Investor Psychology in Cryptocurrency Markets: Behavioral Insights and Implications for Investment Strategies

Abstract

The cryptocurrency market’s unprecedented growth, coupled with its inherent and often extreme volatility, has transformed the landscape of global finance. This dynamic environment attracts a diverse cohort of investors, each influenced by distinct psychological profiles, cognitive predispositions, and decision-making heuristics. This comprehensive research meticulously investigates the behavioral economics underpinning investor psychology within the cryptocurrency domain, extending beyond conventional financial models to explore the intricate interplay of cognitive biases, powerful emotional drivers, and pervasive social influences that collectively sculpt investment behaviors. By systematically analyzing these multifaceted psychological factors, this study endeavors to furnish a granular and expansive understanding of how human psychology profoundly impacts market dynamics in the nascent digital asset space. Furthermore, it aims to delineate sophisticated and practical strategies, grounded in behavioral insights, for investors to more adeptly navigate this complex, often irrational, and rapidly evolving market landscape, fostering more resilient and informed investment approaches.

Many thanks to our sponsor Panxora who helped us prepare this research report.

1. Introduction: The Uncharted Waters of Cryptocurrency Markets

The advent of cryptocurrencies, spearheaded by Bitcoin in 2009, has ushered in a profound paradigm shift in the global financial sector. These decentralized digital assets, powered by revolutionary blockchain technology, promise unparalleled transparency, security, and autonomy from traditional financial intermediaries. The allure of substantial, often rapid, returns has drawn millions of individuals and institutional entities into this burgeoning market, transforming it into a significant, albeit volatile, component of the global economy. However, the very characteristics that define cryptocurrencies – such as their borderless nature, 24/7 trading, rapid technological innovation, and nascent regulatory frameworks – also contribute to their notorious price fluctuations and unpredictable market cycles.

Traditional financial theories, predicated on the Efficient Market Hypothesis and the assumption of perfectly rational economic agents (homo economicus), often struggle to adequately explain the erratic and frequently speculative behaviors observed in cryptocurrency markets (Glaser et al., 2014). These models, while foundational, do not fully account for the systematic deviations from rationality that are commonplace when individuals make financial decisions under conditions of uncertainty and high emotion. The unique characteristics of the cryptocurrency ecosystem, including its rapid information dissemination, reliance on community consensus, and susceptibility to narratives, necessitate a deeper exploration through the lens of behavioral economics to fully comprehend investor actions and their aggregate impact on market outcomes.

This research embarks on an in-depth exploration of investor psychology in the cryptocurrency space, moving beyond a simplistic view of market participants as purely rational actors. It integrates insights from psychology, sociology, and economics to construct a holistic framework for understanding how cognitive shortcuts, emotional impulses, and social contagion effect investment choices. The objective is to provide a nuanced analysis of these psychological underpinnings, offering both academic insights into market anomalies and practical guidance for investors seeking to mitigate the risks inherent in such a dynamic and psychologically charged environment.

Many thanks to our sponsor Panxora who helped us prepare this research report.

2. Theoretical Foundations: Behavioral Economics and Investor Psychology

2.1. A Paradigm Shift in Economic Thought

Behavioral economics represents a critical evolution in economic thought, challenging the foundational assumptions of classical economics by integrating insights from psychology, cognitive science, and neuroscience into economic models. Pioneering work by scholars such as Daniel Kahneman, Amos Tversky, Richard Thaler, and Hersh Shefrin demonstrated that human decision-making often deviates from pure rationality due to inherent cognitive limitations, emotional influences, and reliance on mental shortcuts or heuristics (Thaler, 2015; Shefrin, 2002). This field posits that these systematic biases lead to predictable patterns of irrational behavior that can significantly impact financial markets, resulting in anomalies and inefficiencies that traditional models cannot explain.

In the context of investment, behavioral economics suggests that investors are not always dispassionate calculators of risk and return. Instead, their decisions are frequently swayed by psychological factors such as fear, greed, overconfidence, and social pressures (Pompian, 2012). These factors can lead to suboptimal outcomes, including buying high and selling low, holding onto losing investments too long, or chasing speculative bubbles. Understanding these psychological underpinnings is not merely an academic exercise; it is crucial for analyzing and anticipating investor behavior in volatile markets like cryptocurrency.

2.2. The Unique Landscape of Cryptocurrency Markets and Its Amplification of Psychological Effects

Cryptocurrency markets present an almost ideal petri dish for observing behavioral biases in magnified form due to several distinctive characteristics:

  • Extreme Volatility: Unlike traditional asset classes, cryptocurrencies can experience percentage changes in value within hours or days that would take years in conventional markets. This rapid price action intensifies emotional responses, making rational decision-making significantly harder.
  • Decentralization and Lack of Traditional Regulation: The absence of centralized oversight or established regulatory bodies means fewer guardrails against speculative excess and market manipulation. This environment places a greater burden on individual investors to exercise caution, yet simultaneously empowers a sense of rebellious freedom that can feed overconfidence.
  • 24/7 Global Trading: The continuous nature of crypto markets, unrestricted by geographical boundaries or trading hours, means investors are constantly exposed to price movements and information flows, increasing the potential for impulsive decisions driven by real-time data.
  • High Information Asymmetry: Despite the transparency of blockchain ledgers, fundamental analysis of crypto projects can be complex, often requiring deep technical understanding. Many investors rely on easily accessible, but often unreliable, information from social media, exacerbating biases.
  • Community-Driven Narratives: Cryptocurrencies are deeply intertwined with strong online communities and compelling narratives (e.g., ‘digital gold,’ ‘Web3 revolution’). These narratives, while powerful for adoption, can also lead to speculative bubbles detached from underlying utility.
  • Novelty and Complexity: The relatively new and complex nature of blockchain technology and tokenomics means many investors lack a complete understanding of what they are investing in, making them more susceptible to herd behavior and charismatic influencers.

These factors combine to create an environment where the psychological vulnerabilities of investors are not only present but are often amplified, leading to profound effects on individual portfolio performance and overall market dynamics (Abdeldayem & Hameed Aldulaimi, 2024).

Many thanks to our sponsor Panxora who helped us prepare this research report.

3. Cognitive Biases: Distortions in Cryptocurrency Investor Decision-Making

Cognitive biases are systematic errors in thinking that affect the decisions and judgments that people make. They are often unconscious and arise from heuristics or mental shortcuts our brains use to simplify complex information. In the high-stakes, fast-paced world of cryptocurrency, these biases can lead to significant financial consequences.

3.1. Fear of Missing Out (FOMO)

FOMO is a pervasive psychological phenomenon characterized by the apprehension that one might miss out on rewarding experiences that others are having, especially if one is not participating. In financial markets, particularly cryptocurrency, FOMO translates into an impulsive urge to buy an asset solely to avoid missing out on potential future gains, irrespective of the asset’s underlying fundamentals or a thorough risk assessment. The rapid and often parabolic price movements characteristic of crypto assets, widely broadcast across social media and financial news, intensely amplify FOMO (Zakieh et al., 2022).

This bias frequently drives speculative bubbles. Investors, seeing a cryptocurrency’s price surge, fear being left behind and rush to buy at inflated prices, pushing the value even higher in a self-fulfilling prophecy. This often leads to purchasing at market peaks, only to experience sharp corrections shortly thereafter. The consequences are often severe, as these hasty decisions bypass critical analysis, risk management, and long-term investment planning, typically resulting in significant capital losses when the market inevitably reverses.

3.2. Loss Aversion

Loss aversion, a core concept in prospect theory introduced by Kahneman and Tversky, describes the psychological tendency for individuals to prefer avoiding losses over acquiring equivalent gains. The pain of losing a certain amount is felt more acutely than the pleasure of gaining the same amount. This fundamental asymmetry in our perception of gains and losses profoundly influences investment decisions. In the context of cryptocurrency, loss aversion manifests in several detrimental ways.

Investors may irrationally hold onto losing positions, often referred to as ‘holding bags,’ in the desperate hope of a market rebound that will allow them to ‘break even.’ This behavior stems from the intense discomfort associated with realizing a loss. Instead of cutting losses and reallocating capital, investors become anchored to their initial purchase price, allowing small losses to snowball into catastrophic ones, particularly in a market known for dramatic downturns. Conversely, loss aversion can also lead investors to take profits too early on winning positions, fearing a reversal, thereby missing out on larger potential gains. This bias fundamentally hinders rational portfolio management and timely decision-making, leading to suboptimal investment strategies.

3.3. Overconfidence Bias

Overconfidence bias occurs when individuals overestimate their own abilities, knowledge, and judgment, particularly regarding their predictive accuracy. In the cryptocurrency market, this bias can be particularly potent. The thrill of early success, perhaps from a fortuitous speculative bet, can inflate an investor’s sense of skill, leading them to believe they possess superior insight or predictive capabilities beyond what is statistically warranted.

This inflated self-belief often translates into excessive risk-taking, such as over-concentrating a portfolio in highly speculative assets, neglecting diversification, or foregoing fundamental research. Overconfident investors might also trade more frequently, believing they can ‘time the market,’ leading to higher transaction costs and often worse overall performance. They may dismiss expert advice or cautionary signals, convinced of their own infallible judgment. The volatile nature of crypto, where luck can often be mistaken for skill, further fuels this bias, making investors vulnerable to significant drawdowns when their overconfidence inevitably collides with market realities.

3.4. Herd Mentality

Herd mentality, or herd behavior, describes the tendency of individuals to align their actions and decisions with those of a larger group, often ignoring their own analysis or privately held beliefs. This bias is driven by a combination of social proof, the desire to conform, and the assumption that the ‘crowd’ possesses superior information. In the decentralized and community-driven world of cryptocurrency, herd mentality is a powerful force.

Social media platforms, forums, and online communities (like Reddit, Telegram, and Twitter) act as accelerators for herd behavior. When a particular coin begins to gain traction or is heavily promoted by influencers, investors may feel compelled to join in, fearing ostracization or missing out on collective gains. This can lead to massive inflows into speculative assets, driving prices far beyond their intrinsic value and creating unsustainable bubbles. Conversely, during market downturns, herd mentality can trigger panic selling, as investors observe others liquidating their positions and fear being the last to exit. This collective flight can exacerbate market crashes, as seen during major crypto bear markets, leading to rapid price escalations or declines that deviate significantly from any underlying fundamental values (Miori & Cucuringu, 2022).

3.5. Other Relevant Cognitive Biases in Crypto Investing

Beyond the primary biases, several other cognitive distortions play significant roles in cryptocurrency investment decisions:

  • Confirmation Bias: Investors tend to seek out, interpret, and remember information in a way that confirms their pre-existing beliefs or hypotheses. In crypto, this means selectively engaging with news, social media posts, or analyses that support their investment in a particular token, while dismissing contradictory evidence. This can prevent a balanced assessment of risk and lead to entrenched positions, even when fundamentals deteriorate.
  • Anchoring Bias: This bias involves an over-reliance on the first piece of information encountered (the ‘anchor’) when making decisions. For crypto investors, this might mean fixating on the initial purchase price of a coin, or a widely publicized all-time high, when evaluating its current value. This anchor can prevent them from objectively assessing the asset’s true worth or from cutting losses when appropriate.
  • Availability Heuristic: Individuals tend to judge the probability of an event by how easily examples or instances come to mind. In the crypto space, highly publicized success stories (e.g., early Bitcoin millionaires) or spectacular failures are vivid and easily recalled. This can lead investors to overestimate the likelihood of similar dramatic gains or losses, influencing their risk appetite irrespective of the actual probabilities.
  • Sunk Cost Fallacy: This refers to the irrational tendency to continue an endeavor or investment simply because one has already invested significant time, money, or effort into it, even when continuing is no longer rational or optimal. In crypto, this often manifests as holding onto a severely underperforming asset because ‘so much has already been lost,’ rather than cutting ties and reallocating capital to more promising ventures.
  • Framing Effect: Decisions are often influenced by the way information is presented or ‘framed,’ rather than on its objective content. For example, presenting a crypto project’s potential in terms of ‘revolutionary technology with 100x potential’ versus ‘high-risk speculative asset with uncertain adoption’ can drastically alter investor perception and willingness to invest, even if the underlying facts remain the same.

These biases, individually and in combination, significantly distort rational decision-making, contributing to the erratic and often unpredictable nature of cryptocurrency markets.

Many thanks to our sponsor Panxora who helped us prepare this research report.

4. Emotional Drivers and Socio-Cultural Influences

Beyond cognitive biases, raw emotions and profound social dynamics exert immense pressure on cryptocurrency investors, often overriding rational thought processes and exacerbating market volatility.

4.1. The Dual Forces of Greed and Fear

Greed and fear are arguably the most fundamental and powerful emotional drivers in financial markets, particularly amplified in the high-stakes environment of cryptocurrency. These emotions are not merely abstract concepts; they trigger physiological responses that can impair cognitive function and push investors towards extreme behaviors.

  • Greed: The intoxicating promise of quick riches and exponential returns fuels greed, driving investors to chase ever-higher returns. In crypto bull markets, greed manifests as euphoric risk-seeking behavior, leading to excessive leverage, buying into increasingly speculative assets (e.g., meme coins with little to no fundamental value), and a disregard for prudent risk management. The desire for ‘life-changing wealth’ can override caution, leading investors to commit disproportionate amounts of capital based on hype rather than diligence. This emotional state is often characterized by a feeling of invincibility and a belief that ‘this time is different.’
  • Fear: Conversely, fear dominates during market downturns. The sight of rapidly depreciating portfolios, coupled with negative news cycles, can trigger panic and anxiety. This emotional state often leads to indiscriminate panic selling, where investors liquidate their assets at a loss simply to stop the bleeding, even if the long-term prospects of their investments remain sound. Fear can also paralyze investors, preventing them from making necessary rebalancing decisions or taking advantage of market dips. The ‘Fear & Greed Index,’ a widely cited metric in crypto, attempts to quantify these prevailing market sentiments, illustrating their cyclical dominance and profound impact on market direction.

The interplay between greed and fear creates volatile market cycles, from periods of unsustainable euphoria and speculative bubbles to brutal bear markets marked by capitulation and despair. These emotional oscillations are a primary driver of market volatility and often lead to irrational decision-making, where investors buy at the peak of greed and sell at the trough of fear.

4.2. The Pervasive Role of Social Media and Digital Communities

Social media platforms and specialized digital communities (such as Twitter, Reddit, Telegram groups, Discord servers, and YouTube) are not merely information channels in the cryptocurrency space; they are integral to its very fabric and significantly shape market sentiment and investor behavior (Ahmed et al., 2025).

  • Rapid Information Dissemination and Amplification: News, rumors, and opinions spread at an unprecedented speed, often without robust verification. A tweet from an influential figure or a viral post can instantly move markets. This rapid dissemination, coupled with algorithms designed to maximize engagement, can amplify specific narratives or sentiments, creating powerful feedback loops.
  • Influencer Marketing and ‘Shilling’: Many investors, lacking the time or expertise for independent research, rely heavily on ‘crypto influencers’ or thought leaders. These figures, whether genuine educators or those with vested interests (‘shillers’), can sway thousands, if not millions, of followers, leading to coordinated buying or selling pressure. This dynamic is ripe for manipulation, as influencers may promote projects in which they hold significant positions, often without full disclosure.
  • Echo Chambers and Tribalism: Crypto communities often develop strong in-group identities and loyalties to specific projects or tokens. This tribalism can lead to the formation of echo chambers, where dissenting opinions are suppressed, and confirmation bias is rampant. Investors within these groups may become emotionally attached to their holdings, defending them fiercely and resisting any negative information, regardless of its validity. This can blind them to critical risks and foster unrealistic expectations.
  • Information Overload and Noise: The sheer volume of information (and misinformation) available on social media can be overwhelming. Investors struggle to differentiate credible sources from speculative hype or outright scams. This information overload can lead to analysis paralysis, or conversely, impulsive decisions based on the loudest or most recent voices, rather than careful discernment.
  • Coordinated Market Manipulation: The decentralized nature of crypto and the collective power of social media enable ‘pump and dump’ schemes. Coordinated groups can inflate the price of an obscure token through aggressive promotion, only to sell off their holdings at the peak, leaving latecomers with significant losses. Social media acts as the primary tool for orchestrating such schemes.

These platforms, while offering valuable insights and community support, also create an environment highly susceptible to collective irrationality, significantly contributing to the volatility and speculative nature of cryptocurrency markets.

4.3. Narrative Economics and Storytelling

In nascent and technologically complex markets like cryptocurrency, compelling narratives often hold more sway than traditional financial fundamentals. Narrative economics, a concept explored by Robert Shiller, suggests that stories and popular narratives drive economic decision-making and asset prices. Cryptocurrencies, with their innovative technology and aspirational goals, are particularly fertile ground for powerful narratives.

Investors often buy into the ‘story’ of a crypto project – be it Bitcoin’s narrative as ‘digital gold’ and a hedge against inflation, Ethereum’s vision of a ‘world computer’ for decentralized applications, or the promises of Web3 to decentralize the internet. These narratives, often communicated through whitepapers, developer conferences, and social media, capture the imagination and foster strong belief systems. The emotional resonance of these stories can lead investors to overlook technical challenges, regulatory hurdles, or an absence of immediate utility, valuing the potential future impact over current realities. This reliance on storytelling can create disconnects between market valuations and tangible progress, making markets vulnerable to shifts in dominant narratives or the emergence of more compelling alternatives.

Many thanks to our sponsor Panxora who helped us prepare this research report.

5. Mitigating Psychological Pitfalls: Strategies for Rational Crypto Investment

Understanding the psychological factors influencing investor behavior is the first step; the next is developing robust, actionable strategies to mitigate their detrimental effects and foster more rational, disciplined investment decisions in the cryptocurrency market.

5.1. Robust Risk Management Frameworks

Effective risk management is paramount in mitigating the impact of emotional decision-making and safeguarding capital against the extreme volatility of crypto markets. A comprehensive framework includes:

  • Portfolio Diversification: Spreading investments across various cryptocurrencies, including established assets (e.g., Bitcoin, Ethereum), promising altcoins with different use cases (e.g., DeFi, NFTs, Layer 2s), and potentially stablecoins for capital preservation. Diversification should also extend beyond crypto to traditional assets to hedge against systemic market downturns. It is a critical countermeasure against overconfidence and herd mentality, preventing overexposure to any single asset or narrative.
  • Position Sizing: Determining the appropriate amount of capital to allocate to each investment based on its risk profile and the investor’s overall risk tolerance. This prevents any single loss from catastrophically impacting the entire portfolio. This discipline directly combats greed, which often encourages excessive allocation to high-risk ventures.
  • Strategic Use of Stop-Loss and Take-Profit Orders: Implementing pre-defined exit strategies can automate decision-making, removing emotion from the equation. Stop-loss orders automatically sell an asset if it drops below a certain price, limiting potential losses (a direct counter to loss aversion). Take-profit orders secure gains when an asset reaches a target price, preventing greed from turning profits into losses during a reversal.
  • Regular Portfolio Rebalancing: Periodically adjusting the portfolio back to its target asset allocation. This forces investors to sell assets that have performed well (countering the tendency to hold winners too long due to confirmation bias) and buy assets that have underperformed (a disciplined approach to buying low, often against the prevailing fear).
  • Invest Only What You Can Afford to Lose: This fundamental principle of high-risk investing is crucial in crypto. It ensures that even in a worst-case scenario, financial stability is not jeopardized, significantly reducing the emotional intensity associated with market fluctuations and empowering more rational choices.

5.2. Fostering Financial Literacy and Behavioral Awareness

Education is the most powerful tool against cognitive biases and emotional impulsivity. A well-informed investor is better equipped to recognize and counteract psychological pitfalls:

  • Understanding Blockchain Technology and Tokenomics: Deep diving into the underlying technology, use cases, whitepapers, team backgrounds, and token distribution models (tokenomics) of potential investments is crucial for fundamental analysis. This knowledge provides a solid basis for evaluating projects beyond mere hype, challenging confirmation bias and availability heuristic.
  • Learning About Behavioral Finance: Explicitly studying common cognitive biases, heuristics, and emotional drivers (like those detailed in this report) can help investors identify these patterns in their own thinking and in the broader market. Self-awareness is the first step towards behavioral debiasing (Bai et al., 2025).
  • Developing a Personal Investment Philosophy: Defining clear investment goals, risk tolerance, and a long-term strategy provides a guiding framework that can insulate against short-term market noise, FOMO, and herd mentality. A disciplined plan acts as a pre-commitment strategy, making it harder to deviate impulsively.
  • Cognitive Debiasing Techniques: Practicing techniques such as ‘pre-mortem’ analysis (imagining why an investment might fail before committing) or seeking ‘outside view’ perspectives (considering how others might view the investment objectively) can help challenge overconfidence and confirmation bias.

5.3. Embracing Analytical and Systematic Decision-Making

Moving away from impulsive, emotion-driven decisions towards a structured, data-informed approach is critical for long-term success:

  • Fundamental Analysis (FA): Focusing on the intrinsic value of a cryptocurrency by evaluating its technology, development team, ecosystem growth, community engagement, competitive landscape, regulatory compliance, and real-world utility. This approach directly counteracts speculative buying driven by FOMO or social media hype.
  • Technical Analysis (TA): While debated in its efficacy for highly speculative assets, TA involves analyzing historical price charts and trading volumes to identify patterns and predict future price movements. When used judiciously and in conjunction with FA, it can help identify potential entry and exit points, reducing the impact of emotional timing. However, relying solely on TA without understanding fundamentals can exacerbate biases like anchoring.
  • Investment Journaling: Maintaining a detailed record of investment decisions, including the rationale, expected outcomes, and actual results, allows investors to learn from their successes and failures. This reflective practice can expose personal biases and improve future decision-making.
  • Rule-Based Strategies and Automation: Employing systematic trading strategies, such as Dollar-Cost Averaging (DCA), where a fixed amount of money is invested at regular intervals regardless of price, removes emotional timing and reduces the impact of volatility. Algorithmic trading, while more complex, can also execute decisions based on pre-defined rules, eliminating human emotion.

5.4. The Role of Regulatory Developments and Investor Protection

As the cryptocurrency market matures, regulatory frameworks are slowly emerging. While decentralization is a core tenet, responsible regulation can play a significant role in mitigating some of the psychological pitfalls by:

  • Enhancing Transparency: Requiring clearer disclosures from crypto projects and exchanges can reduce information asymmetry and protect against fraudulent schemes, combating biases like confirmation bias and the availability heuristic which thrive on incomplete information.
  • Consumer Protection: Regulations aimed at preventing market manipulation (e.g., pump and dump schemes) and ensuring the security of investor funds can build confidence and reduce the impact of fear during market downturns (Balusamy et al., 2025).
  • Financial Education Initiatives: Government or industry-led initiatives to educate the public about the risks and complexities of cryptocurrency investing can empower individuals to make more informed decisions, directly addressing the need for greater financial literacy.

Many thanks to our sponsor Panxora who helped us prepare this research report.

6. Conclusion

Investor psychology undeniably plays a pivotal and often dominant role in shaping the volatile dynamics of cryptocurrency markets. The decentralized, 24/7, and highly speculative nature of digital assets creates an environment where cognitive biases, powerful emotional drivers, and pervasive social influences are not merely present, but often amplified to extreme levels. Phenomena such as Fear of Missing Out (FOMO), loss aversion, overconfidence, and herd mentality frequently override rational analysis, leading to suboptimal investment decisions and exacerbating market boom-bust cycles.

By acknowledging and deeply understanding these inherent psychological vulnerabilities, investors can embark on a journey towards more informed and resilient strategies. Moving beyond the simplistic notion of rational economic actors, a behavioral economics lens provides crucial insights into why individuals act against their long-term interests in the face of speculative fervor or panic. Implementing robust risk management frameworks, fostering continuous financial literacy, and committing to systematic, analytical decision-making are not just best practices; they are essential defensive mechanisms against the psychological traps inherent in this nascent financial frontier.

Ultimately, a conscious awareness of one’s own biases and emotional triggers, combined with a disciplined, data-driven approach, not only contributes to individual investment success but also promotes greater stability, efficiency, and maturity within the broader cryptocurrency market. As the digital asset space continues to evolve, the integration of behavioral insights will become increasingly indispensable for both investors navigating its complexities and policymakers seeking to ensure its responsible development.

Many thanks to our sponsor Panxora who helped us prepare this research report.

7. Future Research Directions

The rapidly evolving cryptocurrency market presents numerous avenues for further interdisciplinary research into investor psychology. Future studies could explore:

  • The impact of artificial intelligence and machine learning on investor sentiment analysis and algorithmic trading strategies, and how these technologies might either mitigate or inadvertently amplify behavioral biases.
  • Cross-cultural differences in cryptocurrency adoption and investment behavior, examining how cultural norms, regulatory environments, and economic conditions influence psychological responses across different investor demographics.
  • The long-term psychological impacts of extreme volatility on investor mental health and financial well-being, particularly for those who have experienced significant gains or losses.
  • The effectiveness of various debiasing techniques in real-world crypto trading environments, and the development of educational tools specifically designed to counteract prominent biases in this market.
  • The interplay between traditional financial markets and cryptocurrency markets from a behavioral perspective, investigating how sentiment and biases in one market might spill over into the other.

These areas of inquiry will further deepen our understanding of the human element in digital finance, paving the way for more robust investment practices and a more stable market ecosystem.

Many thanks to our sponsor Panxora who helped us prepare this research report.

References

  • Abdeldayem, M., & Hameed Aldulaimi, S. (2024). Investment decisions determinants in the GCC cryptocurrency market: A behavioural finance perspective. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 32(6), 1073–1087. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-02-2023-3623
  • Ahmed, M. S., Helmi, M. H., Tiwari, A. K., & Al-Maadid, A. (2025). Investor attention and market activity: Evidence from green cryptocurrencies. Studies in Economics and Finance, 42(3), 397–426. https://doi.org/10.1108/SEF-08-2024-0518
  • Bai, Z., Zheng, S., & Jia, M. (2025). Financial constraints and cryptocurrency investment: The moderating role of financial education. International Journal of Bank Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-12-2024-0759
  • Balusamy, S., Rengasamy, R., & Aravind, J. (2025). Protecting Financial Transactions and Cryptocurrency Networks from Fraud Using AI-Powered Blockchain Technology. 2025 International Conference on Green Intelligent Computing Technologies and Applications (GINOTECH). https://doi.org/10.1109/GINOTECH63460.2025.11076940
  • Glaser, M., Weber, M., & Noeth, M. (2014). Behavioral finance. In G. M. Constantinides, M. Harris, & R. M. Stulz (Eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Finance (Vol. 2, pp. 617–649). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-44-459406-8.00009-0
  • Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
  • Miori, V., & Cucuringu, M. (2022). Market sentiment and cryptocurrency returns: A survey. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 31, 100497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2022.100497
  • Pompian, M. M. (2012). Behavioral Finance and Wealth Management: An Overview. Wiley.
  • Shefrin, H. (2002). Beyond Greed and Fear: Understanding Behavioral Finance and the Psychology of Investing. Oxford University Press.
  • Thaler, R. H. (2015). Misbehaving: The Making of Behavioral Economics. W.W. Norton & Company.
  • Zakieh, M., Akter, S., & Sultana, N. (2022). Bitcoin as a Behavioral Bellwether: Unveiling the Bandwagon Effect and Investor Sensitivity in the NFT Landscape. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 16(4), 1234–1256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-025-02788-5

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*