibles: Investing in digital art, sports memorabilia (e.g., NBA Top Shot), or gaming assets, often driven by cultural significance, community engagement, and speculative potential.
• Utility-Driven NFTs: NFTs that provide access to exclusive communities (e.g., Bored Ape Yacht Club’s Mutant Ape Yacht Club), real-world events, or future token/product drops. Their value is derived from the utility they unlock.
• Fractionalization: The ability to own a mere fraction of a high-value NFT (e.g., a multi-million dollar CryptoPunks NFT being split into thousands of smaller tokens) makes otherwise inaccessible assets attainable for smaller investors, boosting liquidity and expanding the investor base. Platforms like fractional.art (now Tessera) have pioneered this approach.

This growth has democratized investment opportunities, allowing individuals to invest in cultural phenomena and digital property directly, often bypassing traditional financial gatekeepers. It has also stimulated the ‘creator economy,’ enabling artists, musicians, and designers to directly monetize their work and engage with their audience without relying on intermediaries.

4.2. Impact on Traditional Industries

NFTs are not merely creating new markets; they are fundamentally disrupting and transforming traditional industries by introducing innovative models of ownership, value creation, and interaction.

4.2.1. Disintermediation

In industries like music and art, NFTs enable significant disintermediation. Musicians can release their music directly as NFTs, allowing fans to purchase ownership stakes or exclusive access, thereby bypassing record labels and streaming services as sole revenue arbiters. This allows artists to retain a larger share of their earnings and maintain direct relationships with their fanbase. Similarly, digital artists can sell their work directly to collectors on NFT marketplaces, cutting out traditional galleries and auction houses.

4.2.2. New Revenue Streams and Business Models

NFTs introduce entirely new revenue streams for creators and businesses. The embedded royalty mechanism ensures creators earn a percentage on every secondary sale, establishing a perpetual income stream. Businesses can leverage NFTs for loyalty programs, exclusive membership clubs, and innovative marketing campaigns. For instance, brands can issue NFTs that grant holders early access to new product lines, discounts, or unique experiences, fostering deeper brand loyalty and community engagement. The ‘phygital’ model, where a physical product is bundled with a digital NFT, creates cross-platform value and expands market reach.

4.2.3. Enhancement of Existing Markets

Beyond disruption, NFTs also enhance existing markets. In the collectibles industry, NFTs provide irrefutable authenticity and provenance for physical items (e.g., rare sports cards authenticated with an NFT), making them more trustworthy and liquid. They add a new digital dimension to physical collectibles, appealing to a broader demographic and extending the lifespan of the collecting hobby into the digital realm.

4.3. Speculation and Volatility

Despite their transformative potential, the NFT market is characterized by extreme volatility and speculative activity, posing considerable risks for investors and raising critical questions about its long-term sustainability and stability.

4.3.1. Factors Driving Volatility

NFT market volatility is influenced by several factors:

• Hype Cycles and FOMO (Fear Of Missing Out): The market is heavily driven by social media trends, celebrity endorsements, and community sentiment, leading to rapid price surges for certain collections, often followed by sharp corrections.
• Illiquidity for Niche Assets: While overall market volume is high, individual NFTs, particularly less popular ones, can be highly illiquid, making it difficult to sell them at desired prices, contributing to price crashes.
• Lack of Intrinsic Valuation Models: Unlike traditional assets that can be valued based on cash flows or underlying fundamentals, valuing NFTs (especially art and collectibles) is subjective and largely driven by speculative demand, perceived cultural significance, and ‘brand’ recognition within the Web3 space.
• Wash Trading: The practice of an individual or a group simultaneously buying and selling an asset to manipulate its price and artificially inflate trading volume is a known issue in unregulated NFT markets, distorting true market activity.
• Macroeconomic Factors: As a relatively nascent and speculative asset class, NFTs are often highly correlated with the broader cryptocurrency market and global risk appetite, making them susceptible to macroeconomic downturns.

4.3.2. Risks for Investors

The inherent volatility of the NFT market means that prices are subject to rapid and unpredictable fluctuations. Investors face risks of significant capital loss due to market downturns, liquidity crunches, and the subjective nature of valuation. The ‘greater fool theory,’ where an asset’s value is predicated on finding a buyer willing to pay more, is often cited in relation to speculative NFT markets. This dynamic necessitates robust due diligence and a high tolerance for risk for anyone participating in this nascent asset class.

4.4. Liquidity and Fractional Ownership

NFTs are inherently illiquid assets due to their unique nature; finding a willing buyer for a specific unique item can be challenging. However, the concept of fractional ownership is actively addressing this challenge.

4.4.1. Enhancing Liquidity

By ‘fractionalizing’ a high-value NFT into multiple fungible tokens (ERC-20 tokens, for example), its ownership can be distributed among many investors. These fractional tokens are much more liquid than the original single NFT, as they can be traded easily on decentralized exchanges. This process effectively transforms an illiquid asset into a more accessible and tradable one.

4.4.2. Lowering Barriers to Entry

Fractionalization lowers the financial barrier to entry for investors who may not be able to afford an entire high-value NFT (e.g., a CryptoPunk worth millions). It allows smaller investors to gain exposure to blue-chip NFT collections or high-value physical assets tokenized as NFTs, diversifying their portfolios with digital assets that were previously out of reach. This has the potential to democratize investment in digital and tokenized real-world assets.

4.4.3. Challenges with Fractionalization

Despite its benefits, fractionalization introduces new complexities, particularly regarding governance (how decisions about the underlying NFT are made by the fractional owners) and regulatory clarity (whether fractional NFTs constitute securities and are subject to corresponding regulations).

Many thanks to our sponsor Panxora who helped us prepare this research report.

5. Legal Frameworks and Regulatory Considerations

The rapid evolution and diversification of NFTs have outpaced the development of clear and consistent legal frameworks, leading to a complex and often ambiguous regulatory landscape across different jurisdictions. This uncertainty poses significant challenges for creators, investors, platforms, and legal professionals alike.

5.1. Ownership and Intellectual Property Rights

One of the most critical and frequently misunderstood aspects of NFTs pertains to the distinction between owning an NFT and possessing the intellectual property (IP) rights of the underlying asset it represents.

5.1.1. NFT Ownership vs. IP Rights

Crucially, purchasing an NFT typically confers ownership of the digital token itself, a unique entry on a blockchain ledger. It generally does not automatically confer ownership of the underlying intellectual property (e.g., copyright, trademark, patent) associated with the digital asset that the NFT points to. Unless explicitly stated and legally transferred in a separate, binding agreement (often facilitated off-chain or through specific terms within the smart contract), the original creator usually retains the copyright to the artwork, music, or other digital content. This means the NFT owner might have the right to display the NFT as a collector’s item but may not have the right to reproduce, adapt, distribute, or commercially exploit the underlying content without explicit permission or a separate license. (en.wikipedia.org)

5.1.2. Licensing and Terms of Use

To address this ambiguity, many NFT projects and marketplaces attempt to clarify the rights granted to NFT holders through their terms and conditions or specific licensing agreements. These can range from very restrictive (e.g., personal, non-commercial use only) to more expansive (e.g., Creative Commons Zero (CC0) license, which effectively waives all copyright, putting the work in the public domain, or licenses granting specific commercial rights under certain conditions, such as the Bored Ape Yacht Club’s license allowing holders to commercialize the specific ape they own). The legal enforceability of these on-chain or off-chain licenses, particularly across international borders, remains an area of ongoing legal debate and development.

5.1.3. Copyright Infringement and Enforcement

The pseudonymous nature of blockchain combined with the ease of minting NFTs has led to widespread instances of copyright infringement and digital art theft. Malicious actors often mint NFTs of artwork they do not own, selling them to unsuspecting buyers. While marketplaces are increasingly implementing measures to detect and remove infringing NFTs, the immutable nature of the blockchain means that once an infringing NFT is minted, it cannot be ‘unminted.’ Enforcement relies on traditional legal avenues (e.g., cease and desist letters, DMCA takedowns, lawsuits) and the cooperation of centralized platforms, which can be challenging in a decentralized environment.

5.2. Consumer Protection and Fraud Prevention

The nascent and largely unregulated nature of the NFT market exposes consumers to various forms of fraud and necessitates robust protection mechanisms.

5.2.1. Types of Fraud

• Rug Pulls: Project developers abandon a project after raising funds from NFT sales, leaving investors with worthless tokens.
• Phishing and Impersonation: Scammers create fake NFT marketplaces or social media accounts to trick users into revealing private keys or signing malicious transactions.
• Wash Trading: Manipulative practices where an individual or a group artificially inflates an NFT’s perceived value or trading volume by repeatedly buying and selling it to themselves.
• Counterfeit NFTs: Minting and selling NFTs that purport to be from a legitimate collection but are unauthorized copies.
• Art Theft/Copyright Infringement: Minting an NFT of artwork created by someone else without permission.

5.2.2. Due Diligence and Platform Responsibility

Ensuring consumer protection requires a multi-pronged approach. Buyers are advised to conduct thorough due diligence, verifying the authenticity of projects, smart contract addresses, and market activity. NFT marketplaces bear increasing responsibility to implement robust Know Your Customer (KYC) and Anti-Money Laundering (AML) checks, enforce terms of service that prohibit fraudulent activities, and develop systems for detecting and delisting suspicious collections. However, the decentralized ethos often clashes with the imposition of such centralized controls.

5.2.3. Data Privacy

While blockchain transactions are pseudonymous, the public nature of the ledger means that transaction histories linked to wallet addresses are transparent. If a wallet address can be linked to a real-world identity, it raises privacy concerns under regulations like GDPR and CCPA regarding the handling of personal data.

5.3. Taxation and Financial Reporting

The taxation of NFT transactions remains complex and varies significantly across jurisdictions, creating uncertainty for individuals and businesses involved in the NFT ecosystem.

5.3.1. Tax Classification and Events

NFTs can be classified differently for tax purposes depending on the jurisdiction and their specific utility (e.g., as collectibles, property, or in some cases, even securities). Taxable events often include:

• Sale of an NFT: Gains from selling NFTs are typically treated as capital gains, subject to short-term or long-term capital gains tax rates, similar to stocks or other investments.
• Minting and Creation: The act of minting an NFT may not be a taxable event, but selling a newly minted NFT can be.
• Royalty Income: Income received by creators from secondary sales of their NFTs is generally treated as ordinary income.
• Airdrops/Gifts: Receiving NFTs as an airdrop or gift might be considered taxable income at the fair market value at the time of receipt, though rules vary.
• Staking/Lending: Income generated from staking or lending NFTs could be taxable.

5.3.2. Valuation and Reporting Challenges

Valuing NFTs for tax purposes can be challenging due to market volatility and subjective pricing. Determining the cost basis and fair market value at the time of sale or receipt can be difficult. Businesses holding NFTs face additional complexities in terms of financial reporting and accounting standards, which are still evolving to accommodate digital assets.

5.4. Securities Law

An increasingly critical area of regulatory scrutiny for NFTs is whether certain tokens might constitute ‘securities’ under existing financial laws, particularly the Howey Test in the United States. If an NFT is deemed a security, it would be subject to stringent registration, disclosure, and compliance requirements typically enforced by bodies like the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

5.4.1. The Howey Test

The Howey Test evaluates whether a transaction qualifies as an ‘investment contract’ and thus a security. It asks if there is: (1) an investment of money (2) in a common enterprise (3) with a reasonable expectation of profits (4) to be derived from the entrepreneurial or managerial efforts of others. While many NFTs (e.g., unique digital art pieces) are generally not considered securities, NFTs that come with explicit promises of future profits, passive income, or represent fractional ownership in a revenue-generating asset could potentially fall under this definition. This includes fractionalized NFTs of real estate, certain gaming NFTs that promise returns, or NFTs linked to revenue-sharing schemes.

5.4.2. Implications

If an NFT project is deemed to be selling unregistered securities, it could face severe legal repercussions, including fines, injunctions, and civil lawsuits. This uncertainty creates a significant hurdle for many innovative NFT projects, particularly those involving utility or investment-like features. Regulators globally are grappling with how to apply existing laws to novel digital assets, leading to a patchwork of varying interpretations and enforcement actions.

Many thanks to our sponsor Panxora who helped us prepare this research report.

6. Challenges and Considerations

While NFTs present a revolutionary paradigm for digital ownership and value creation, their widespread and sustainable adoption is contingent upon successfully navigating a complex array of technological, legal, market, and ethical challenges.

6.1. Technological Hurdles

Implementing a robust and scalable blockchain infrastructure capable of supporting the high demands of NFT ecosystems requires significant investment and continuous innovation.

6.1.1. Scalability and Transaction Throughput

Public blockchains, especially those that were initially based on Proof-of-Work (PoW) like Ethereum before its Merge, have faced significant scalability limitations. High transaction volumes lead to network congestion, slow transaction speeds, and exorbitantly high ‘gas fees’ (transaction costs), making micro-transactions or frequent interactions with NFTs economically unfeasible for many users. While Layer 2 scaling solutions (e.g., Arbitrum, Optimism, Polygon) and the transition to Proof-of-Stake (PoS) aim to address these issues, achieving truly massive, instantaneous throughput remains a core challenge for mainstream adoption.

6.1.2. Energy Consumption and Environmental Impact

The environmental impact of blockchain networks, particularly those relying on PoW consensus mechanisms, has raised considerable concerns. PoW requires vast amounts of computational power, leading to high energy consumption and a significant carbon footprint. While Ethereum’s successful transition to PoS in ‘The Merge’ drastically reduced its energy consumption (by over 99%), other PoW chains (like Bitcoin, which also supports some NFT-like protocols) continue to consume substantial energy. For NFTs to gain broader acceptance, especially among environmentally conscious consumers and corporations, the industry must continue its shift towards more sustainable and energy-efficient blockchain technologies. (web3smartprivacy.com)

6.1.3. Interoperability

The blockchain landscape is fragmented, with numerous distinct blockchains (Ethereum, Solana, Polygon, Avalanche, Flow, Tezos, etc.) operating independently. This lack of inherent interoperability means that an NFT minted on one blockchain typically cannot be easily used or transferred to another without complex bridging solutions or wrapping, which introduces additional technical risks and reduces the fluidity of the digital asset ecosystem. Achieving seamless interoperability between different blockchain networks is crucial for realizing the vision of a truly interconnected metaverse and broader Web3 applications.

6.1.4. User Experience (UX) and Security

The current user experience for interacting with NFTs can be intimidating for mainstream users. Concepts like cryptographic wallets, seed phrases, gas fees, and smart contract approvals are complex and prone to user error. This steep learning curve is a significant barrier to adoption. Furthermore, the responsibility of private key management rests entirely with the user, making them susceptible to phishing attacks, wallet hacks, and accidental loss of funds if security best practices are not meticulously followed.

6.1.5. Long-Term Data Persistence (Link Rot)

As discussed, the actual digital content and metadata of an NFT are often stored off-chain. If the centralized server hosting this data goes offline, or if the linking service fails, the NFT on the blockchain would still exist, but it would effectively point to nothing, becoming a ‘broken link.’ While decentralized storage solutions like IPFS and Arweave mitigate this, ensuring the permanent availability and integrity of associated digital assets remains a challenge requiring robust infrastructure and diligent curation.

6.2. Legal and Regulatory Issues

The evolving and fragmented legal landscape surrounding digital ownership and intellectual property rights in relation to NFTs presents substantial complexities for businesses and individuals.

6.2.1. Global Regulatory Disparity

There is no universally accepted legal definition or classification for NFTs, leading to a patchwork of varying interpretations across different jurisdictions. Some countries may classify NFTs as collectibles, others as digital assets, and certain utility or fractionalized NFTs might be deemed securities. This lack of harmonization creates regulatory uncertainty, potential for jurisdictional arbitrage, and challenges for international operations.

6.2.2. Enforcement of Digital Rights

Enforcing intellectual property rights and contractual agreements associated with NFTs across borders can be challenging. Legal recourse against infringement or fraud in a pseudonymous, global, and decentralized environment often relies on traditional legal frameworks that were not designed for blockchain technology. The interaction between on-chain smart contract code and off-chain legal contracts is still being defined by courts.

6.2.3. Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Know Your Customer (KYC)

The pseudonymous nature of blockchain transactions can potentially be exploited for illicit activities such as money laundering. Regulators are increasingly scrutinizing NFT marketplaces and platforms to implement robust AML and KYC procedures to identify users and prevent financial crimes. Balancing these requirements with the decentralized and privacy-centric ethos of Web3 is an ongoing regulatory challenge.

6.3. Market Adoption

Achieving widespread market adoption for NFTs, particularly in critical sectors like anti-counterfeiting and supply chain management, requires significant behavioral shifts and trust-building efforts among various stakeholders.

6.3.1. Hype Cycle and Skepticism

The NFT market has often been associated with speculative bubbles, sensational headlines about exorbitant prices, and instances of fraud. This ‘hype cycle’ has led to a degree of public skepticism and cynicism, making it harder for legitimate and utility-driven NFT applications to gain mainstream trust and adoption. Overcoming this perception requires demonstrating tangible, long-term value propositions beyond mere speculation.

6.3.2. Education and Awareness

There is a significant need for education and awareness campaigns to help consumers, businesses, and policymakers understand the fundamental technology, benefits, and responsible use of NFTs. Demystifying blockchain concepts and highlighting real-world applications is crucial for fostering broad understanding and reducing perceived risks.

6.3.3. Integration with Legacy Systems

For NFTs to be effectively integrated into traditional industries (e.g., luxury goods, supply chain), they must seamlessly connect with existing legacy IT systems, databases, and operational workflows. This often requires complex API development, data standardization, and organizational change management, which can be costly and time-consuming.

6.3.4. Cost and Accessibility

Despite efforts towards more efficient blockchains, the costs associated with minting, trading, and interacting with NFTs (gas fees, marketplace fees) can still be prohibitive for some users, particularly in emerging markets. Furthermore, access to the necessary infrastructure (reliable internet, compatible devices) and financial services can be limited for significant portions of the global population, contributing to a ‘digital divide’ in Web3 adoption.

6.4. Ethical and Societal Concerns

Beyond technical and legal hurdles, NFTs also raise important ethical and societal questions that warrant careful consideration.

6.4.1. Environmental Impact (Revisited)

While newer blockchains are more energy-efficient, the cumulative environmental footprint of the broader Web3 ecosystem remains a concern for many. Critics point to the energy consumption of Bitcoin, which underpins some NFT-like protocols, and the overall resource intensity of blockchain technology, especially if widespread adoption leads to exponential growth in network activity. The industry must continue to prioritize sustainable development and educate the public on the differences between various blockchain technologies.

6.4.2. Financial Exploitation and Scams

The unregulated nature of much of the NFT market has created fertile ground for scams, phishing attacks, and outright fraud. Novice investors, lured by the promise of quick riches, are particularly vulnerable. The lack of robust consumer protection mechanisms, combined with the difficulty of reversing blockchain transactions, means that victims often have little recourse, leading to significant financial losses and erosion of public trust.

6.4.3. Digital Divide and Inequality

The high barriers to entry (technical complexity, financial cost, access to infrastructure) can exacerbate existing inequalities. If NFTs become a primary vehicle for digital ownership and value creation, a significant portion of the global population might be excluded, widening the digital divide and creating new forms of economic disparity.

6.4.4. Cultural Impact and Artist Compensation Fairness (Revisited)

While NFTs offer new revenue streams for artists, concerns persist about the broader cultural impact. Some critics argue that the speculative nature of the market prioritizes financial gain over artistic merit, leading to a proliferation of low-quality art or ‘cash grabs.’ Additionally, while royalties are promised, their enforcement can be inconsistent across different marketplaces, and the environmental impact of certain NFT platforms has drawn criticism from within the art community itself.

6.4.5. Centralization Risks in a Decentralized Space

Despite the decentralized ethos of blockchain, many parts of the NFT ecosystem have consolidated around centralized entities: large NFT marketplaces (OpenSea), specific blockchain layers (Ethereum), or fiat on/off-ramps. This introduces points of centralization that could be vulnerable to censorship, regulatory pressure, or single points of failure, undermining the core principles of decentralization.

Many thanks to our sponsor Panxora who helped us prepare this research report.

7. Conclusion

Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) have unequivocally demonstrated immense potential in fundamentally transforming established paradigms of digital ownership, meticulously ensuring provenance, and robustly combating counterfeiting across an increasingly diverse array of sectors. Their strategic integration into sophisticated ecosystems like Depicted exemplifies the profound capacity of NFTs to manage and authenticate unique 3D assets with verifiable ownership and unparalleled trust.

From revolutionizing anti-counterfeiting measures in the luxury goods sector through transparent digital passports (as seen with LVMH’s AURA Blockchain Consortium) to enhancing traceability and safety in global supply chains via NFT-anchored digital twins (as pioneered by IBM Food Trust), and from enabling innovative intellectual property monetization for academic institutions (like UC Berkeley’s patent NFTs) to transforming in-game economies and fostering true digital ownership in the burgeoning metaverse, NFTs are catalyzing profound shifts in how value is created, owned, and exchanged in the digital age. They are democratizing access to previously illiquid assets through fractional ownership, empowering creators with direct revenue streams, and fostering vibrant, community-driven economies.

However, the widespread and sustainable adoption of NFTs necessitates a comprehensive and concerted effort to address the multifaceted challenges that currently impede their full realization. Technologically, advancements in scalability, energy efficiency (e.g., transition to Proof-of-Stake), and interoperability across disparate blockchain networks are paramount. Legally, the development of clear, consistent, and globally harmonized regulatory frameworks is crucial to define ownership rights, ensure consumer protection, clarify tax liabilities, and mitigate risks associated with fraud and illicit activities. Market adoption hinges on building trust, overcoming public skepticism, simplifying user experiences, and effectively integrating blockchain solutions with existing legacy systems. Furthermore, ethical considerations regarding environmental impact, financial inclusion, and the potential for societal inequalities must be continuously evaluated and proactively addressed to ensure responsible innovation.

By fostering collaborative initiatives between industry stakeholders, policymakers, and technological innovators, investing in sustainable and user-friendly blockchain infrastructure, and committing to transparent and equitable practices, NFTs can transcend their current speculative perception and truly realize their transformative potential as an indispensable pillar of the evolving digital economy. Their journey is just beginning, but the foundational capabilities they offer for verifiable digital ownership and authenticity are poised to reshape industries and redefine our relationship with digital assets in profound and lasting ways.

Many thanks to our sponsor Panxora who helped us prepare this research report.

References

• BlockSpan. (n.d.). ‘NFTs and Anti-Counterfeiting Measures: Reinventing Authenticity in the Retail Sector’. Retrieved from blockspan.com
• Wikipedia. (n.d.). ‘Non-fungible token’. Retrieved from en.wikipedia.org
• Medium. (n.d.). ‘NFTs Beyond Art: Real-World Applications’. Retrieved from medium.com
• MDPI. (n.d.). ‘NFT-Based Framework for Digital Twin Management in Aviation Component Lifecycle Tracking’. Retrieved from mdpi.com
• The Global Legal Post. (n.d.). ‘NFTs: Luxury Retail’s New Frontier’. Retrieved from globallegalpost.com
• Websima DMCC. (n.d.). ‘NFTs in Dubai Luxury Market: Enhancing Exclusive Products’. Retrieved from websima.ae
• Program-Ace. (n.d.). ‘Blockchain and NFTs: Guardians of Luxury Brand Authenticity’. Retrieved from program-ace.com
• Web3 Smart Privacy. (n.d.). ‘How NFTs in the Web3 Ecosystem Are Revolutionizing Digital Ownership and Value’. Retrieved from web3smartprivacy.com
• Wepin. (n.d.). ‘The Trust Revolution in Luxury: How Blockchain Is Transforming the Industry’. Retrieved from wepin.io
• SEALSQ. (n.d.). ‘Luxury & Consumer Goods’. Retrieved from sealsq.com