Central Bank Digital Currencies: A Global Perspective on Development, Design, and Implications

July 3, 2025 Research Reports 0

Abstract

Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) have emerged as a profoundly transformative force in the global financial landscape, catalyzing an intensive exploration by central banks worldwide into their multifaceted potential. This includes the ambition to radically modernize payment systems, profoundly enhance financial inclusion for underserved populations, and robustly assert national monetary sovereignty amidst a rapidly evolving digital economy. This comprehensive report meticulously analyzes the intricate ecosystem of CBDCs, delving deep into the compelling motivations underpinning their development, the diverse and often complex design models being contemplated and deployed, and the multifaceted, often contentious, debates surrounding their practical implementation. By thoroughly exploring pivotal case studies from trailblazing nations such as China and advanced economies like those within the European Union, alongside emerging market initiatives and other significant global developments, the report offers unparalleled insights into both the potential benefits and inherent risks associated with CBDCs. Particular emphasis is placed on critical considerations such as the safeguarding of individual privacy, the preservation of financial stability across various economic scenarios, and their far-reaching geopolitical implications in an increasingly interconnected world. This analysis aims to provide a holistic understanding of the role CBDCs are poised to play in shaping the future of money and finance.

1. Introduction

Many thanks to our sponsor Panxora who helped us prepare this research report.

1.1 The Evolution of Money and the Digital Imperative

The history of human civilization is inextricably linked to the evolution of money. From primitive bartering systems and commodity money like shells or salt, through the standardization of coinage and the subsequent advent of banknotes, to the rise of ledger-based bank deposits, each transformation has reflected underlying societal, technological, and economic shifts. The late 20th and early 21st centuries have witnessed an accelerated digital revolution, fundamentally reshaping industries from communication and entertainment to transportation and healthcare. The financial sector, as a cornerstone of modern economies, has been at the forefront of this digital metamorphosis, driven by the pervasive adoption of electronic payment systems, online banking, and mobile financial applications.

Against this backdrop, the concept of Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) has rapidly ascended to prominence. CBDCs represent the latest evolutionary step in the monetary system: a digital form of a country’s official fiat currency, meticulously issued, regulated, and backed by its central bank. This distinguishes them fundamentally from decentralized private cryptocurrencies, such as Bitcoin or Ethereum, which operate on distributed ledger technologies without a central authority, and also from private stablecoins, which attempt to peg their value to a traditional fiat currency but are issued by commercial entities. CBDCs, by contrast, are designed to marry the inherent stability, trust, and legal tender status of traditional fiat money with the efficiency, innovation, and accessibility offered by digital technologies.

Many thanks to our sponsor Panxora who helped us prepare this research report.

1.2 The Global Surge in CBDC Interest

The global interest in CBDCs has intensified dramatically over the past decade, moving from theoretical discussions to concrete research, intricate pilot programs, and high-level policy deliberations across a diverse array of nations. This surge in interest is not monolithic; it reflects a convergence of varied national priorities, economic structures, and technological readiness. While some nations, particularly emerging economies, prioritize financial inclusion and payment system modernization, advanced economies often focus on maintaining monetary sovereignty, enhancing resilience against new forms of digital money, and improving the efficiency of wholesale payments. The Bank for International Settlements (BIS), a key forum for central banks, reported in 2023 that approximately 93% of central banks surveyed were actively engaged in some form of CBDC work, whether through research, pilot programs, or development phases, a significant increase from just a few years prior ([BIS, ‘Annual Economic Report 2023’]).

This report embarks on a comprehensive journey into the global landscape of CBDCs. It meticulously analyzes the principal motivations driving their development, dissects the various nuanced design models being adopted or considered, and explores the multifaceted, ongoing debates regarding their potential advantages, profound challenges, and systemic implications. By providing a detailed examination of diverse approaches and experiences, this report aims to offer a robust framework for understanding the profound impact CBDCs are poised to have on domestic financial systems, international payment architectures, and the broader geopolitical balance of power.

2. Motivations for Developing CBDCs

Central banks are exploring the development of CBDCs for a complex array of interconnected reasons, each driven by a desire to enhance the functionality, resilience, and inclusivity of their respective financial ecosystems.

Many thanks to our sponsor Panxora who helped us prepare this research report.

2.1 Enhancing Payment Efficiency and Innovation

2.1.1 Streamlining Domestic Transactions

Traditional payment systems, while largely effective, are often characterized by legacy infrastructure, multiple intermediaries, and batch processing, which can lead to notable delays and elevated transaction costs. Interbank transfers, for instance, frequently involve a series of steps through correspondent banks, adding layers of complexity and expense. CBDCs offer the potential to fundamentally streamline payment processes by facilitating direct, instant, and potentially ubiquitous transfers of central bank money. This ‘directness’ can significantly reduce the number of intermediaries, thereby cutting transaction costs for both consumers and businesses, and accelerating settlement times from hours or days to mere seconds or milliseconds.

For example, China’s digital yuan (e-CNY) is explicitly designed to provide instant retail payments, aiming to reduce reliance on existing, sometimes less efficient, payment networks and significantly enhance overall transaction efficiency ([en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_renminbi’]). This immediacy can have profound economic benefits, enabling faster circulation of money, improving liquidity management for businesses, and supporting the growth of digital commerce. The inherent finality of settlement in a CBDC system, akin to physical cash, also mitigates settlement risk, a crucial advantage in high-volume payment systems.

2.1.2 Fostering Innovation in Payments

Beyond basic efficiency, CBDCs can serve as a potent catalyst for innovation in payment services. By providing a stable, risk-free digital base layer, they can encourage private sector innovation in developing new applications and services that leverage the underlying CBDC infrastructure. This could lead to novel forms of programmable money, where payments can be set to execute automatically upon the fulfillment of specific conditions (e.g., ‘smart contracts’). Such programmability could revolutionize supply chain finance, automate government disbursements, or enable micro-payments for the digital economy, unlocking new business models and services that are currently cumbersome or uneconomical with existing payment rails. For instance, the concept of ‘triggering’ payments directly from a central bank’s ledger upon the delivery of goods or services, verified by IoT devices, represents a significant leap in efficiency and trust.

Many thanks to our sponsor Panxora who helped us prepare this research report.

2.2 Promoting Financial Inclusion

Financial inclusion remains a critical global development challenge. A significant portion of the global adult population, particularly in developing economies, remains unbanked or underbanked, lacking access to essential financial services such as secure payment mechanisms, savings accounts, or affordable credit. This exclusion perpetuates poverty and limits economic participation.

CBDCs offer a secure, low-cost, and accessible means of payment for these underserved populations, effectively bridging the gap where traditional banking infrastructure is either non-existent, too costly, or inaccessible. Many CBDC designs envision a mobile-first approach, leveraging the widespread penetration of mobile phones even in remote areas. For example, Ghana’s E-Cedi is explicitly designed to be accessible via simple mobile devices, facilitating financial inclusion for individuals who may not have formal bank accounts but possess a basic mobile phone ([en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E-Cedi’]). By providing a direct pathway to digital payments, CBDCs can empower individuals to engage more fully in the formal economy, receive remittances securely, access government benefits directly, and reduce reliance on less secure and more expensive cash transactions or informal money transfer services. Furthermore, the potential for offline functionality in some CBDC designs could ensure continued access to payments even in areas with limited internet connectivity, addressing another significant barrier to inclusion.

Many thanks to our sponsor Panxora who helped us prepare this research report.

2.3 Strengthening Monetary Sovereignty and Financial Stability

2.3.1 Counteracting Private Digital Currencies and Stablecoins

The proliferation of private digital currencies, particularly stablecoins that peg their value to major fiat currencies (like Tether or Circle’s USDC), and the potential emergence of global private cryptocurrencies (such as Meta’s Diem project, formerly Libra, before its pivot), pose unique challenges to national monetary systems and central bank control. If these private digital monies gain widespread adoption, they could fragment the monetary landscape, undermine the central bank’s ability to conduct monetary policy, and potentially create new sources of financial instability. Concerns include a potential ‘dollarization’ or ‘euroization’ of digital payments in economies where foreign stablecoins become dominant, eroding national currency usage.

CBDCs provide central banks with a robust tool to maintain firm control over their national currency and monetary policy. By offering a state-backed digital alternative, CBDCs can ensure that the primary medium of exchange remains the sovereign currency, preventing the erosion of monetary policy effectiveness and preserving financial stability. The European Central Bank’s (ECB) initiative to develop a digital euro is partly driven by concerns over the dominance of non-European payment providers and the strategic need to preserve the euro’s international role and autonomy in a digital age ([en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_euro’]). This represents a defensive strategy to ensure that the foundational layer of money remains firmly within the public domain and under the purview of democratically accountable institutions.

2.3.2 Enhancing Resilience and Security

CBDCs can also contribute to the overall resilience and security of a nation’s payment infrastructure. By providing a direct liability of the central bank, CBDCs offer the highest degree of safety and soundness, eliminating credit risk and liquidity risk inherent in commercial bank money. In times of financial stress or crisis, a CBDC could serve as a ‘safe haven’ digital asset, preventing widespread bank runs by offering a secure alternative to commercial bank deposits. Furthermore, a well-designed CBDC system could enhance operational resilience against cyberattacks or natural disasters by diversifying the payment infrastructure and reducing reliance on a single point of failure within the traditional banking system. This provides a crucial backup mechanism, ensuring continuity of payment services even under extreme conditions.

Many thanks to our sponsor Panxora who helped us prepare this research report.

2.4 Facilitating Cross-Border Payments

Cross-border transactions are notoriously complex, costly, and time-consuming. They typically involve multiple intermediaries (correspondent banks), intricate regulatory compliance checks (AML/CFT), and often multiple currency conversions, leading to high fees, slow settlement, and a lack of transparency. The current correspondent banking system, while functional, is recognized as inefficient and prone to friction.

CBDCs hold significant promise for simplifying and accelerating these international payment flows. By enabling direct peer-to-peer or central bank-to-central bank transfers of digital sovereign currency, they can dramatically reduce the number of intermediaries, thereby lowering costs and accelerating settlement times. The BIS Project mBridge, a multi-CBDC platform involving central banks from China, Hong Kong, Thailand, and the UAE, is a prime example of collaborative efforts to explore how CBDCs can facilitate more efficient, cheaper, and faster cross-border payments ([BIS, ‘Project mBridge’]). Such platforms could revolutionize global trade and remittances, making international commerce more accessible and affordable for businesses and individuals alike. China’s proactive exploration of cross-border applications for the digital yuan, including ongoing pilot programs with Hong Kong’s financial hub, clearly illustrates this potential ([en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_renminbi’]). This represents a significant strategic advantage, potentially reshaping global financial architecture and trade relationships by offering a more streamlined alternative to the traditional SWIFT-based system.

Many thanks to our sponsor Panxora who helped us prepare this research report.

2.5 Combating Illicit Finance

While privacy concerns are paramount, a well-designed CBDC system can also offer significant advantages in combating illicit financial activities such as money laundering, terrorism financing, and tax evasion. Unlike physical cash, which is entirely anonymous, or some private cryptocurrencies used for illicit purposes, CBDCs can be designed with varying degrees of traceability. This allows authorities to implement sophisticated transaction monitoring and analysis capabilities, while still upholding reasonable privacy for legitimate transactions.

Central banks can implement robust ‘know your customer’ (KYC) and ‘anti-money laundering’ (AML) frameworks directly within the CBDC ecosystem. For instance, transaction limits or thresholds could trigger enhanced due diligence. The inherent digital nature means that every transaction leaves a verifiable footprint, which, when coupled with appropriate legal frameworks and safeguards, can greatly enhance the ability to identify and prosecute illicit financial flows. This offers a potent tool for law enforcement agencies, striking a balance between privacy and public safety.

3. Design Models of CBDCs

The architectural design of a CBDC is a multifaceted endeavor, profoundly influenced by a country’s specific economic objectives, existing financial infrastructure, regulatory philosophy, and technological capabilities. There is no one-size-fits-all solution; rather, central banks are exploring a spectrum of design models, each with distinct implications for the financial system and the broader economy.

Many thanks to our sponsor Panxora who helped us prepare this research report.

3.1 Wholesale vs. Retail CBDCs

3.1.1 Wholesale CBDCs

Wholesale CBDCs (wCBDCs) are primarily designed for interbank transactions and other large-value transfers between financial institutions, including commercial banks, clearing houses, and other authorized financial market participants. Their primary objective is to enhance the efficiency, security, and resilience of the wholesale payment and settlement landscape. wCBDCs aim to replace or complement existing real-time gross settlement (RTGS) systems, which are currently the backbone of interbank payments.

Key characteristics of wCBDCs include:

  • Restricted Access: Access is limited to regulated financial institutions, not the general public.
  • Efficiency in Large-Value Payments: They can significantly improve the speed and reduce the cost of large-value interbank payments, securities settlement, and foreign exchange transactions.
  • Mitigation of Settlement Risk: By allowing for atomic settlement (where both legs of a transaction, e.g., security and payment, settle simultaneously), wCBDCs can virtually eliminate settlement risk (specifically, principal risk) in financial markets.
  • Interoperability: They are often explored for cross-border interbank payments and could facilitate the development of multi-CBDC platforms, as seen in projects like BIS Project Jura or mBridge.

Several central banks, including the Bank of England with its conceptual work on a wholesale CBDC, and the Swiss National Bank with Project Helvetia, have actively explored the potential of wCBDCs to enhance the settlement of interbank payments and tokenized securities ([BIS, ‘Project Helvetia III’]). These explorations typically involve distributed ledger technology (DLT) to enable features like delivery-versus-payment (DvP) and payment-versus-payment (PvP) in a more efficient manner.

3.1.2 Retail CBDCs

Retail CBDCs (rCBDCs), conversely, are designed for use by the general public, serving as a digital form of cash for everyday transactions. They are a direct liability of the central bank, providing the highest form of money to consumers and businesses. rCBDCs aim to complement existing payment methods, such as physical cash and commercial bank deposits, rather than entirely replacing them.

Key characteristics of rCBDCs include:

  • Broad Access: Available to individuals and non-financial businesses.
  • Enhanced Financial Inclusion: Can provide access to digital payments for the unbanked and underbanked.
  • Resilience and Safety: Offers a risk-free digital payment option, as it carries no credit or liquidity risk associated with commercial banks.
  • Payment System Modernization: Can foster innovation in retail payments and potentially reduce reliance on private payment monopolies.

China’s digital yuan (e-CNY) is the most prominent and advanced example of a retail CBDC, designed for widespread public use across various sectors and provinces ([en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_renminbi’]). Similarly, the European Central Bank’s investigation into a digital euro is squarely focused on a retail CBDC, aiming to provide a widely accessible, safe, and efficient digital payment instrument for euro area citizens.

Many thanks to our sponsor Panxora who helped us prepare this research report.

3.2 Direct vs. Intermediated CBDCs

This distinction primarily concerns the operational model for interacting with end-users and distributing the CBDC.

3.2.1 Direct CBDCs (Single-Tier Model)

In a direct CBDC model, also known as a single-tier model, the central bank would directly manage all aspects of the digital currency, including issuing it, maintaining the ledger of holdings, and directly managing accounts for individuals and businesses. In this scenario, individuals would hold digital currency accounts directly with the central bank, bypassing commercial banks as intermediaries for holding central bank money.

  • Advantages: Potentially offers the central bank greater control over the currency, direct insights into monetary flows, and could foster deeper financial inclusion by providing direct central bank accounts. It also eliminates counterparty risk at the commercial bank level.
  • Disadvantages: This approach would necessitate significant changes to the existing financial system, potentially disintermediating commercial banks from their deposit-taking function. It would require central banks to develop extensive retail customer service infrastructure, manage anti-money laundering (AML) and know-your-customer (KYC) processes for millions of users, and handle complex data management, which falls outside their traditional operational scope. This model could also concentrate too much power and data with the central bank.

Few central banks are seriously considering a purely direct model for retail CBDCs due to these profound implications and operational complexities. Most view it as too disruptive to the established two-tier banking system.

3.2.2 Intermediated CBDCs (Two-Tier Model)

The intermediated CBDC model, often referred to as a two-tier or hybrid model, is the prevailing preference among central banks. In this approach, the central bank issues the digital currency to commercial banks and other authorized payment service providers, who then act as intermediaries, distributing the digital currency to the public. Consumers and businesses would hold their CBDC in digital wallets or accounts provided by these regulated intermediaries, much like they hold traditional bank deposits today. The central bank maintains the core ledger and oversees the system, while the intermediaries manage customer-facing operations, KYC/AML, and innovate on payment services.

  • Advantages: This model leverages existing banking infrastructure, payment networks, and the established customer relationships of commercial banks. It maintains the crucial role of commercial banks in the financial system, allowing them to continue their functions of credit creation, liquidity management, and risk assessment. It also distributes the operational burden and risk associated with managing retail accounts. This preserves the two-tiered banking system, which is vital for financial stability and credit allocation.
  • Disadvantages: Requires careful design to ensure the CBDC maintains its central bank liability status while being managed by intermediaries. It also necessitates clear regulatory frameworks for intermediaries.

Sweden’s e-krona pilot, for instance, explicitly involves collaboration between the Riksbank (central bank) and commercial banks to test the feasibility and operational aspects of a digital currency within an intermediated framework ([coinmarketcap.com/academy/article/central-bank-digital-currencies-a-map-of-the-world’]). The ECB’s proposed digital euro framework also leans heavily towards an intermediated model, seeing commercial banks and payment service providers as crucial distributors and innovators in the ecosystem.

Many thanks to our sponsor Panxora who helped us prepare this research report.

3.3 Other Critical Design Considerations

Beyond the fundamental wholesale/retail and direct/intermediated distinctions, several other design choices profoundly influence a CBDC’s functionality, impact, and public acceptance:

3.3.1 Technology Base: DLT vs. Centralized Ledger

While CBDCs are often conflated with blockchain technology due to the rise of cryptocurrencies, a CBDC does not necessarily have to be based on a distributed ledger technology (DLT). A CBDC can be implemented using a conventional, centralized database managed directly by the central bank.

  • Centralized Ledger: A traditional, centralized database offers simplicity, proven scalability, and full control by the central bank. It is akin to how many existing real-time gross settlement (RTGS) systems operate.
  • Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT): DLT, including blockchain, offers potential benefits like enhanced resilience (due to distributed copies of the ledger), transparency (for certain types of CBDCs), and the ability to support programmable money features more natively. However, DLTs pose challenges related to scalability, energy consumption (for proof-of-work systems, though most CBDC proposals favour proof-of-stake or permissioned DLTs), and the governance of decentralized networks.

Most current retail CBDC explorations, such as the e-CNY, are based on centralized architectures, prioritizing control and scalability. Wholesale CBDCs, however, often explore DLT for its ability to facilitate atomic settlement of tokenized assets and enhance interoperability across multiple participants.

3.3.2 Account-Based vs. Token-Based

This distinction relates to how ownership of the CBDC is recorded and verified:

  • Account-Based: Similar to traditional bank accounts, where ownership is verified by identifying the account holder (e.g., via KYC checks) and linking them to a balance in a central ledger. Transactions involve debiting one account and crediting another. This model offers strong identity verification and easier implementation of AML/CFT measures.
  • Token-Based: Analogous to physical cash, where ownership is proven by possession of a cryptographic ‘token’. Transactions involve the transfer of these tokens from one digital wallet to another, without necessarily requiring real-time identification of the transacting parties, offering higher levels of privacy. However, managing anti-counterfeiting measures and ensuring irrevocability for a purely token-based system can be complex.

Many CBDC designs are exploring hybrid models that combine elements of both, aiming to offer the benefits of both approaches (e.g., privacy for small transactions, identity for large ones) while mitigating their respective drawbacks.

3.3.3 Interest-Bearing vs. Non-Interest-Bearing

A crucial policy decision is whether the CBDC will bear interest or not.

  • Non-Interest-Bearing: Similar to physical cash, a non-interest-bearing CBDC would not pay any interest to its holders. This design minimizes the risk of direct competition with commercial bank deposits, thereby reducing disintermediation concerns and preserving banks’ funding base.
  • Interest-Bearing: An interest-bearing CBDC could potentially be a powerful monetary policy tool, allowing central banks to directly influence demand for money and transmit policy rates more directly to the public. However, it significantly increases the risk of financial disintermediation, as individuals might shift large sums from commercial banks to the central bank, especially during periods of financial stress or if the CBDC offers a more attractive interest rate.

Most central banks are leaning towards a non-interest-bearing retail CBDC to minimize the risk of financial instability and avoid disrupting the commercial banking sector’s critical role in credit creation.

3.3.4 Programmability

Programmability refers to the ability to embed specific rules or conditions directly into the CBDC unit itself or into the payment system. This enables ‘smart contracts’ that execute automatically when predefined conditions are met.

  • Use Cases: Programmability could facilitate targeted government transfers (e.g., welfare payments that can only be spent on specific goods or services, or that expire if not used by a certain date), automated payments in supply chains, or the creation of innovative financial products.
  • Concerns: Raises significant privacy concerns and questions about central bank overreach into individual spending habits. There are also debates about whether programmability should be a core feature of the CBDC itself or layered on top by private service providers.

While wholesale CBDCs are often seen as a natural fit for programmability in complex financial transactions, the application of programmability to retail CBDCs is a subject of intense debate, with many central banks stressing that any such features would be optional and driven by market demand.

4. Global Case Studies

The global exploration of CBDCs is diverse, reflecting varied national priorities, regulatory environments, and technological capabilities. This section provides detailed insights into some of the most prominent CBDC initiatives around the world.

Many thanks to our sponsor Panxora who helped us prepare this research report.

4.1 China: Digital Yuan (e-CNY)

China has undeniably been a global frontrunner in the development and deployment of a retail CBDC, the digital yuan, officially known as e-CNY or Digital Currency Electronic Payment (DCEP). Launched in pilot phases in 2020, the e-CNY project is the most extensive and advanced retail CBDC initiative globally.

4.1.1 Motivations and Objectives

The People’s Bank of China (PBOC) has articulated several key motivations for the e-CNY:

  • Payment System Modernization: To create a more efficient, resilient, and inclusive domestic payment infrastructure, reducing reliance on the dominant private payment duopoly of Alipay and WeChat Pay.
  • Financial Inclusion: To provide a sovereign digital payment option to unbanked and underbanked populations, particularly in rural areas.
  • Monetary Sovereignty: To maintain control over monetary policy in an increasingly digital economy and to counter the influence of private digital currencies.
  • Combating Illicit Activities: To enhance traceability of funds, thereby assisting in the fight against money laundering, terrorism financing, and tax evasion, while balancing privacy concerns for small transactions.
  • Internationalization of the Renminbi: While initially focused on domestic use, the PBOC has openly explored the e-CNY’s potential for cross-border payments, aiming to facilitate renminbi usage in international trade and investment, potentially offering an alternative to the U.S. dollar-centric global financial system.

4.1.2 Design and Implementation

The e-CNY operates on a two-tier model. The PBOC issues the digital yuan to authorized commercial banks, which then distribute it to the public via digital wallets. It is primarily an account-based system, though it aims to emulate cash-like features for small, anonymous transactions. The technology backbone is a centralized ledger controlled by the PBOC, prioritizing speed, scalability, and central control over decentralization.

The pilot program has expanded aggressively, extending across 17 provincial regions and encompassing a vast array of scenarios, including public transport, retail commerce, education, healthcare, and tourism. As of June 2024, the total transaction volume reached an impressive 7 trillion e-CNY (approximately $986 billion USD), indicating significant public adoption within the pilot zones ([atlanticcouncil.org/category/blogs/econographics/cbdc/’]). The PBOC has also experimented with smart contracts for specific uses, such as enabling payments for public services or distributing subsidies.

4.1.3 Implications and Challenges

The e-CNY’s rapid development has demonstrated the feasibility of a large-scale retail CBDC. However, it also raises critical debates. Concerns over privacy and potential state surveillance are significant, although the PBOC claims to offer ‘controllable anonymity.’ The geopolitical implications, particularly its potential role in de-dollarization and shaping a new global payment architecture, are closely watched by international observers. Public adoption continues to be a key factor; while transaction volumes are high, widespread and habitual daily use across the entire population still needs to be cultivated, especially given the established dominance of Alipay and WeChat Pay.

Many thanks to our sponsor Panxora who helped us prepare this research report.

4.2 European Union: Digital Euro

The European Central Bank (ECB) and the Eurosystem have been meticulously exploring the potential of a digital euro since 2021, driven by a complex interplay of strategic considerations unique to the Eurozone.

4.2.1 Motivations and Objectives

The ECB’s primary motivations for a digital euro include:

  • Maintaining Monetary Sovereignty: To ensure the euro remains the anchor of the Eurozone’s monetary system in an increasingly digital world, especially given the rise of private stablecoins and other digital payment solutions, many originating outside Europe. This is crucial for preserving strategic autonomy in payments and finance.
  • Enhancing Payment Efficiency and Resilience: To provide a safe, efficient, and resilient digital payment instrument that can complement cash and existing private digital payments. The digital euro aims to strengthen the resilience of the payment system against cyber threats and operational disruptions.
  • Promoting Financial Inclusion: To ensure that all citizens, including the unbanked, have access to public money in digital form.
  • Fostering Innovation: To provide a robust foundation for European private sector innovation in payment services and foster competition within the payments market.
  • Cross-Border Use: While primarily focused on domestic use, the digital euro is also seen as a potential enabler for more efficient cross-border payments within the Eurozone and internationally.

4.2.2 Design and Implementation

Following a two-year investigation phase, the ECB decided in October 2023 to proceed to a ‘preparation phase’ for a digital euro, aiming for a possible launch by 2025-2026 ([en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_euro’]). The proposed design envisages an intermediated retail CBDC, where commercial banks and supervised payment service providers would distribute the digital euro to users, manage customer interfaces, and handle KYC/AML checks. This two-tier model is designed to preserve the existing role of commercial banks in the financial system and avoid financial disintermediation.

Key design features being considered include:

  • Privacy-Enhancing Features: The ECB has consistently emphasized that the digital euro will meet the ‘highest privacy standards,’ aiming for a degree of privacy for small, low-value transactions comparable to cash, while ensuring traceability for larger transactions to combat illicit finance. This likely involves pseudonymous transactions rather than full anonymity ([synechron.com/en-us/insight/central-bank-digital-currencies-global-view-motivations-perceptions-and-adoptions’]).
  • Offline Functionality: The potential for offline payments to enhance resilience and inclusion, especially in situations of power outages or limited connectivity.
  • Non-Interest-Bearing: To prevent it from becoming an investment vehicle and to avoid disintermediating commercial banks, the digital euro is planned to be non-interest-bearing.
  • Legal Tender Status: It would be legal tender, complementing cash, meaning it would be widely accepted.

4.2.3 Implications and Challenges

The digital euro project faces significant challenges, including securing broad public and political acceptance, managing the impact on the banking sector, ensuring robust cybersecurity, and establishing a clear legal framework. The balance between privacy and the need to combat illicit finance is a particularly delicate issue for European policymakers. The ECB is also grappling with the challenge of interoperability within the diverse Eurozone payment landscape and with potential future international CBDC systems.

Many thanks to our sponsor Panxora who helped us prepare this research report.

4.3 Ghana: E-Cedi

Ghana stands out as one of the pioneering African nations in the CBDC space, with the Bank of Ghana (BoG) launching the pilot phase of its E-Cedi in September 2021.

4.3.1 Motivations and Objectives

Ghana’s primary motivations for the E-Cedi are deeply rooted in its national development agenda:

  • Financial Inclusion: This is a paramount objective. The E-Cedi is designed to provide a secure and accessible digital payment option for the significant portion of Ghana’s population that is unbanked or underbanked, leveraging widespread mobile phone penetration ([en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E-Cedi’]).
  • Payment System Efficiency: To streamline payment processes, reduce transaction costs, and enhance the overall efficiency of the digital payment ecosystem, particularly for retail transactions and government disbursements.
  • Digitization of the Economy: To accelerate Ghana’s transition to a cashless society and foster a more robust digital economy.
  • Resilience and Innovation: To build a more resilient financial infrastructure and catalyze innovation in digital financial services.

4.3.2 Design and Implementation

The E-Cedi is envisioned as an intermediated retail CBDC, distributed by regulated financial institutions. It is designed to be a legal tender, complementing existing physical cedi notes and coins. A key feature is its accessibility via mobile devices, including basic feature phones, making it widely available even without sophisticated smartphone technology or internet connectivity for certain functions. The pilot focused on testing offline payments, inter-operability between various platforms, and small-value retail transactions. The BoG has emphasized the E-Cedi’s role in simplifying remittances and enabling faster, cheaper cross-border payments for Ghanaians abroad.

4.3.3 Implications and Challenges

Ghana’s E-Cedi project is a crucial test case for CBDC implementation in an emerging market context. Challenges include managing public education and adoption, ensuring the stability and security of the new digital infrastructure, and navigating the operational complexities for both the central bank and commercial banks. The E-Cedi’s success will largely depend on its ability to truly bridge the financial inclusion gap and integrate seamlessly into existing payment habits, offering clear advantages over established mobile money platforms.

Many thanks to our sponsor Panxora who helped us prepare this research report.

4.4 Other Notable Global Initiatives

4.4.1 Sweden: e-krona

Sweden’s Riksbank has been a pioneer among advanced economies in exploring a retail CBDC, the e-krona, largely driven by the rapid decline of cash usage in the country. The Riksbank launched a pilot project in 2020 with Accenture, focusing on a DLT-based solution for an intermediated retail CBDC. Their primary motivations include ensuring public access to central bank money, maintaining control over the payment system, and strengthening financial stability in a highly digitalized economy. The e-krona project has deeply explored the technical, legal, and policy implications, contributing significantly to the global understanding of CBDC design ([Riksbank, ‘The Riksbank’s e-krona pilot 2020-2022’]).

4.4.2 India: Digital Rupee (e₹)

India, with its vast population and ambitious digital transformation agenda, launched wholesale (e₹-W) and retail (e₹-R) pilot programs for its digital rupee in late 2022 and early 2023. The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) aims to enhance payment efficiency, foster innovation, and support financial inclusion. The e₹-R pilot is currently underway in various cities, allowing users to transact with merchants and peers via mobile apps provided by participating banks. India’s unique ‘payment stack’ of digital public infrastructure (like UPI and Aadhaar) positions it to potentially achieve rapid adoption of a CBDC, leveraging existing user habits and digital identities.

4.4.3 United States: Digital Dollar Exploration

The United States Federal Reserve has adopted a cautious, research-oriented approach to a potential digital dollar. While no decision has been made to issue a CBDC, the Fed has published extensive research, including a discussion paper titled ‘Money and Payments: The U.S. Dollar in the Age of Digital Transformation.’ The motivations being explored include improving payment efficiency, reducing systemic risk, and preserving the international role of the dollar. The Fed emphasizes a ‘privacy-protected, intermediated, identity-verified, and interoperable’ design. The political landscape in the U.S. presents significant hurdles, particularly regarding privacy concerns and the potential impact on commercial banks, leading to a deliberate and measured pace of exploration ([Federal Reserve, ‘Money and Payments: The U.S. Dollar in the Age of Digital Transformation’]).

4.4.4 United Kingdom: Digital Pound

The Bank of England and HM Treasury are jointly exploring a potential digital pound, seeing it as a crucial step to ensure the UK remains at the forefront of financial innovation. Their motivations include maintaining the UK’s position as a global financial hub, enhancing payment efficiency, and ensuring public access to central bank money in a future where cash use might decline further. They envision a two-tier, intermediated retail CBDC, non-interest-bearing, with a focus on privacy by design. A consultation paper was issued in 2023, and a decision on whether to proceed with development is expected later ([Bank of England & HM Treasury, ‘The digital pound: a new form of money for households and businesses?’]).

4.4.5 Caribbean Nations: Sand Dollar (Bahamas) and DCash (ECCB)

The Bahamas’ Sand Dollar, launched in October 2020, was the world’s first fully deployed retail CBDC. It is an intermediated, account-based system designed to improve payment efficiency, reduce cash handling costs, and enhance financial inclusion across the archipelago’s dispersed islands. Similarly, the Eastern Caribbean Central Bank (ECCB) launched DCash in 2021 across several of its member states. These smaller nations often serve as crucial real-world laboratories, demonstrating the feasibility and challenges of CBDCs in specific contexts, particularly in fostering regional integration and resilience.

5. Debates and Considerations

The journey toward CBDC implementation is fraught with complex debates and critical considerations that extend beyond mere technical feasibility. These discussions touch upon fundamental aspects of privacy, financial stability, economic policy, and international relations.

Many thanks to our sponsor Panxora who helped us prepare this research report.

5.1 Privacy and Surveillance

5.1.1 The Core Concern

One of the most profound and contentious debates surrounding CBDCs revolves around individual privacy and the potential for increased government surveillance of financial transactions. Critics argue that a fully digital, central bank-issued currency could enable unprecedented levels of monitoring of citizens’ spending habits, financial behaviors, and even real-time locations when payments are linked to mobile devices. This raises significant concerns about the erosion of civil liberties and the potential for misuse of data by state entities or even third parties.

Unlike physical cash, which offers complete anonymity by virtue of its physical exchange, digital transactions inherently leave a data trail. The design choice between an ‘account-based’ CBDC (where transactions are linked to identified individuals) and a ‘token-based’ CBDC (which could offer more cash-like anonymity through cryptographic methods) is central to this debate. Most central banks, particularly in democratic nations, recognize the importance of privacy and are exploring designs that balance it with the imperative to combat illicit finance.

5.1.2 Balancing Privacy and Illicit Finance Control

Central banks often articulate a commitment to ‘privacy by design’ for retail CBDCs. For example, the ECB has repeatedly emphasized that the digital euro will meet ‘the highest privacy standards,’ ensuring that transactions are pseudonymous and that personal data is protected, likely through technical means such as truncation of transaction data or privacy-enhancing technologies ([synechron.com/en-us/insight/central-bank-digital-currencies-global-view-motivations-perceptions-and-adoptions’]). This typically means that while transaction details would be known to the intermediaries (e.g., commercial banks), the central bank would only have access to aggregated or anonymized data, or data specifically requested for anti-money laundering (AML) or combating the financing of terrorism (CFT) investigations, subject to judicial oversight. Small, low-value transactions might be designed to offer near-cash-like anonymity through offline capabilities or specific thresholds, as explored in pilot programs by Ghana and Sweden.

However, the tension between privacy and the need to detect and prevent illicit financial activities remains acute. Law enforcement agencies typically advocate for greater transparency and access to transaction data to combat financial crime effectively. The challenge lies in creating a system that provides sufficient privacy for legitimate transactions while allowing authorities to ‘follow the money’ when necessary to tackle serious crimes. Striking this balance requires not only robust technical safeguards but also strong legal frameworks, clear governance rules, and independent oversight mechanisms to prevent abuse of power.

Many thanks to our sponsor Panxora who helped us prepare this research report.

5.2 Financial Stability

5.2.1 Disintermediation Risk

Perhaps the most significant financial stability concern related to retail CBDCs is the risk of ‘disintermediation’ of commercial banks. If individuals and businesses could hold significant amounts of central bank digital currency directly with the central bank (in a direct CBDC model) or could easily convert large commercial bank deposits into CBDC (in an intermediated model, particularly if the CBDC were interest-bearing), this could lead to a substantial shift of funds away from commercial banks. This ‘digital bank run’ scenario, especially during periods of financial stress, could severely impact banks’ ability to lend, manage liquidity, and perform their crucial role in credit creation for the real economy.

Central banks are acutely aware of this risk. Most retail CBDC designs, like the proposed digital euro or the Bank of England’s digital pound, lean towards an intermediated model and a non-interest-bearing design for the CBDC to mitigate disintermediation. Furthermore, many proposals include holding limits for individuals and businesses, preventing the accumulation of excessively large CBDC balances, thereby preserving commercial banks’ deposit base. The Bank of Spain, among others, has highlighted concerns that the proliferation of stablecoins and potentially CBDCs could pose risks to financial stability, emphasizing the need for careful regulatory oversight and design choices that prevent destabilizing shifts of funds ([cincodias.elpais.com/criptoactivos/2025-05-27/el-banco-de-espana-advierte-de-que-el-veto-de-ee-uu-al-dolar-digital-puede-mermar-la-estabilidad-monetaria-global.html’]).

5.2.2 Impact on Monetary Policy Transmission

While a non-interest-bearing CBDC is unlikely to directly alter the monetary policy transmission mechanism (which primarily operates through interest rates on commercial bank reserves), an interest-bearing CBDC could fundamentally change it. If central banks paid interest on CBDC, it could create a new and very direct channel for monetary policy, allowing interest rate changes to be instantly reflected in public holdings. While this offers powerful new tools, it also raises questions about the central bank’s broader role in the economy and the potential for a more intrusive form of monetary policy.

5.2.3 Central Bank Balance Sheet and Operations

The introduction of a large-scale retail CBDC would significantly alter the central bank’s balance sheet, as it would become a substantial liability. Managing this new liability, ensuring operational resilience for potentially billions of transactions, and providing 24/7 customer support (even if indirectly through intermediaries) would represent an unprecedented expansion of central bank operational responsibilities, demanding substantial investment in technology and human capital.

Many thanks to our sponsor Panxora who helped us prepare this research report.

5.3 Geopolitical Implications

CBDCs have the potential to profoundly reshape global financial dynamics and international relations, extending their influence far beyond domestic payment systems.

5.3.1 De-dollarization and Currency Competition

China’s digital yuan, for instance, is not merely a domestic payment innovation; it is part of a broader strategic initiative to internationalize the renminbi and potentially reduce global dependence on the U.S. dollar. By offering a direct digital alternative for cross-border trade and investment, especially within China’s Belt and Road Initiative, the e-CNY could chip away at the dollar’s dominance, which currently underpins the global financial system. This ‘de-dollarization’ trend, if accelerated by CBDCs, could have significant geopolitical consequences, affecting the U.S.’s ability to wield financial sanctions and influence global economic affairs.

Conversely, advanced economies like the Eurozone and the UK are exploring their own CBDCs partly as a defensive measure. The ECB’s development of the digital euro is driven by concerns over the dominance of non-European payment providers and the strategic desire to preserve the euro’s international role and strategic autonomy in digital payments ([atlanticcouncil.org/category/blogs/econographics/cbdc/’]). This reflects a broader global competition for digital currency influence, potentially leading to the formation of digital currency blocs or regional payment systems that are less reliant on existing global infrastructures.

5.3.2 Effectiveness of Financial Sanctions

The emergence of CBDCs also raises questions about the future effectiveness of financial sanctions. If countries or entities can conduct cross-border transactions using CBDCs that operate outside the traditional SWIFT network, it could potentially make it harder for sanctioning bodies (like the U.S. Treasury) to enforce financial penalties. However, conversely, if CBDCs are designed with high levels of transparency and traceability, they could also become powerful tools for enforcing sanctions more effectively, depending on the architecture and international cooperation agreements.

5.3.3 Data Sovereignty and Governance

The increased data generated by CBDC transactions also raises critical questions about data sovereignty – who controls and stores this data, and under what legal jurisdiction? In a multi-CBDC world, the interoperability frameworks and data governance standards that emerge will be crucial in shaping future international financial relations and preventing data fragmentation or exploitation.

Many thanks to our sponsor Panxora who helped us prepare this research report.

5.4 Other Critical Debates and Challenges

5.4.1 Cybersecurity and Operational Resilience

Launching a CBDC means creating a critical national infrastructure that is a prime target for cyberattacks. The central bank would be responsible for safeguarding an immense volume of digital money and transaction data, necessitating state-of-the-art cybersecurity defenses and robust operational resilience frameworks to ensure continuous availability and protection against fraud, hacking, and system failures. A major cybersecurity breach in a CBDC system could have catastrophic consequences for public trust and financial stability.

5.4.2 Technological Infrastructure Requirements

Implementing a CBDC, especially a retail one, requires substantial investment in new technological infrastructure, software development, and specialized expertise within central banks. This includes developing secure digital wallets, robust backend processing systems capable of handling millions or billions of transactions per day, and potentially new communication protocols. For many central banks, this represents a significant undertaking that pushes them beyond their traditional roles.

5.4.3 Public Acceptance and Education

For a retail CBDC to be successful, it must gain widespread public acceptance. This requires clear communication from central banks about the benefits, security, and privacy features of the CBDC, as well as extensive public education campaigns. Overcoming public skepticism, addressing privacy concerns, and demonstrating clear advantages over existing payment methods (like cash or commercial digital payments) are crucial. A lack of public trust or perceived necessity could severely hinder adoption.

5.4.4 Interoperability and Standards

As multiple countries develop their own CBDCs, ensuring interoperability between different national CBDC systems will be vital for facilitating efficient cross-border payments and preventing a fragmented global digital currency landscape. Developing common technical standards, legal frameworks, and governance models for multi-CBDC platforms is a complex task requiring significant international cooperation, spearheaded by organizations like the BIS.

5.4.5 Role of Private Sector Innovation

Central banks generally acknowledge that the private sector is best placed to innovate on new payment services and applications. The challenge lies in designing a CBDC that provides a safe and stable public good while fostering, rather than stifling, private sector innovation. This requires a clear distinction between the central bank’s role as issuer and supervisor and the private sector’s role as service provider and innovator, ensuring a level playing field and avoiding direct competition with commercial banks or fintech companies.

6. Conclusion

Central Bank Digital Currencies represent a profound and inevitable evolution in the global financial system, driven by the relentless march of digital transformation and the strategic imperatives of central banks worldwide. They offer a compelling suite of potential benefits, including drastically enhanced payment efficiency, a significant leap forward in financial inclusion for underserved populations, and a crucial mechanism for nation-states to reassert and maintain monetary sovereignty in an increasingly digital and interconnected world. The ongoing global exploration, exemplified by the advanced stage of China’s e-CNY, the meticulous planning for the European digital euro, and the inclusion-focused efforts like Ghana’s E-Cedi, underscores the diverse motivations and varied approaches underpinning these initiatives.

However, the path to widespread CBDC implementation is anything but straightforward. It is fraught with complex and often contentious issues that demand careful navigation and robust policy responses. Foremost among these are the fundamental concerns surrounding individual privacy and the potential for increased state surveillance, which necessitate the implementation of sophisticated technical safeguards and transparent legal frameworks to preserve civil liberties. The potential impact on financial stability, particularly the risk of disintermediation of commercial banks and its implications for credit creation and monetary policy transmission, requires meticulously crafted design choices, such as intermediated models and holding limits, to mitigate systemic risks. Furthermore, the geopolitical implications, ranging from the potential reshaping of global currency dominance and the future of financial sanctions to questions of data sovereignty, demand a nuanced understanding and proactive engagement on the international stage.

As nations continue to research, pilot, and potentially deploy CBDCs, it is absolutely crucial to strike a delicate and informed balance between embracing the innovation that digital currencies offer and diligently addressing the inherent challenges. Success will hinge on a collaborative approach involving central banks, commercial banks, fintech innovators, policymakers, and the public. The ultimate goal must be to design and implement digital currencies that not only serve the immediate public interest by providing a safe, efficient, and accessible form of money but also contribute to a stable, resilient, inclusive, and internationally cooperative financial system for the 21st century. The debates surrounding CBDCs are not merely technical; they are deeply rooted in societal values, economic principles, and the very future of how money is conceptualized and governed.

References

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*